The research assesses whether police respond differently to victims of domestic and non-domestic interpersonal conflicts. Though many laws and policies have been introduced since the 1980s to enhance police responses to and protection of victims of domestic violence, very few studies have empirically examined police assistance or support toward victims of both domestic and non-domestic conflicts. Using data collected by a large-scale observational project, this research analyzes officer-initiated assistances and police responses to victim requests during conflict resolution. Findings show that police are more likely to provide assistances on their own initiative to victims of domestic violence than victims of non-domestic violence. Police, however, do not differ significantly in their responses to requests made by victims of domestic and non-domestic conflicts. Implications for policy and future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachmanR. and CokerA. (1995). “Police Involvement in Domestic Violence: The Interactive Effects of Victim Injury, Offender's History of Violence, and Race.” Violence and Victims10(2): 91–106.
2.
BayleyD. (1986). “The Tactic Choices of Police Patrol Officers.” Journal of Criminal Justice14(4): 329–348.
3.
BelknapJ. (1996). “Policewomen, Policemen, or Both?: Recruitment and Training Implications for Responses to Woman Battering.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice12(3): 215–234.
4.
BellD. (1985). “Domestic Violence: Victimization, Police Intervention, and Disposition.” Journal of Criminal Justice13(6): 525–534.
5.
BerkR., FenstermakerS., and NewtonP. (1988). “An Empirical Analysis of Police Responses to Incidents of Wife Battery.” In Copying with Family Violence: Research and Policy Perspectives. Eds. HotalingG., FinkelholD., KirkpatrickJ., and StrausM.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 158–168.
6.
BerkS. and LosekeD. (1981). “Handling Family Violence: Situational Determinants of Police Arrest in Domestic Disturbances.” Law and Society Review15(2): 317–344.
7.
BlackD. (1980). The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.
8.
BlountW., YegidisB., and MaheuxR. (1992). “Police Attitudes toward Preferred Arrest: Influences of Rank and Productivity.” American Journal of Police11(3): 35–52.
9.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (1995). Violence against Women: The National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington D.C.: US Department of Justice.
10.
BuzawaE. (1988). “Explaining Variations in Police Response to Domestic Violence: A Case Study in Detroit and New England.” In Copying with Family Violence: Research and Policy Perspectives. Eds. HotalingG., FinkelholD., KirkpatrickJ., and StrausM.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 169–182.
11.
BuzawaE. and AustinT. (1993). Determining Police Response to Domestic Violence Victims: The Role of Victim Preference.” American Behavioral Scientist36(5): 610–623.
12.
BuzawaE., AustinT., and BuzawaC. (1995). “Responding to Crimes of Violence against Women: Gender Differences vs. Organizational Imperatives.” Crime and Delinquency41(4): 443–466.
13.
BuzawaE., AustinT., and BuzawaC. (1996). “Role of Arrest in Domestic versus Stranger Assault: Is There a Difference?” In Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work? Eds. BuzawaE. and BuzawaC.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 150–175.
14.
DolonR., HendricksJ., and MeagherM. (1986). “Police Practices and Attitudes toward Domestic Violence.” Journal of Police Science and Administration14(3): 187–192.
15.
DuganL. (2003). “Domestic Violence Legislation: Exploring Its Impact on the Likelihood of Domestic Violence, Police Involvement, and Arrest.” Criminology & Public Policy2(2): 283–312.
16.
DunfordF., HuizingaD., and ElliottD. (1990). “Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Police Experiment.” Criminology28(2): 183–206.
17.
ElliotD. (1989). “Criminal Justice Procedures in Family Violence Crimes.” In Family Violence. Eds. TonryM. and MorrisN.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 427–480.
18.
EigenbergH., ScarboroughK., and KappelerV. (1996). “Contributory Factors Affecting Arrest in Domestic and Non-Domestic Assaults.” American Journal of Police15(4): 27–54.
19.
FederL. (1997). “Domestic Violence and Police Response in a Pro-Arrest Jurisdiction.” Women and Criminal Justice8(4): 79–98.
20.
FederL. (1998). “Police Handling of Domestic and Nondomestic Assault Calls: Is There a Case for Discrimination?” Crime & Delinquency44(2): 335–349.
21.
FederL. (2000). “Likelihood of an Arrest Decision for Domestic and Nondomestic Assault Calls: Do Police Underenforce the Law When Responding to Domestic Violence?” In It's Crime: Women and Justice. Eds. MuraskinR.. Upper Saddle Rive, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 311–330.
22.
FelsonR. and AckermanJ. (2001). “Arrest for Domestic and Other Assaults.” Criminology39(3): 655–676.
23.
FinnM, BlackwellB., StalansL., StuddardS.S., and DuganL.L. (2004). “Dual Arrest Decisions in Domestic Violence Cases: The Influence of Departmental Policies.” Crime & Delinquency50(4): 565–589.
24.
FinnM. and StalansL. (2002). “Police Handling of the Mentally Ill in Domestic Violence Situations.” Criminal Justice and Behavior29(3): 278–307.
25.
FyfeJ., KlingerD., and FlavinJ. (1997). “Differential Police Treatment of Male-on-Female Spousal Violence.” Criminology35(3): 455–473.
26.
GrestyB. (1995). “Policing Domestic Violence in the 1990's.” Focus on Police Research and Development6(September): 56–58.
27.
HirschelJ., HutchisonI., DeanC., KelleyJ., and PesackisC. (1991). Charlotte Spouse Assault Replication Project: Final Report. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
28.
HomantR. and KennedyD. (1984). “Content Analysis of Statements about Policewomen's Handling Domestic Violence.” American Journal of Police3(2): 265–283.
29.
HomantR. and KennedyD. (1985). “Police Perceptions of Spouse Abuse: A Comparison of Male and Female Officers.” Journal of Criminal Justice13(1):29–47.
30.
HotalingG. and BuzawaE. (2001). “An Analysis of Assaults in Rural Communities: Final Report.”Washington D.C.: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
31.
KaneR. (1999). “Patterns of Arrest in Domestic Violence Encounters: Identifying a Police Decision-making Model.” Journal of Criminal Justice27(1): 65–79.
32.
KlingerD. (1995). “Policing Spousal Assault.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency32(3): 308–324.
33.
MastrofskiS., ParksR., ReissA., WordenR., DeJongC., SnipesJ., and TerrillW. (1998). Systematic Observation of Public Police: Applying Field Research Methods to Policy Issues. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
34.
MastrofskiS., SnipesJ., ParksR., and MaxwellC. (2000). “The Helping Hand of the Law: Police Control of Citizens on Request.” Criminology38(2): 307–342.
35.
MastrofskiS., WordenR., and SnipesJ. (1995). “Law Enforcement in a Time of Community Policing.” Criminology33(4): 539–563.
36.
OppenlanderN. (1982). “Coping or Copping Out: Police Service Delivery in Domestic Disputes.” Criminology20(3/4): 449–465.
37.
PateA. and HamiltonE. (1992). “Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment.” American Sociological Review57(5): 691–697.
38.
RiksheimE. and ChermakS. (1993). “Causes of Police Behavior Revisited.” Journal of Criminal Justice21(4): 353–382.
39.
RobinsonA. and ChandekM. (2000a). “Differential Police Response to Black Battered Women.” Women & Criminal Justice12(2/3): 29–61.
40.
RobinsonA. and ChandekM. (2000b). “Philosophy into Practice? Community Policing Units and Domestic Violence Victim Participation.” Policing23(3): 280–302.
41.
RobinsonA. and ChandekM. (2000c). “Domestic Violence Arrest Decision: Examining Demographic, Attitudinal, and Situational Variables.” Crime & Delinquency46(1): 18–37.
42.
SandersA. (1988). “Personal Violence and Public Order: The Prosecution of ‘Domestic’ Violence in England and Wales” International Journal of the Sociology of Law16(3): 359–382.
43.
ShermanL. and BerkR. (1984). “Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault.” American Sociological Review49(2): 261–272.
44.
SindenP and StephensJ.J. (1999). “Police Perceptions of Domestic Violence: The Nexus of Victim, Perpetrator, Event, Self and Law.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management22(3): 313–326.
45.
SmithD. (1987). “Police Response to Interpersonal Violence: Defining the Parameters of Legal Control.” Social Forces65(3): 767–782.
46.
SmithD. and KleinJ. (1984). “Police Control of Interpersonal Disputes.” Social Problems31(4): 468–481.
47.
StalansL and FinnM. (2000). “Gender Differences in Officers' Perceptions and Decisions about Domestic Violence Cases.” Women and Criminal Justice11(3): 1–24.
48.
StithS. (1990). “Police Response to Domestic Violence: The Influence of Individual and Familial Factors.” Violence and Victims5(1): 37–49.
49.
SunI. (2003). “A Comparison of Police Field Training Officers' and Non-training Officers' Conflict Resolution Styles: Controlling Versus Supportive Strategies.” Police Quarterly6(1): 22–50.
50.
SunI. and PayneB. (2004). “Racial Differences in Resolving Conflicts: A Comparison between Black and White Police Officers.” Crime and Delinquency50(4): 516–541.
51.
WilsonJ. (1968). The Variety of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
WordenR. (1989). “Situational and Attitudinal Explanations of Police Behavior: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Empirical Assessment.” Law And Society Review23(4): 667–711.
