Empirical tests of the reliability and validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias (AAIP) as used with juvenile sexual offenders were performed. Testretest reliability, screening validity, and diagnostic validity were assessed using several analytical approaches. The temporal stability, sensitivity, and specificity of the AAIP as used with adolescents in residential and day treatment were not demonstrated. The results indicate the need for further refinement of the AAIP.
Abel, G.G. (1995). Abel Screening system manual. Atlanta, GA: Abel Screening Inc.
2.
Abel, G.G. (1997). Memorandum, 11/12/97. Atlanta, GA: Abel Screening Inc.
3.
Abel, G.G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B.W., & Holland, C.L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 81-85.
4.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Brown, M., Amoroso, D.M., Ware, E.E., Pruesse, M., & Pilkey, D.W. (1973). Factors affecting viewing time of pornography . Journal of Social Psychology, 90, 125-135.
6.
Clemens, W.V. (1956). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures. Psychometric Monographs, 14.
7.
Fischer, L., & Smith, G.M. (1999). Statistical adequacy of the Abel Assessment for Interest in Paraphilias. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 195-205.
8.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., & Chaplin, T.C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 389-394.
9.
Hayes, W.L., (1981). Statistics. New YorkCBSCollege.
10.
Johnson, S.A., & Listiak, A. (1998). The measurement of sexual preference: A preliminary comparison of phallometry and the Abel Assessment. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Vancouver, Canada, Oct.
11.
Love, R.E., Sloan, L.R., & Schmidt, M.J. (1976). Viewing pornography and sex guilt: The priggish, the prudent, and the profligate. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 624-629.
12.
Quinsey, V.L., Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., & Reid, K.S. (1993). Conceptual and measurement issues in the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of sexual age preferences in males. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall , & S. M. Hudson, (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 143-163). New York: Guilford.
13.
Quinsey, V.L., Earls, C., Ketsetzis, M., & Karamanoukian, A. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 341-354.
14.
Rosenweig, S. (1942). The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 150-158.
15.
Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction . The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230-240
16.
Ware, E.E., Brown, M., Amoroso, D.M., Pilkey, D.W., & Pruesse, M. (1972). The semantic meaning of pornographic stimuli for college males. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 4, 204-209.
17.
Weinberg, S., & Goldberg, K. (1990). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Wienrott, M.R. (1996). Juvenile sexual aggression: A critical review . Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
19.
Wright, L. w., & Adams, H.E. (1994). Assessment and sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 221-231.
20.
Zamasky, H.S. (1956). A technique for measuring homosexual tendencies . Journal of Personality, 24, 436-448.
