Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
The Discriminatory Power of Correlates of Admission of Sexual Interest in Children (CASIC) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) Offenses
The Correlates of Admission of Sexual Interest in Children (CASIC) is a six-item proxy measure of sexual interest in children in individuals involved with child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) based on behavioral characteristics. Originally developed to replace the sexual interest item of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT) when information is missing, some evidence suggests that the CASIC may also be useful for broader risk assessment purposes. This study examined the ability of the CASIC to identify CSEM recidivism among individuals with a history of CSEM offenses. In a sample of 126 individuals incarcerated for CSEM offenses and released from the Austrian prison system between 2002 and 2019, the CASIC total score was associated with CSEM recidivism (Harrell’s C = .75, 95% CI [.63, .87]). This association remained consistent in a subsample with fixed 5-year follow-up periods (n = 103, AUC = .77, 95% CI [.64, .89]). Our findings highlight the ability of the CASIC to reliably assess sexual interest in children as a risk factor for CSEM offending, which may support risk management and treatment planning.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
2.
BabchishinK. M.DibayulaS.McCullochC.HansonR. K.HelmusL. M. (2023). ACUTE-2007 and STABLE-2007 predict recidivism for men adjudicated for child sexual exploitation material offending. Law and Human Behavior, 47(5), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000540
3.
BabchishinK. M.EkeA. W.LeeC. S.LewisN.SetoM. C. (2022). Applying offending trajectory analyses to men adjudicated for child sexual exploitation material offenses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(8), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211040849
4.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.VanZuylenH. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x
5.
BabchishinK. M.Karl HansonR.HermannC. A. (2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 23(1), 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370708
6.
BabchishinK. M.MerdianH. L.BartelsR. M.PerkinsD. (2018). Child sexual exploitation materials offenders. European Psychologist, 23(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000326
7.
BeechA. R.WardT. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(1), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.002
8.
BiedermannL.EherR.RettenbergerM.GaunersdorferK.TurnerD. (2023). Are mental disorders associated with recidivism in men convicted of sexual offenses?Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 148(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13547
9.
BlanchardR.KollaN. J.CantorJ. M.KlassenP. E.DickeyR.KubanM. E.BlakT. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse, 19(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900307
10.
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M. (2015). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568114
11.
CooperA. (1998). Sexuality and the internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187
EherR.MatthesA.SchillingF.Haubner-MacLeanT.RettenbergerM. (2012). Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: An investigation of predictive and incremental validity. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211403164
15.
EherR.OlverM. E.HeurixI.SchillingF.RettenbergerM. (2015). Predicting reoffense in pedophilic child molesters by clinical diagnoses and risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 39(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000144
16.
EkeA. W.BabchishinK. M.PaquetteS.ScottS. B.BatinicM.FortinF.SetoM. C. (2024). Comparing the Static-99R and the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT) in two Canadian samples adjudicated of child sexual exploitation material offenses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 95(2024), 102303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102303
17.
EkeA. W.HelmusL. M.SetoM. C. (2018). Scoring guide for the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Version 2. [Unpublished manual].
18.
EkeA. W.HelmusL. M.SetoM. C. (2019). A validation study of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218762434
FaitakisM.StephensS.SetoM. C. (2023). The predictive validity of the revised screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI-2). Sexual Abuse, 35(5), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632221149696
21.
FieldA.FieldZ.MilesJ. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage Publications.
GeijerM.BåthM.WessmanC. (2025). Some common statistical methods for assessing rater agreement in radiological studies. Acta Radiologica, 66(6), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251319666
24.
HansonR. K. (2022). Prediction statistics for psychological assessment. American Psychological Association.
25.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.348
26.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J.ScottT.-L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project (Bd. 5, Nummer 6). Public Safety Canada Ottawa.
27.
HansonR. K.LeeS. C.ThorntonD. (2024). Long term recidivism rates among individuals at high risk to sexually reoffend. Sexual Abuse, 36(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632221139166
28.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis 2004-02. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
29.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.115
30.
HelmusL. M.EkeA. W.FarmusL.SetoM. C. (2024). The CPORT and risk matrix 2000 for men convicted of child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) offenses: A predictive accuracy comparison and meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231208194
31.
HelmusL. M.EkeA. W.SetoM. C. (2025). What risk assessment tools can be used with men convicted of child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) offenses? Recommendations from a review of current research. Law and Human Behavior, 49(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000594
32.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD. (2015). Stability and predictive and incremental accuracy of the individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R in predicting sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(9), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814568891
33.
JahnkeS.ImhoffR.HoyerJ. (2015). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0312-4
34.
KhanM.BrandenburgerT. (2020). _ROCit: Performance assessment of binary classifier with visualization_. R package version 2.1.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ROCit
35.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage.
36.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
37.
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.FernaneS.FernandezY. M.NunesK. L.CantorJ. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
38.
NakasC. T.BantisL. E.GatsonisC. A. (2023). ROC analysis for classification and prediction in practice. CRC Press.
39.
R Core Team, A. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
40.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
41.
SavoieV.QuayleE.FlynnE.O’RourkeS. (2022). Predicting risk of reoffending in persons with child sexual exploitation material offense histories: The use of child pornography offender risk tool in a scottish population. Sexual Abuse, 34(5), 568–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047190
42.
SchmidtA. F.BabchishinK. M.LehmannR. J. B. (2016). A meta-analysis of viewing time measures of sexual interest in children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0806-3
43.
SchmidtA. F.BanseR.ImhoffR. (2015). Indirect measures in forensic contexts. In OrtnerT. M.van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Behavior-based assessment: Going beyond self-report in the personality, affective, motivation, and social domains (pp. 173–194). Hogrefe.
44.
SchmidtA. F.GykiereK.VanhoeckK.MannR. E.BanseR. (2013). Direct and indirect measures of sexual maturity preferences differentiate subtypes of child sexual abusers. Sexual Abuse, 26(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213480817
45.
SeiserA.EherR.HelmusL. M.TurnerD.RettenbergerM. (2025). The psychometric properties of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT) in different subgroups of individuals convicted of offenses related to child sexual exploitation material (CSEM). Law and Human Behavior, 49(5), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000616
46.
SetoM. C. (2018). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children. Theory, assessment, intervention (2nd ed.). American Psychology Association.
SetoM. C.AugustynC.RocheK. M.HilkesG. (2023). Empirically-based dynamic risk and protective factors for sexual offending. Clinical Psychology Review, 106, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102355
49.
SetoM. C.CantorJ. M.BlanchardR. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(3), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
50.
SetoM. C.EkeA. W. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000128
51.
SetoM. C.EkeA. W. (2017). Correlates of admitted sexual interest in children among individuals convicted of child pornography offenses. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000240
52.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse, 13(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300103
53.
SetoM. C.LalumièreM. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019700
54.
SetoM. C.SandlerJ. C.FreemanN. J. (2017). The revised screening scale for pedophilic interests: Predictive and concurrent validity. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618375
55.
SetoM. C.StephensS.LalumièreM. L.CantorJ. M. (2017). The revised screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI–2): Development and criterion-related validation. Sexual Abuse, 29(7), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612444
56.
SielaffS. S.EherR.EtzlerS.RettenbergerM. (2025). Cross-validation of the German version of the revised screening scale for pedophilic interests (SSPI-2). Manuscript submitted for publication.
57.
SoldinoV.Carbonell-VayáE. J.Seigfried-SpellarK. C. (2021). Spanish validation of the child pornography offender risk tool. Sexual Abuse, 33(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220928958
58.
SteelC. M.NewmanE.O’RourkeS.QuayleE. (2021). Collecting and viewing behaviors of child sexual exploitation material offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 118, 105133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105133
59.
SteelC. M. S.NewmanE.O’RourkeS.QuayleE. (2023). Lawless space theory for online child sexual exploitation material offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 68, 101809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101809
von FranquéF.Bergner-KoetherR.SchmidtS.PellowskiJ. S.PetersJ. H.HajakG.BrikenP. (2023). Individuals under voluntary treatment with sexual interest in minors: What risk do they pose?Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1277225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1277225
