In times of fiscal crisis, demand for health and human services increases while revenues shrink, causing funders to focus more intently on identifying the most successful organizations in which to invest scarce resources. This research grew out of interest in enhancing performance assessment of nonprofit organizations expressed by local government managers. A survey of Alliance for Innovation Members explores two primary research questions: 1) what is a successful nonprofit; and 2) what type(s) of performance assessment tools are the most useful. The results strengthen our understanding of what information city and county managers want and why they prefer certain evaluation tools.
BarmanEmily. 2007. What is the Bottom Line for Nonprofit Organizations? A History of Measurement in the British Voluntary Sector. Voluntas. 18:101:115.
3.
BessRoseana, Leos-UrbelJacob, and GeenRob. 2001. The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children II: What Has Changed Since 1996? Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute. Assessing the New Federalism Occasional Paper Number 46.
4.
BlackwoodAmy, WingKennard T., and PollakThomas H.. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief: Facts and Figures from the Nonprofit Almanac 2008: Public Charities, Giving, and Volunteering. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
5.
BorisElizabeth T.1998. Myths about the Nonprofit Sector. Charting Civil Society. A Series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy. The Urban Institute No. 4:1–4.
6.
BridgelandJohn M., McNaughtMary, ReedBruce, and DunkelmanMarc. 2009. The Quiet Crisis: The Impact of the Economic Downturn on the Nonprofit Sector. A Report by Civic Enterprises and Democratic Leadership Council retrieved November 7, 2009 from http://www.dlc.org/documents/Quiet_Crisis.pdf.
CarmanJoanne G.2007. Evaluation Practice Among Community-Based Organizations: Research Into the Reality. American Journal of Evaluation. 28(1): 60–75.
9.
CoaseRonald H.1988. American Philanthropy, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
DeVitaCarol. 1997. Viewing Nonprofits Across the States. Charting Civil Society. A Series by the Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy. The Urban Institute. No. 1: pp. 1–6.
11.
DeVitaCarol. 1999. Nonprofits and Devolution: What do We Know? In Boris, Elizabeth T. and C. Eugene Steuerle, eds. Nonprofits and Government. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
12.
DunnWilliam N.2008. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Fourth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
13.
FrumkinPeter. 2002. On Being Nonprofit: A Conceptual and Policy Primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
HansmannHenry B.1980. The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal. 89: 835–98.
15.
National Center for Charitable Statistics.2009. Registered Nonprofit Organizations by Major Purpose or Activity (NTEE Code), 12/1999 and 12/2008. Retrieved March 17, 2009 from http://nccsdataweb.urban.org.
PavettiLaDonna, DerrMichelle K., AndersonJacquelyn, TrippeCarole, and PaschalSidnee. 2001. Changing the Culture of the Welfare Office: The Role of Intermediaries in Linking TANF Recipients with Jobs. Economic Policy Review. 7: 63–76.
Rose-AckermanSusan. 1986. The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
RossiPeter H., LipseyMark W., and FreemanHoward E.. 2004. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Seventh Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
21.
SalamonLester M.1995. Partners in Public Service. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
SmithSteven Rathgeb. 2006. Government Financing of Nonprofit Activity. In Boris, Elizabeth T. and C. Eugene Steuerle, eds. Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict (Second Edition). Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
23.
SmithSteven Rathgeb, and LipskyMichael. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
YoungDennis R.1999. Complementary, Supplementary, or Adversarial? A Theoretical and Historical Examination of Nonprofit-Government Relations in the United States. In Boris, Elizabeth T. and C. Eugene Steuerle, eds. Nonprofits and Government. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
