Batson, T. (1988). The ENFI project: A networked classroom approach to writing instruction. Academic Computing, 2, 55-56.
2.
Baym, K.N. (1993). Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside a computer-mediated fan culture. Journal of Folklore Research, 30, 143-176.
3.
Bazerman, C. ( 1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4.
BeauDort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 486-529.
5.
Bizzell, P. (1978). The ethos of academic discourse. College Composition and Communication, 29, 351-55.
6.
Burke, K. ( 1968). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley : University of California Press.
8.
Cole, M., & Engestrom, Yrjo. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.1-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Cooper, A. (1995). Aboutface: The essentials of user interface design. Foster City, CA: JOG Books Worldwide.
10.
Dibbell, J. (1998). My tiny life: crime and passion in a virtual world. New York: Henry Holt.
11.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1996). The wired neighborhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
12.
Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodemity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13.
Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there there: notes towards a definition of cybercommunity. In S. Johns (Ed.). Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp.203-220). Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communitiesCambridge: Harvard University Press.
17.
Fonow, M. M., & Cook, A. J. (Eds.). (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
19.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.)New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
Hawisher, G., & Selfe, C. ( 1989). Critical perspectives on computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age. Portsmouth, NH : Boynton-Cook.
21.
McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. (1989). The Global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Moran, C. (1999). Access: The word in technology studies. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 205-220). Logan: Utah State University Press and NCTE.
23.
Palmquist, M., Kiefer, K., Hartvigsen, J., & Goodlew, B. (1998). Transitions: Teaching in computer-supported and traditional classrooms. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
24.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
25.
Selfe, C., & Selfe, D. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication , 45, 480-503.
26.
Soja, W.E. ( 1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
27.
Sullivan, P., & Porter, J. (1997). Opening spaces: Writing technologies and critical research practices. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
28.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster .
29.
Engestrom, Y., Reijo, M. , & Raija-Leena, P. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory: Learning in doing social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
