Sex Attitudes and Prior Victimization as Predictors of College Student Sex Offenses

Abstract

A sample of 796 college student volunteers in Human Sexuality and Introductory Psychology classes were surveyed anonymously about sexual attitudes, experience, and knowledge. The survey measured attitude variables found previously to predict attitudes toward forcible date rape (Fischer, 1986) and behavioral measures, such as sexual experience and sexual abuse as a child, teenager, or adult. Survey variables wre related to two types of self-reported sexual offenders: (a) those who admitted to use of lies or false promises to have sex (N=69) and/or (b) those who admitted to use of threat or force to have sex (N=16). Logistic regression and discriminant analyses revealed that male gender, a tendency to blame society, rather than the male, in a date rape vignette, more accepting attitudes toward forcible date rape, having used threat or force to have sex and greater sexual experience, including same gender sexual experience, identified 71% of students admitting to having lied or made false promises to have sex. Only two variables (blaming society or the situation, rather than the male, in a date rape vignette and some likelihood of rape, if sure of not being caught) identified 73% of forcible male sex offenders. Prior victimization did not relate to either type of sex offending. Thus, Groth's (1979) explanation of forcible sexual assault as an expression of internal developmental crisis (resulting from prior sexual abuse) was not supported.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ageton, S.S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington. MA; D.C. Heath.

Fischer, G.J. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible date rape: 1. Cognitive predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 15, 457-466.

Fischer, G.J. (1991). Is lesser severity of child abuse a reason more males report having liked it? Annals of Sex Research, 4, 131-139.

Garland, RJ , & Dougher, M.J. (1990). The abused/abuser hypothesis of child sexual abuse: A critical review of theory and research. In J.R Feierman (Ed.), Pedophilia (pp.488-509). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Giarruso, R. , Johnson, P. , Goodchilds, J. , & Zellman, G. (1979). Adolescent cues and signals: Sex and assault. Paper presented at meetings of the Western Psychological Association , in San Diego.

Groth. N. (1979). Men who rape. New York Plenum Press.

Kanin, E.J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 219-231.

Koss. M.P. , & Leonard, K.E. (1984). Sexually aggressive men: Findings and theoretical implications. In N., Malamuth and E. Donnerstein (Eds.). Pornography and Sexual Aggression. Orlando: Academic Press

Mahoney, E.R. , Shiveley, M.D. , & Traw, M. (1988). Sexual coercion and assault: Male socialization and female risk. Sexual Coercion & Assault, 1, 2-8.

10.

Malamuth, N.M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 87, 138-157.

11.

Rappaport, K. , & Burkhart, B.R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216-221.

12.

Spence, J.T. , Helmreich, R. , & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219-220.