BabbieE. (1992). The Practice of Social Research.Belmont: CA, Wadsworth.
2.
BeebeejaunY. & GrimshawL. (2011). Is the ‘New Deal for Communities’ a new deal for equality? Getting women on board in neighborhood governance. Urban Studies, 48(10), 1997–2011.
3.
BryerT. A. (2009). Explaining Responsiveness in Collaboration: Administrator and Citizen Role Perceptions. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 271–283.
4.
City of Albuquerque (2016). Code of Ordinances.The City of Albuquerque. Retrieved from https://www.cabq.gov/.
GraddyE. & WangL. (2009). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), 392–412.
12.
HaddadM. A. (2004). Community determinants of volunteer participation and the promotion of civic health: The case of Japan. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 8S–31S.
13.
HairJ.F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR.E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Princeton Hall.
14.
HaurinD. R., DietzR.D., & WeinbergB. A. (2003). The impact of neighborhood homeownership rates: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Housing Research, 13(2), 119–151.
15.
KelleherC. & LoweryD. (2004). Political participation and metropolitan institutional context. Urban Affairs Review, 39(6), 720–757.
16.
KingK. N. (2004). Neighborhood associations and urban decision making in Albuquerque. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 391–409.
17.
Korea Appraisal Board (n.d.). Actual Transaction Cost of Housing. Retrieved from http://www.kab.co.kr.
Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (2013). Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements: Assessment and Support of the Apartment Community.Anyang, South Korea.
20.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. London: Sage.
21.
MarschallM. J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods:Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 231–244.
22.
McCabeB. C. (2005). The rules are different here: An institutional comparison of cities and homeowners associations. Administration & Society, 37(4), 404–425.
23.
McCabeB. C. (2006). Privatizing urban services through homeowners associations: The potential and practice in Phoenix. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 837–847.
24.
McCabeB. C. (2011). Homeowners associations as private governments: What we know, what we don't know, and why it matters.sPublic Administration Review, 71(4), 535–542.
25.
McCabeB. C. & TaoJ. (2006). Private governments and private services: Homeowners associations in the city and behind the gate. Review of Policy Research, 23(6), 1143–1157.
26.
McKenzieE. (2005). Constructing the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities. Housing Studies, 20(2), 187–203.
27.
Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of South Korea (n.d.). Actual Transaction Cost of Housing, Retrieved from http://rt.molit.go.kr.
28.
National Conference of Citizenship (2009). 2009 America's Civic Health Index: Civic Health in Hard Times. Washington, D.C.: National Conference on Citizenship.
PekkanenR. (2009). Japan's neighborhood associations. In ReadBenjamin L. & PekkanenRobert (Eds.): Local Organizations and Urban Governance in East and Southeast Asia: Straddling state and Society (pp. 27–57). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
PutnamR. D. (1993. March. 21). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 4(13), 1–11.
32.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: Thinking about social change in America. In Steven OttJ. & DickeLisa A. (Eds.), The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector (3rd ed.), 237–246. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
RankinB. H. & QuaneJ. M. (2000). Neighborhood poverty and the social isolation of inner-city African American families:Social Forces, 79(1), 139–164.
34.
Real Estate 114 of South Korea (n.d.). Housing Price Calculator. Retrieved from http://www.r114.com.
RossB. H. & LevineM. A. (2012). Urban Politics: Cities and Suburbs in a Global Age. 8th ed. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
37.
Seongbuk (2016). Neighborhood Democracy.Seoul, South Korea: Seongbuk-gu.
38.
Seoul Development Institute (2010). Improvement of the Publicness of Apartment Complex Management.Seoul, South Korea: Seoul Development Institute.
39.
ShresthaM. K. (2013). Internal versus external social capital and the success of community initiatives: A case of self-organizing collaborative governance in Nepal, Public Administration Review, 73(1), 154–164.
Van HouwelingenP. (2012). Neighborhood associations and social capital in Japan, Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), 467–497.
42.
YoonS.Y. (2002). An exploratory study on the single people time use and leisure behavior:Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 20(6), 209–217.
43.
YoungD. R. (1989). Government failure theory. In Steven OttJ. & DickeLisa A. (Eds.): The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector. (3rd ed.), 126–128. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.