Communicative Agreement Between Spoken Utterances and Actions Among Persons with Mild-to-Moderate Mental Retardation

Abstract

This study examined agreement between naturalistic verbalizations and emission of referent actions in 15 individuals between the ages of 20 and 39 years with mild-to-moderate mental retardation. These verbalizations occurred during two conditions: before or after the opportunity to emit the referent actions (Say-do and Do-say sequences, respectively). Within each condition, actions were divided into groups consisting of those that were either of preferred or of neutral interest to participants (as identified by direct care staff and assessed through preference testing procedures). The proportion of communicative agreement in Do-say conditions (95.3%) was significantly greater than the proportion observed in Say-do conditions (52%) (F = 46.02, p < .001), and the proportion of agreement in opportunities involving preferred activities (88.7%) was significantly higher than the proportion of opportunities involving neutral activities (58.8%) (F = 119.35, p < .001). Follow-up analyses revealed that significantly higher proportions of agreement for pre-ferred activities existed only under Say-do conditions (82.7% for preferred activities vs 21.6% for neutral activities) (t = 3.65, p < .05). Implications for practice and directions for further research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baer

(1990). Correspondence training: Review and current issues. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 11, 379–393.

Baer

, & Detrich

(1990). Tacting and manding in correspondence training: Effects of child selection of verbalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54, 23–30.

Baer

, Williams

, Osnes

, & Stokes

(1985). Generalized verbal control and correspondence training. Behavior Modification, 9, 477–489.

Cooper

L.J.

, & Harding

(1993). Extending functional analysis procedures to outpatient and classroom settings for children with mild disabilities. In Reichle

& Wacker

(Eds.), Communicative approaches to challenging behavior: integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 41–62). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

de Freitas Ribiero

(1989). Correspondence in children's self-report: Tacting and manding aspects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 361–367.

Dunlop

, & Kern

(1993). Assessment and intervention for children within the instructional curriculum. In Reichle

& Wacker

(Eds.), Communicative approaches to challenging behavior: integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 177–204). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Dyer

, Dunlap

, & Winterling

(1990). The effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515–524.

Grice

(1975). Logic and conversation. In Davidson

I.D.

& Harmon

(Eds.), The logic of grammar. Encino, CA: Dickenson Press.

Israel

(1978). Some thoughts on correspondence between saying and doing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 271–276.

10.

Israel

, & O'Leary

K. D.

(1973). Developing correspondence between children's words and deeds. Child Development, 44, 575–581.

11.

Kazdin

(1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Kirk

R. E.

(1982). Experimental design. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

13.

Matthews

, Shimoff

, & Catania

A. C.

(1987). Saying and doing: A contingency-space analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 69–74.

14.

Pace

, Ivancic

, Edwards

, Iwata

, & Page

(1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255.

15.

Paniagua

(1989). Lying by children: Why children say one thing, do another. Psychological Reports, 64, 971–984.

16.

Paniagua

, & Baer

(1982). The analysis of correspondence training as a chain reinforceable at any point. Child Development, 53, 786–798.

17.

Paniagua

, & Baer

(1988). Luria's regulatory concept and its misplacement in verbal-nonverbal correspondence training. Psychological Reports, 62, 371–378.

18.

Risley

T. R.

, & Hart

(1968). Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.

19.

Rogers-Warren

, & Baer

(1976). Correspondence between saying and doing: Teaching children to share and praise. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 335–354.

20.

Stokes

, Osnes

, & DaVerne

(1993). Mediated generalization and the interpretation of children's verbal behavior. In Reichle

& Wacker

(Eds.), Communicative approaches to challenging behavior, (pp. 299–316). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Co.

21.

Wacker

, Berg

, McMahon

, Templeman

, McKinney

, Swarts

, Visser

, & Marquardt

(1988). An evaluation of labeling-then-doing with moderately handicapped persons: Acquisition and generalization with complex tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 369–380.

22.

Weninger

, & Baer

(1990). Correspondence training with time delay: A comparison with reinforcement of compliance. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 36–44.

23.

Wilson

P. G.

, Rusch

F. R.

, & Lee

(1992). Strategies to increase exercise-report correspondence by boys with moderate mental retardation: Collateral chances in intention-exercise correspondence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 681–690.

24.

Wolf

M. M.

(1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement, or how behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.