Evaluating Treatment Efficacy with Searual Offenders: The Insensitivity of Recidivism Studies to Treatment Effects

Abstract

Treatment programs for sexual offenders have been implemented in prison settings with the objective of reducing recidivism among released offenders. Reviews of the literature evaluating the efficacy of treatment have not found convincing evidence that institutional treatment reduces recidivism. However, these reviews have been most concerned with the possibility of a Type I error in hypothesis testing: specifically, that we might reject the null hypothesis when it is true, concluding that recidivism among treated offenders has been reduced compared with that of untreated offenders and concluding that treatment is effective when it is not. The present paper explores the risks of Type II error by examining the sensitivity of recidivism studies to treatment effects and the power of statistical tests of treatment hypotheses in recidivism studies. Using a series of "what if" analyses and power calculations, the sensitivity of statistical hypothesis testing was explored in recidivism studies under a variety of N's, base rates, and treatment effects. The size of treatment effects required for significance at the p < .05 level at various N's and base rates was calculated and the N required to obtain significance at the p < .05 level in the "average" recidivism study was estimated. This paper examines the sensitivity of statistical hypothesis testing in three of the most oft-cited recidivism studies of institutional sexual offender treatment. Recidivism studies were found to be quite insensitive to the effects of treatment and these findings are discussed with respect to the likelihood of a Type II error. Alternative methods of assessing sexual offender treatment efficacy are described and recommended

Keywords

offender treatment outcome research sexual offending study design.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews, D.A. , Zinger, I. , Hoge, R.D. , Bonta, J. , Gendreau, P. , & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology , 28, 369-417.

Blossfeld, H.P. , Hamerle, A. , & Mayer, K.U. (1989). Event history analysis: Statistical theory and application in the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bochnewich, M.A. (1992). Prediction of dangerousness and Washington's sexually violent predator statute. California Western Law Review, 29, 277-306.

Brown, B.W. , Chan, A. , Gutierrez, D. , Herson, J. , Lovato, J. , & Polsley, J. (1990). STPLAN. Version 3: Calculations for sample sizes and related problems. Houston: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 65, 145-153.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.

Fein, B. , & Martone, E. (1995). Megan's law: When a sex offender moves in, is there a duty to warn the community. American Bar Association Journal, 3 (March), 38-39.

Furby, L. , Weinrott, M.R. , & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3-30.

Gigerenzer, G. , & Murray, D.J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

10.

Hallahan, M. , & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Statistical power: Concepts, procedures, and applications . Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 489-499.

11.

Hanson, R.K. , Cox, B. , & Woszcyna, C. (1991). Assessing treatment outcome for sexual offenders . Annals of Sex Research, 4, 177-208.

12.

Hanson, R.K. , Steffy, R.A. , & Gauthier, R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646-652.

13.

Hays, W.L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. 734-735). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

14.

Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

15.

Marques, J.K. (1995). How to answer the question, "Does sex offender treatment work?" Paper presented at the International Expert Conference on Sex Offenders, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Sept.

16.

Marques, J. , Day, D.M. , Nelson, C. , & West, M.A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28-54.

17.

Marques, J. , Nelson, C. , West, M.A. , & Day, D.M. (1994). The relationship between treatment goals and recidivism among child molesters. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 577-588.

18.

Marshall, W.L. , & Barbaree, H.E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behavior Research and Therapy, 26, 499-511.

19.

Marshall, W.L. , & Barbaree, H.E. (1990). Outcome of comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment programs. In W. L. Marshall , D. R. Laws , & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues. theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 363-385). New York: Plenum.

20.

Marshall, W.L. , Jones, R. , Ward, T. , Johston, P. , & Barbaree, H.E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465-485.

21.

Marshall, W.L. , Hudson, S.M. , Ward, T. , & Fernandez, Y.M. (1996). Sourcebook of trearment programs with sex offenders. New York: Plenum Press (in press).

22.

Miner, M.H. , Marques, J.K. , Day, D.M. , & Nelson, C. (1990). Impact of relapse prevention in treating sex offenders: Preliminary findings. Annals of Sex Research, 3, 165-185.

23.

Nagayama, H. , & Gordon, C. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psycholosy, 63, 503-809.

24.

Rice, M.E. , Harris, G.T. , & Quinsey, V.L. (1991). Evaluation of an institutional based treatment program for child molesters. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 11, 111-129.

25.

Quinsey, V.L. , Harris, G.T. , Rice, M.E. , & Lalumiere, M.L. (1993). Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 512-523.

26.

Quinsey, V.L. , Khanna, A. , & Malcolm, B. (1996). A retrospective evaluation of the RTC sex offender treatment program. Paper presented to the World Congress of Psychology, Montreal, Aug.