The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of two initiation techniques on community leisure participation during free time for adults with mild to moderate mental retardation. Using an alternating treatment design, a comparison of two interventions, calendar and telephone prompts, was made to determine which technique would assist individuals best in initiating participation in community leisure activities, with the ultimate intent to enhance their self-determination. Results indicated a positive relationship between both interventions and the initiation of community leisure activities. Each participant consistently initiated more community leisure activities during the comparison, optimal intervention, and follow-up conditions than during baseline. Results indicated that each prompting technique was more effective than no prompts, with some participants responding more positively to telephone prompts, while others responded more positively to the use of the calendar prompt. These results are discussed relative to their implications for practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambaraL. M., & AgerC. (1992). Using self-scheduling to promote self-directed leisure activity in home and community settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17(2), 67–76.
2.
BarlowD. H., & HayesS. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–21.
3.
ColemanR. S., & WhitmanT. L. (1984). Developing, generalizing, and maintaining physical fitness in mentally retarded adults: Toward a self-directed program. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 109–127.
4.
CrappsJ. M., LangoneJ., & SwaimS. (1985). Quantity and quality of participation in community environments by mentally retarded adults. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 20, 123–129.
5.
DattiloJ. (1991). Recreation and leisure: A review of the literature and recommendations for future directions. In MeyerL. H., PeckC. A., & BrownL. (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 171–193). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
DattiloJ. (1995). Instruction for preference and generalization. In SchleienS. J., MeyerL. H., HeyneL. A., & BrandtB. B. (Eds.), Lifelong leisure skills and lifestyles for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 133–146). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
DattiloJ., & HogeG. (1994). TRAIL Leisure assessment battery: For people with cognitive impairments. Unpublished manuscript, University of Georgia, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies and University Affiliated Program, Athens.
8.
DattiloJ., & HogeG. (in press). Interviewing adults with mental retardation: Issues of validity and reliability. Therapeutic Recreation Journal.
9.
DattiloJ., & KleiberD. A. (1993). Psychological perspectives for therapeutic recreation research. In MalkinM. J. & HoweC. Z. (Eds.), Research in therapeutic recreation: Basic concepts and methods (pp. 57–73). State College, PA: Venture.
10.
DattiloJ., & LightJ. (1993). Setting the stage for leisure: Encouraging reciprocal communication for people using augmentative and alternative communication systems through facilitator instruction. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 28, 156–171.
11.
DattiloJ., & O'KeefeB. M. (1992). Setting the stage for leisure: Encouraging adults with mental retardation who use augmentative and alternative communication systems to share conversations. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 26(1), 27–37.
12.
DattiloJ., & SchleienS. J. (1994). Understanding leisure services for individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 32, 53–59.
13.
DattiloJ., & St. PeterS. (1991). A model for including leisure education in transition services for young adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 420–432.
14.
FainG. S. (1986). Leisure: A moral imperative. Mental Retardation, 24, 261–263.
15.
FawcettS. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 235–239.
16.
GuessD., BensonH. A., & Siegal-CauseyE. (1985). Concepts and issues related to choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 10(2), 79–86.
17.
KnollJ., & FordA. (1987). Beyond caregiving: A reconceptualization of the role of the residential service provider. In TaylorS. J., BiklenD., & KnollJ. (Eds.), Community integration for people with severe disabilities (pp. 129–146). New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
KrausR. (1989). Recreation and leisure in modern society (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Harper-Collins.
19.
LakinK. C., BruininksR. H., & LarsonS. A. (1992). The changing face of residential services. In RowitzL. (Ed.), Mental retardation in the year 2000 (pp. 197–250). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20.
MacDuffG. S., KrantzP. J., & McClannahanL. E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 89–97.
21.
MahonM. J. (1994). The use of self-control techniques to facilitate self-determination skills during leisure in adolescents and young adults with mild and moderate mental retardation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 28, 58–72.
22.
MahonM. J., & BullockC. C. (1992). Teaching adolescents with mild mental retardation to make decisions in leisure through the use of self-control techniques. Therapeutic recreation Journal, 26(1), 9–26.
23.
NietupskiJ., Hamre-NietupskiS., GreenK., Varnum-TeeterK., LePeraD., SceboldK., & HanrahanM. (1986). Self-initiated and sustained leisure activity participation by students with moderate/severe handicaps. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 259–264.
24.
SchalockR. L., KeithK. D., HoffmanK., & KaranO. C. (1989). Quality of life: Its measurement and use. Mental Retardation, 27, 25–31.
25.
SchwartzI. S., & BaerD. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
26.
SearleM. S., MahonM. J., Iso-AholaS. E., SdroliasH. A., & van DyckJ. (1995). Enhancing a sense of independence and psychological well-being among the elderly: A field experiment. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 107–124.
27.
SylvesterC. (1992). Therapeutic recreation and the right to leisure. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 26(2), 9–20.
28.
TawneyJ., & GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
29.
WallM. E., & DattiloJ. (1995). Creating option-rich learning environments: Facilitating self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 29, 276–294.
30.
WehmeyerM. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.
31.
WehmeyerM. L. (1994). Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 29, 9–21.
32.
WehmeyerM. L., & MetzlerC. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.
33.
WhitmanT. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347–362.
