Measuring Costs of Child Abuse and Neglect: A Mathematic Model of Specific Cost Estimations

Abstract

Few empirical facts exist regarding the actual costs of child abuse in the United States. Consistent data is not available for national or even statewide analysis. Clearly there is a need for such accounting in order to fully understand the damage created by child abuse and neglect. Policy makers and social welfare planners should take child abuse costs into consideration when determining expenditures for prevention and intervention programs. The real savings may far outweigh the costs of such programs when both direct and indirect costs of child abuse and neglect enter into the analysis.

This paper offers a model in which the actual costs of child abuse and neglect, based on direct, indirect, and opportunity costs associated with each case. Direct costs are those associated with the treatment of abused and neglected children as well as the costs of family intervention programs or foster care. Indirect costs are costs to society created by the negative effects of child abuse and neglect evinced by individuals who suffer such abuse and then as teens or adults engage in criminal behavior. Indirect costs also derive from the long term and ongoing health care needs required by victims of abuse, for both physical and mental health disorders. With the existence of this model, the author hopes to stimulate the discussion and desire for better data collection and analysis.

In order to demonstrate the utility of the model, the author has included some cost estimates from the Connecticut State Department of Children and Families and the works of other scholars looking into the question of costs for child abuse and neglect. This data represents the best available at this time. As a result, the model appearing here is specific to Connecticut. Even so, once more valid data becomes available, the model's structure and theoretical framework should adapt to the needs of other states to facilitate better measurement of relevant costs and provide a clearer picture of the utility of investment in the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bethea

Lesa

. (1999) “Primary Prevention of Child Abuse,” American Family Physician, Vol. 59/No. 6.

Caldwell

R.A.

(1992) The costs of child abuse vs. child abuse prevention: Michigan's experience, East Lansing, MI: Michigan Children's Trust Fund.

Centers for Disease Control. (2005) “Asthma Quick Stats,” Morbidity and Mortality Review Weekly, April 29, 2005.

Cicchetti

(1989) Child Maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Dallas Commission on Children and Youth (1988) A Step Towards a Business Plan for Children in Dallas County: Technical Report on Child Abuse and Neglect, available online at www.nij.com.

Daro

(1988) Confronting child abuse: research for effective program design, NY: The Free Press, Macmillan, Inc.

Department of Children and Families, Homepage, Website, (http://www.state.ct.us/dcf/defns.htm.

Geen

. (1999) The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children: Understanding Federal, State, and Local Child Welfare Spending. The Urban Institute.

Giardino

A.P.

. (1999) “Funding Realities: Child abuse Diagnostic Evaluations in the Health Care Setting,” Child Abuse and Neglect, 23 (6): 531–538.

10.

HCUPnet (2003), available online at http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/hcupnet.htm.

11.

Irazuzta

J.E.

. (1997) “Outcome and cost of child abuse,” Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, (8):751–757.

12.

Kempe

Henry C

; Silverman

Frederick

; Droegemueller

William

; and Silver

Henry

. (1962) “The Battered Child Syndrome”, JAMA, 1962; 181; 17–24.

13.

Myles

K.Y

(2002), Disabilities Caused by Child Maltreatment: Incidence, Prevalence and Financial Data.

14.

NIPCA, National Incidence of Prevalence of Child Abuse, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Report of the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, US House of Representatives, 101^st Congress, 1990.

15.

Olds

D.L.

. (1993) “Effect of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on government spending,” Medical Care, 31 (2): 155–174.

16.

Peled

Terry

and Kurtz

Linda

. (1994) “Child Maltreatment: The relationship between development research and public policy,” The American Journal of Family Therapy, 22 (3): 247–262.

17.

Prevent Child Abuse New York. (2001). Causes and consequences: The urgent need to prevent child abuse. Online: www.pca-ny.org/pdf/cancost.pdf. Accessed July 2003.

18.

Sediak

and Broadhurst

(1996) The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: NIS3, United States Department of Health and Human Services.

19.

Walker

Edward

. (1999) “Costs of Health Care Use by Women HMO Members With a History of Childhood Abuse and Neglect,” Archives of General Psychiatry, (56) 609–613.

20.

Wang

Ching Tung

and Daro

Deborah

. Director Prepared by: The Center on Child Abuse Prevention Research, a program of the National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse Working Paper Number 808 NCPCA 200 S. Michigan Avenue 17th Floor Chicago, IL 60604-2404 (312) 663–3520.

21.

Widom

C.S.

(1989) “Child Abuse, Neglect and Adult Behavior: Research Design and Findings on Criminality, Violence and Child Abuse,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatric Association, 59 (3).

22.

United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics. “National Compensation Survey,” October 1999, published July 2000, bulletin 3100–44.