Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-12
Medicaid Fee for Service Reimbursement and the Delivery of Human Services for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Or Severe Mental Illness: Negotiating Cost
Fees paid by Medicaid are a primary resource for nonprofit organizations serving individuals with developmental disabilities and severe mental illness. While Medicaid reimbursement has facilitated the transition from institutional to community care, cost is not well understood. This article examines how government and nonprofit organizations negotiate the cost of service delivery. Analysis based on this case study shows cost is a central concern for both government and nonprofit service providers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AugerD.A. (1999). “Privatization, contracting, and the states: Lessons from state government experience.” Public Productivity & Management Review, 22, 4: 435–454.
2.
CooperP.J. (2003). Governing by contract: Challenges and opportunities for public managers. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
3.
BoydD.J. (1998). “Medicaid devolution: A fiscal perspective.” In ThompsonF.J. & DiIulioJ.J.Jr. (Eds.), Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States (pp. 56–105). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
4.
DeHoogR.H. (1990). “Competition, negotiation, or cooperation: Three models for service contracting.” Administration & Society, 22, 3: 317–340.
5.
DeHoogR.H. & SalamonL.M. (2002). “Purchase-of-service contracting.” In SalamonL.M. (Ed.), The Tools of Government (pp. 319–339). Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
6.
DilgerR.J., MoffettR.R., & StruykL. (1997). “Privatization of municipal services in America's largest cities.” Public Administration Review, 57, 1: 21–26.
7.
FerrisJ., & GraddyE. (1986). “Contracting out: For what? With whom?” Public Administration Review 46, 4: 332–344.
8.
GlaserB.G., & StraussA.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
9.
GoldsmithS., & EggersW.D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
10.
GrabowskiD.D. (2006). “The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: Review and synthesis of the most recent evidence.” Medical Care Research and Review, 63, 3: 3–28.
11.
JohnstonJ.M., & RomzekB.S. (1999). “Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories, and reality.” Public Administration Review, 59, 5: 383–399.
KettlD.F. (1993). Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
14.
KitchenerM., NgT., MillerN., & HarringtonC. (2005). “Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services: National program trends.” Health Affairs 24, 1: 206–212.
15.
LeBlancA.J., TonnerM.C., & HarringtonC. (2000). “Medicaid 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Services waivers across the states.” Health Care Financing Review 22, 2: 159–174.
16.
MartinL.L. (2004). “The privatization of human services: Myths, social capital and civil society.” Journal of Health and Human Services27, 1/2: 175–193.
17.
MartinL.L. (1999). Contracting for service delivery: Local government choices. Washington, D.C.: ICMA (International City/County Management Association).
18.
MillerN.A., KitchenerM., ElderK.T., KangY., RubinA., HarringtonC. (2005). “Variation by disability in state predictors of Medicaid 1915c waiver use and expenditures.” The Gerontologist, 45, 6: 764–772.
RappC.A. (2002). “Incentive structures within mental health financing strategies: Toward an incentive based model.” The Social Policy Journal1,2: 37–53.
21.
RomzekB.S., & JohnstonJ.M. (2002). “Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12, 3, 423–453.
22.
RomzekB.S., & JohnstonJ.M. (1999). “Reforming Medicaid through contracting: The nexus of implementation and organizational culture.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9, 1: 107–139.
23.
SalamonL.M. (1999). America's nonprofit sector: A primer. New York, NY: The Foundation Center.
24.
SalamonL. (1995). Partners in public service. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
SmithS.R. (1996). “Transforming public services: Contracting for social and health services in the U.S.” Public Administration, 74, 1, 113–127.
26.
SmithS.R., & LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
TallonJ.R.Jr., & BrownL.D. (1998). “Who gets what? Devolution of eligibility and benefits in Medicaid.” In ThompsonF.J. & DiIulioJ.J.Jr. (Eds.), Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States (pp. 235–257). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
28.
ThompsonF.J. (1998). The faces of devolution. In ThompsonF.J. & DiIulioJ.J.Jr. (Eds.), Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States (pp. 14–55). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
29.
ThompsonF.J., & DiIulioJ.J.Jr. (Eds.). (1998). Medicaid and Devolution: A View from the States. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
30.
VladeckB.C. (2003, January/February). “Where the action really is: Medicaid and the disabled.” Health Affairs 22, 1: 90–100.
31.
WeitzmanM.S., JalandoniN.T., LampkinL.M., & PollakT.H. (2002). The New Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
32.
YinR.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
ZanetichJ. (2000). “The role of a county health department as a linking-pin organization in a network.” Journal of Health and Human Services 23, 3: 324–360.
