This article elaborates on a policy statement recently adopted by the Board of Directors of CEC-MRDD. The history of the development the movement toward more inclusive schools is reviewed. The need for adequate training and preparation for inclusion for the entire educational community is explored. Examples of preparation and training efforts are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AffleckJ. Q., MadgeS., AdamsA., & LowenbraunS. (1988). Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339–349.
2.
BerryK. (1972). Models for Mainstreaming. San Rafael, CA: Dimension Publishing.
3.
BurelloL. C., & WrightP. T. (1992). The principal letters: Practices for inclusive schools. Bloomington, IN: The National Academy/CASE.
4.
CosdenM. A. (1990). Expanding the role of special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22, 4–7.
5.
Council for Exceptional Children (1993). CEC policy on inclusive schools and community settings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(4), supplement.
6.
Council for Exceptional Children Policies Commission (1973). Proposed CEC policy statement on the organization and administration of special education. Exceptional Children, 39, 493–497.
7.
DavernL., & SchnorrR. (1991). Public schools welcome students with disabilities as full members. Children Today, 20, 21–25.
8.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special Education for the mildly retarded-Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 34, 5–22.
9.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., HamlettC. L., PhillipsN. B., & KarnsK. (1995). General educators' specialized adaptations for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 440–459.
10.
FuchsD., FuchsL. S., & FernstromP. (1992). Case-by-case reintregation of students with learning disabilities. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 261–281.
11.
FuchsD., & FuchsL. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
12.
GiangrecoM. F., DennisR., CloningerC., EdelmanS., & SchattmanR. (1993). I've counted Jan: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359–372.
13.
HellerH. W., & SchilitJ. (1987). The regular education initiative: A concerned response. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(3), 1–7.
14.
HiltonA., & LibertyK. (1991). The challenge of ensuring educational gains for students with severe disabilities who are placed in more integrated settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 167–175.
15.
JenkinsJ. R., & HeinenA. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull-out, in-class, or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516–523.
16.
JenkinsJ. R., JewellM., LeicesterN., O'ConnorR. R., JenkinsL. M., & TroutnerN. M. (1994). Accommodations for individual differences without classroom ability groups: An experiment in school restructuring. Exceptional Children, 60, 344–358.
17.
JenkinsJ. R., OdomS. L., & SpeltzM. L. (1989). Effects of social integration on preschool children with handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 420–428.
18.
KauffmanJ. M. (1989). The Regular Education Initiative as Reagan-Bush Education Policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach. The Journal of Education, 23, 256–278.
19.
LiebermanL. M. (1985). Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven?Exceptional Children, 51, 513–516.
20.
LillyM. S. (1970). Special education: A tempest in a teapot. Exceptional Children, 37, 43–48.
21.
LRP Publications. (1995). Pennsylvania teacher poll shows inclusion on the rise, supports lacking. Inclusive Education Programs, 3(1), 7–8.
22.
McLaughlinM., & WarrenS. (1992). Issues and Options In Restructuring Schools and Special Education Programs. College Park, Maryland: The Center for Policy Options in Special Education, University of Maryland.
23.
Office of Special Education Programs (1993). Fifteenth Annual Report on the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
Office of Special Education Programs (1995). Seventeenth Annual Report of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
25.
RobinsonV. (1990). Regular education initiative: Debate on the current state and future promise of a new approach to educating children with disabilities. Counterpoint, Fall, 5.
26.
SalendS. (1983). Mainstreaming: Sharpening up follow-up. Academic Therapy, 18, 299–304.
27.
SalendS. J., BrooksL., & SalendS. (1987). Identifying school districts' policies for implementing mainstreaming. The Pointer, 32, 34–37.
28.
SawyerR. J., McLaughlinM. J., & WingleeM. (1992). IS Integration of Students With Disabilities Happening? An Analysis of National Trends Over Times. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc..
29.
SchlossP. J. (1992). Mainstreaming revisited. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 233–244.
30.
SchultzJ. J. (1994). Inclusion: The debate continues. Instructor, 104(4), 55–56.
31.
SmithJ. D. (1995). Inclusive school environments and students with disabilities. Occasional Papers, University of South Carolina Educational Policy Center, 1, 1–5.
32.
WillM. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
33.
WoleryM., WertsM. G., CaldwellN. K., SynderE. D., & LisowskiL. (1995). Experienced teachers' perceptions of resources and supports for inclusion. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities, 30, 15–26.
