Community paramedicine programs are beginning to flourish across the nation, and the need to provide demonstration or pilot programs is essential to providing a consistent and high-level standard for this model of care. While the overarching goals are to align with the Triple Aim, piloting a community paramedicine program also allows each community to develop and implement a program tailored to the healthcare needs of their specific community. A successful program builds the evidence base that can then be used to create legislative change necessary to financially sustain this model of care across the healthcare delivery system. This article provides a discussion of the healthcare needs of people living in rural areas and of the ways in which community paramedicine can address some of those needs. This article begins with a discussion of legislative authorization and characteristics of the Maine community paramedicine pilot program, the general strategies for implementation, and lessons learned from these programs. A case study of a Maine community paramedicine program provides an example of key implementation strategies along with structural and operation functions of the program that may be useful for other community paramedicine pilot sites looking to implement a community-based health care program.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011). 2010 National healthcare disparities report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, AHRQ.
2.
An Act to Authorize the Establishment of Pilot Projects for Community Paramedicine, Pub. L., Chapter 562, LD 1837, 125th Maine Legislature (2012).
3.
BennettK. J., OlatosiB., & ProbstJ. C. (2008). Health disparities: A rural-urban chartbook. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Rural Health Research Center.
4.
BerwickD. M., NolanT. W., & WhittingtonJ. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.
5.
BoutwellA., JencksS., NielsenG. A., & RutherfordP. (2009). State Action on Avoidable Rehospitalizations (STAAR) initiative: Applying early evidence and experience in front-line process improvements to develop a state-based strategy. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, Sep 17). Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR: Recommendations and Reports, 48(RR-11), 1–40.
8.
ChoiB. Y., BlumbergC., & WilliamsK. (2016, Mar). Mobile integrated health care and Community Paramedicine: An emerging emergency medical services concept. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 67(3), 361–366. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.005.
9.
County Health Rankings. (2016). County health rankings & roadmaps. web page. Retrieved March 29, 2016, from http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/.
10.
DoescherM. P., FordyceM. A., SkillmanS. M., JacksonJ. E., & RosentblattR. A. (2009). Persistent primary care health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) and health care access in rural America. (Policy Brief). Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Center.
11.
FordyceM. A., ChenF. M., DoescherM. P., & HartL. G. (2007). 2005 physician supply and distribution in rural areas of the United States. (Final Report #116). Seattle, WA: WWAMI Rural Health Research Cener.
12.
GoodmanD. C., FisherE. S., & ChangC.-H. (2013). After hospitalization: A Dartmouth Atlas report on readmissions among Medicare beneficiariesThe revolving door: A report on U.S. Hospital readmissions (pp. 7–30). Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
13.
HRSA Data Warehouse. (2013). Designated health professional shortage areas statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Clinician Recruitment and Service.
14.
IezzoniL. I., DornerS. C., & AjayiT. (2016). Community Paramedicine — addressing questions as programs expand. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(12), 1107–1109. doi: doi:10.1056/NEJMp1516100.
JencksS. F., WilliamsM. V., & ColemanE. A. (2009, Apr 2). Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(14), 1418–1428. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0803563.
17.
Kahn-TrosterS., BurgessA., CoburnA., WallaceR., CrollZ., & GalloR. (2016). Maine rural health profiles: A statewide view of rural health. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School, Maine Rural Health Research Center.
18.
LenardsonJ. D., ZillerE. C., CoburnA. F., & AndersonN. J. (2009). Profile of rural health insurance coverage: A chartbook. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Muskie School of Public Service, Maine Rural Health Research Center.
19.
LevitonL. C., KhanL. K., RogD., DawkinsN, & CottonD. (2010, Evaluability assessment to improve public health policies, programs, and practices. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 213–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103625.
20.
Maine Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. (May, 2013). Chapter 3, section 10: Ground ambulance service and non- transporting service licenses, pilot projects. 32 M.R.S.A., chapter 2-B.Augusta, ME: Maine Department of Public Safety. http://www.maine.gov/ems/documents/Rules_Effective_May_1_2013.pdf.
McDonaldK. M., SchultzE., AlbinL., PinedaN, LonhartJ., SundaramV., … MalcolmE. (2010). Care coordination atlas version 3. (AHRQ Publication No.11-0023-EF). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
23.
McGinnisK. (2004). Rural and frontier emergency medical services: Agenda for the future.Kansas City, MO: National Rural Health Association.
Medstar Mobile Healthcare. (2015). Mobile integrated healthcare: Approach to implementation. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
26.
MIH Core-Development Group. (2016). Assessing the outcomes and value of EMS-based mobile integrated healthcare programs. Clinton, MS National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians.
27.
MorV., IntratorO., FengZ., & GrabowskiD. C. (2010, Jan-Feb). The revolving door of rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities. Health Affairs, 29(1), 57–64. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0629.
28.
National Advisory Committee on Rural Health and Human Services. (2010). 2010 report to the secretary: Health and human service issues. Washington, DC: NACRHHS.
29.
Office of Rural Health Policy. (2012). Community paramedicine evaluation tool. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, ORHP.
30.
PattersonD., & SkillmanS. M. (2013). National consensus conference on community paramedicine: Summary of an expert meeting. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
31.
PearsonK. B., GaleJ., & ShalerG. (2014). The evidence for community paramedicine in rural areas: State and local findings and the role of the state Flex program. (Briefing Paper No. 34). Portland, ME: Flex Monitoring Team.
32.
PleisJ. R., & Lethbridge-CejkuM. (2007). Summary health statistics for U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 10: Data from the National Health Survey(235), 1–153.
33.
ShadishW. R., CookT. D., & LevitonL. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theorists and their theories. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
TrevisanM. S., & HauangY. M. (2003). Evaluability assessment: A primer. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(20). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=20.
WholeyJ. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
38.
WholeyJ. S., HatryH. P., & NewcomerK. E. (2004). Handbook of practical program evaluation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
ZillerE. C., CoburnA. F., LouxS. L., HoffmanC., & McBrideT. D. (2003). Health insurance coverage in rural America: A chartbook. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
