There is growing mindfulness in the fields of disability services, rehabilitation, education and psychology of the need to promote self-determination for individuals with mental retardation and developmental disabilities, based at least partially on the importance of this outcome for people to experience an enhanced quality of life. In the present study data were collected on the quality of life and self-determination of 50 individuals with mental retardation, and data were analyzed, using discriminant function analysis and correlational analyses, to determine the contribution of self-determination to quality of life and examine the relationship between these constructs. People who reported a higher quality of life were also identified as more self-determined. The results support the continued effort to promote self-determination for people with mental retardation and developmental disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberyB. (1994). A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination. In HaydenM. F. & AberyB. H. (Eds.), Challenges for a service system in transition (pp. 345–380). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
2.
BrownF., & GothelfC. R. (1996). Self-determination for all individuals. In LehrD. H. & BrownF. (Eds.), People with disabilities who challenge the system (pp. 335–353). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
3.
CrimminsD. B., & BerottiD. (1996). Supporting increased self-determination for individuals with challenging behaviors. In LehrD. H. & BrownF. (Eds.), People with disabilities who challenge the system (pp. 379–402). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
4.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
5.
DollB., SandsD. J., WehmeyerM. L., & PalmerS. (1996). Promoting the development and acquisition of self-determined behavior. In SandsD. J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 65–90). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
DriedgerD. (1989). The last civil rights movement: Disabled Peoples' International. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7.
GagneR. (1994). A self-made man. In BradleyV. J., AshbaughJ. W., & BlaneyB. C. (Eds.), Creating individual supports for people with developmental disabilities (pp. 327–334). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
KennedyM. (1996). Self-determination and trust: My experiences and thoughts. In SandsD.J. & WehmeyerM.L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 37–49). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9.
KishiG., TeelucksinghB., ZollersN., Park-LeeS., & MeyerL. (1988). Daily decision-making in community residences: A social comparison of adults with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 430–435.
10.
KleckaW. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
MartinezC. (1990). Connie Martinez. In CrossmakerM. & MerryD. (Eds.), Stigma: Stereotypes and Scapegoats (p. 110). Columbus, OH: Ohio Legal Rights Service.
12.
NirjeB. (1969). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In KugelR. B. & WolfensbergerW. (Eds.), Changing residential patterns for the mentally retarded (pp. 227–254). Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
13.
NirjeB. (1972). The right to self-determination. In WolfensbergerW. (Ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization (pp. 176–200). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
14.
NorusisM. J. (1992). SPSS for Windows, base system user's guide, Release 5.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
15.
RappaportJ. (1981). In praise of a paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
16.
SandsD. J., & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.). (1996). Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for individuals with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
17.
SchalockR. L. (1996). Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life. In SchalockR. (Ed.), Quality of life: Conceptualization and measurement (Vol. I; pp. 123–139). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
18.
SchalockR. L., & KeithK. D. (1993). Quality of Life Questionnaire Manual. Worthington, OH: IDS Publishing.
19.
SowersJ. A., & PowersL. (1995). Enhancing the participation and independence of students with severe physical and multiple disabilities in performing community activities. Mental Retardation, 33, 209–220.
20.
StancliffeR. (1994). Assessing opportunities for choice-making: A comparison of self- and staff reports. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 418–429.
21.
StancliffeR., & WehmeyerM. L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319–328.
22.
TossebroJ. (1995). Impact of size revisited: Relation of number of residents to self-determination and deprivatization. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 59–67.
23.
WardM. J. (1988). The many facets of self-determination. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Handicaps Transition Summary, 5, 2–3.
24.
WardM. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination: A historical and personal perspective. In SandsD. J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 3–16). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25.
WardM. J., & KohlerP. D. (1996). Promoting self-determination for individuals with disabilities: Content and process. In PowersL. E., SingerG. H. S., & SowersJ. (Eds.), On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities (pp. 275–290). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.
27.
WehmeyerM. L. (1995a). The Arc's self-determination scale: Procedural guidelines. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
28.
WehmeyerM. L. (1995b). The use of assistive technology by people with mental retardation and barriers to this outcome: A pilot study. Technology and Disability, 4, 195–204.
29.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996a). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In SandsD. J. & WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 17–36). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
30.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996b). Student self-report measure of self-determination for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282–293.
31.
WehmeyerM. L., KelchnerK., & RichardsS. (1995). Individual and environmental factors related to the self-determination of adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 291–305.
32.
WehmeyerM. L., KelchnerK., & RichardsS. (1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behaviors of adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.
33.
WehmeyerM. L., & MetzlerC. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.
34.
WehmeyerM. L., & SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
35.
WehmeyerM. L., & WestM. D. (Eds.). (1995). Theme issue: Self-determination. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5(4).
36.
WilliamsR. R. (1989). Creating a new world of opportunity: Expanding choice and self-determination in lives of Americans with severe disability by 1992 and beyond. In PerskeR. (Ed.), Proceedings from the National Conference on Self-Determination (pp. 16–17). Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration.
37.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). Normalization: The principle of normalization. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
38.
ZimmermanM.A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.
