Self-stimulation in children with mental retardation and developmental disabilities interferes with learning, acquiring adaptive behaviors, and participating in social interactions or play. Although reduction in self-stimulation can be achieved through overcorrection and other punishments, maintenance and generalization of the behavior reduction is also necessary. This study used video tape self-as-a-model to generalize and maintain the reduction of hand flapping self-stimulation in a child with mental retardation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerD. M., WolfM. M., & RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
2.
BanduraA. (1969). Social learning of moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 275–279.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
4.
ClarkE., KehleT. J., JensonW. R., & BeckD. E. (1992). Evaluation of the parameters of self-mod-eling interventions. School Psychology Review, 21, 246–254.
5.
CreerT. L., & MiklichD. R. (1990). The applica-tion of self-modeling procedures to modify inap-propriate behavior: A preliminary report. Behavior Research and Therapy, 9, 22–25.
6.
DavisR. A. (1979). The impact of self-modeling on problem behaviors in school-age children. School Psychology Digest (Review), 8, 128–132.
7.
DowrickP. W., & DoveC. (1980). The use of self-modeling to improve the swimming performance of spina bifida children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 51–56.
8.
FoxxR. M., & AzrinN. H. (1973). The elimination of self-stimulatory behavior of autistic and re-tarded children by overcorrection. Journal of Ap-plied Behavior Analysis, 6, 1–14.
9.
FoxxR. M., & BechtelD. R. (1983). Overcorrec-tion: A review and analysis. In AxelrodS. & ApscheJ. (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior (pp. 133–220). New York: Academic Press.
10.
HarrisS. L., & WolchikS. A. (1979). Suppression of self-stimulation: Three alternate strategies. Jour-nal of Applied behavior Analysis, 12, 185–198.
11.
HomerA., & PetersonL. (1980). Differential rein-forcement of other behavior: A preferred re-sponse elimination procedure. Behavior Therapy, 11, 449–471.
12.
KehleT. J., OwenS. V., & CressyE. T. (1990). The use of self-modeling as an intervention in school psychology: A case study of an elective mute. School Psychology Review, 19, 115–121.
13.
KernL., KoegelR. L., & DunlopG. (1984). The influence of vigorous versus mild exercise on au-tistic stereotyped behaviors. Journal of Autism and Developmental disorders, 14, 57–66.
14.
KlierJ. L., & HarrisS. L. (1977). Self-stimulation and learning in autistic children: Physical or func-tional incompatibility. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 311.
15.
MulhernT., & BaumeisterA. A. (1969). An experi-mental attempt to reduce stereotypy by reinforce-ment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 74, 69–74.
16.
ReppA. C., DeitzS. M., & SpeirN. C. (1974). Re-ducing stereotypic responding of retarded per-sons by the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 279–284.
17.
RincoverA. (1978). Sensory extinction: A proce-dure for eliminating self-stimulatory behavior in psychotic children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 6, 299–330.
18.
RollingsJ. P., BaumeisterA. A., & BaumeisterA. A. (1977). The use of overcorrection procedures to eliminate the stereotyped behaviors of retarded individuals: An analysis of collateral behaviors and generalization of suppressive effects. Behavior Modification, 1, 29–46.
19.
StokesT. F., & BaerD. M. (1977). Implicit technol-ogy of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
20.
Sulzer-AzaroffB., & MayerG. R. (1977). Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21.
WellsK. C., ForehandR., HickeyK., & GreenK. D. (1977). Effects of a procedure derived from the overcorrection principle on manipulated and non-manipulated behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 679–687.