Health care mergers have become the organizational strategy of choice in the 20th century to contain costs and to survive economically. Several studies have been conducted on the economic impact of mergers on the organization and on the managerial staff of merged organizations. Areas where there has been limited research are in the realm of the impact of mergers on the employees, the industry, and the public. To address these areas, a study was conducted of the perceptions of health care administrators of both merged and non-merged organizations in the state of Florida
A primary finding of the study was that administrators of merged organizations held a higher opinion of the benefits of mergers in their organizations and in the industry than did administrators in non-merged organizations. An unanticipated finding of the impact of mergers was that the increased competition has created a wary, hostile environment for administrators, many of whom refused to participate in this study believing it was being conducted by their competition. The rationale for mergers in health care is based on the market value of competition and future research needs to focus more on the unintended consequences of competition in health care to which this study points.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Associated Press (1999) “Sale of Two Hospitals Raises Antitrust Concerns.” Florida Today (April 26): 5B.
2.
BabbieE. (1998). The Practice of Social Research!Belmont. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
BastienD. T. (1994). “A Feedback Loop Model of Post-merger Performance.” Management Communication Quarterly8(1): 46–70.
5.
BastienD. T. (1987). “Common Patterns of Behavior and Communication in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Human Resource Management Journal23 (1): 17–34.
6.
BlecherM. B. (1998). “Size Does Matter.” Hospital Health Networks72(12): 28–34.
7.
BlenderR. J., BrodieM.. BensonJ. M., AltmanG. E., LevittL., HoffT., and HugickL. (1998). “Understanding the Managed Care Backlash-” Health Affairs17(4): 80–94.
8.
BlumenthalD. (1999), “Health Care Reform at the Ends of the 20th Century,” New England Journal of Medicine340(24): 1916–1920.
9.
BodenheimerT. (1999). “The American Health Care System: Physicians and the Changing Medical Marketplace.” New England Journal of Medicine340(7): 584–588.
10.
BondP. and WeissmanR. (1997). “The Cost of Mergers and Acquisitions in the U. S. Health Care Sector.” International Journal of Health Service27(1):77–87.
11.
BrooksO. R. and JonesG. V. (1997). “Hospital Mergers and Market Overlap” Health Services Research31(6):701–721.
12.
BurtonT. M. (1999). “Health-care Assessment Finds Reputation and Reality Don't Necessarily Match.” Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition (April 22). Available: http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retr.
13.
ButlerPA. (1995). Implications of Health Care Competition for Cost, Choice, Quality, and Innovation: The Role of Health Plan Mergers.”Portland: National Academy for State health Policy.
14.
ButlerO. A. (1998). Is Bigger Better? Legal and Policy Issues in Health Plan Mergers: A Guide for State Health Policy Makers.Portland. ME: National Academy for State health Policy.
15.
ConnorR. A. R. D, Feldman, and DowdB.H. (1998). “The Effects of Market Concentration and Horizontal Mergers on Hospital Costs and Prices.” International Journal of Business5(2): 159–190.
16.
“Forbes Platinum List -Health Care Services” (1999). Forties163(1): 182.
17.
Gin/bergK. (1990). The Medical Triangle: Physicians. Politicians, and the Public.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
18.
GreeneJ. (1990). “Do Mergers Work'. '” Modern Healthcare20(11): 24–34.
19.
GreeneJ. (1992). “Hie Costs of Hospital Mergers.” Modern Healthcare22(5): 36–42.
20.
Oul/arL, (1999). “Access to Health Care.” Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship.
21.
HayesJ. R. (1997). “Annual Report on American Industry: Health. “l-'orbes159(1). 166–169.
HellingerF. J. (1998). “Anlilrust Enforcement in the Healthcare Industry: The Expanding Scope of State Activity.” HSR: Health Services Research31 (5)• 1477–1494.
24.
KassirerJ. P. (1996). “Mergers and Acquisitions: Who Benefits? Who Loses?” New England Journal of Medicine334(11):722–723.
25.
KovnerC. and GergenP. J. (1998). “Nurse Staffing levels and Adverse Events Following Surgery in U. S. Hospitals.” IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship30(4): 315–320.
26.
KutnerR. (1999). “The American Health Care System: Wall Street and Health Care.” New England Journal of Medicine340(8): 664–668.
27.
MarksM. and MirvisP. (1985). “Merger Syndrome: Stress and Uncertainty.” Mergers and Acquisitions (Summer): 50–55.
28.
MirvisP. and MarksM. (1986). “Merger Syndrome: Management by Crisis.” Mergers and Acquisitions (Winter): 70–76.
29.
MontagueJ. (1997). “Dealbreakers — Lost in the East Ijne,” Hospitals & Health Networks71(4): 34.
30.
“News at Deadline — Public Citizen: Mergers Hurt Health Care,” (1996). Hospitals and Health Networks70(13): 47.
31.
PermanS, and Van TasselJ. (1996). “A Healthy Merger? A Big Deal Makes Aetna the Country's largest Health-care Company.” Time147(16): 77–78.
32.
PetersonM. A. (1993), “Political Influence in the 1990s: From Iron Triangle to Policy Networks”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law18(2): 3990438.
33.
SchweigerD. and DiNisiA. (1991). “Communication with Employees Following a Merger: A Longitudinal Field Experiment.” Academy of Management Journal: 110–135.
SunshineN. and GoldsteinS. (1997). “Litigated Mergers Enforcers Shut Out.” National Journal (March 31).
36.
TerhuneC. (1999). “Reliance on Medicare Means Intense Pain for State's Hospitals.” H a l l Street Journal Interactive — Florida Journal (July 21). Available: http://interactnewsj.com.documents;fl01.htm.
37.
WilliamsJ. and FeldmanM. (1986). “Life after Merger: The Human Resource Factor” Health Care Forum (September October): 33–37.
