Judges' Knowledge About Sexual Offenders,Difficulties Presiding Over Sexual Offense Cases,and Opinions on Sentencing,Treatment,and Legislation

Abstract

Forty-two Midwestern trial judges responded to a survey designed to assess knowledge about sexual offenders; attitudes toward adjudication, sentencing, treatment, and release; and opinions regarding sexual offender-related legislation. Results indicated that the judges held a variety of beliefs regarding the etiology and dynamics involved in sexual offending which differ from those of most professionals in the field of sexual offender management. However, the judges accurately identified important issues related to victims and some myths about offenders. The importance of retribution and rehabilitation for sexual offenders was emphasized, and considerable support was revealed for controversial legislative issues such as community notification, mandatory registration, and civil commitment of sexual predators. Of particular interest is the finding that, compared to other cases, sexual offense cases were rated by judges as more difficult over which to preside from a legal and technical standpoint, a personal and emotional viewpoint, and a public scrutiny and public pressure perspective. These issues, as well as judges' comments on current systemic and decision-making difficulties, are discussed in terms of the importance of judicial education programs and future research.

Keywords

judicial decision making sentencing sexual offending.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Center for Effective Public Policy (1996). Strategies to promote public safety through the effective management ofsex offenders in the community: Recommendations to the Office of Justice Programs from the National Summit Working Groups. Unpublished manuscript.

Henry, F. (1996). Survey results set agenda for public policy. Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers: The Forum, 8(2), 1-2.

Karpman, B. (1954). The sexual offender and his offenses: Etiology, pathology, psychopathology, and treatment. New York: Julian Press.

Klotz, J.A. , Wexler, D.B. , Sales, B.D. , & Becker, J.V. (1992). Cognitive restructuring through law: A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to sex offenders and the plea process. University of Puget Sound Law Review, 15, 579-595.

Schwartz, B.K. , & Cellini, H.R. (1997). The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations, and legal developments. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.

Weekes, J.R. , Pelletier, G. , & Beaudette, D. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 55-61.

Wexler, D.B. , & Winick, B.J. (1992). Therapeutic jurisprudence and criminal justice mental health issues. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter , 16, 225-231.