This qualitative case study explored a state health department's relationships with strategic constituencies from a public relations perspective. The relationships were explored within the theoretical framework of the Excellence Theory, the dominant paradigm in public research. Findings indicate application of the Excellence Theory has the potential to increase organizational effectiveness at public health entities. With respect to the case investigated, findings indicate that the state health department could increase its organizational effectiveness through the adoption of recommendations based on the Excellence Theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanL.K. and KolataG. (2001). “Anthrax Missteps Offer Guide to Fight Next Terror.” New York Times (January 6): A1, A14.
2.
CameronK.S. and WhettenD.A. (eds.) (1993). Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1994). “Public Health Core Functions—Alabama, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Wisconsin, (1993.) Retrieved January 6, 2001 from http:/www.dcd.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00023572.
4.
GrunigJ.E. (2000). “Collectivism, Collaboration, and Societal Corporatism as Core Professional Values in Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research12:23–48.
5.
GrunigJ.E. (2002). Qualitative Methods for Assessing Relationships Between Organizations and Publics. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
6.
GrunigL.A., GrunigJ.E., and DozierD.M. (2002). Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication in Three Countries. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
GrunigL.A., GrunigJ.E., and EhlingW.P. (1992). “What is Effective Organization?” in GrunigJ.E. (ed.). Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
GrunigJ.E. and HuangY. (2000). “From Organizational Effectiveness to Relationship Indicators: Antecedents of Relationships, Public Relations Strategies, and Relational Outcomes,” in LedinghamJ.A. and BruningS.D. (eds.). Public Relations as Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations, Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
GrunigJ.E. and HuntT. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
10.
HandlerA.S. and TurnerB.J. (1996). “Local Health Department Effectiveness in Addressing the Core Functions of Public Health Essential Ingredients.” Journal of Public Health Policy17:460–483.
11.
HazeltonV. and KennanW. (2000). “Toward a Social Capital Theory of Public Relationships,” Paper presented at the 3rd annual International Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference, March, Miami, FL.
12.
HonL.C. (1998), “What Have You Done For Me Lately? Exploring Effectiveness in Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research9:1–30.
13.
HonL.C. and GrunigJ.E. (1999). “Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations.”Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations, Commission on PR Management and Evaluation.
14.
Institute of Medicine (1988). The Future of Public Health. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
15.
Institute of Medicine (1997). Improving Health in the Community: A Role for Performance Monitoring. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
16.
Institute of Medicine (2003). The Future of the Public's Health in the 21stCentury. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
17.
KraftK.L., JauchL.R., and BoatwrightE.W. (1996). “Assessing Organizational Effectiveness in the Service Sector.” Journal of Professional Services Marketing14:101–116.
18.
KrepsG.L., BonaguroE.W., and QueryJ.J. (1998). “The History and Development of the Field of Health Communication,” in JacksonL.D. and DuffyB.K. (eds.). Health Communication Research. Westport, CN: Greenwood.
19.
LachmanR. and WolfeR.A. (1997). “The Interface of Organizational Effectiveness and Corporate Social Performance Opportunities for Research and Theory Development.” Business and Society36:194–214.
20.
LewinA.Y. and MintonJ.W. (1996). “Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look and an Agenda for Research.” Management Science32:514–538.
21.
LindoffT.R. (1995). Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MaxwellJ.A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
SeegerM.W. (1997). Ethics and Organizational Communication. Creaskill, NJ: Hampton.
24.
ScottH.D., TierneyJ., and WatersW.Jr. (1990). “The Future of Public Health: A Survey of the States.” Journal and Public Health Policy11:296–304.
25.
ScutchfieldF.D.. (1997). “A Survey of State Health Department Compliance with the Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine Report, The Future of Public Health.” Journal of Public Health Policy18:13–29.
26.
Schutchfield. (1997). “Compliance with the Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine Report, The Future of Public Health.“Journal of Public Health Policy16:304–323.
27.
StotoM.A., AbelC., and DievlerA. (1996). Healthy Communities: New Partnerships for the Future of Public Health. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
28.
TothE. (1992). “The Case for Pluralistic Studies of Public Relations: Rhetorical, Critical, and Systems Perspectives,” in TothE.L. and HeathR.I. (eds.). Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
TurnockB.J. (2001). Public Health: What It Is and How It Works, 2nd ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
30.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health, 2nd ed. Washing-ton, D.C.: Author.
31.
WallS. (1998). “Transformations in Public Health Systems.” Health Affairs17:64–80.
32.
YinR.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
