The accuracy of risk assessment tools for Asian populations has received relatively little research attention. This study evaluated one of the most widely used static risk assessment tools - Static-99R - for assessing the likelihood of recidivism among men convicted of a sexual crime in South Korea. Overall, this South Korean sample (N = 8207) appeared to have a higher risk (more paraphilic interests, more sexual/general criminality) than the Static-99R normative samples (who were mostly White individuals from Western countries). Despite the differences, Static-99R was able to discriminate recidivists from nonrecidivists in South Korea, with AUC values similar to that observed in the normative samples (e.g., 0.72 for sexual recidivism). In terms of calibration, the observed sexual recidivism rates of the current sample were higher than the international routine/complete normative samples but lower than the high-risk/high-need normative samples (E/O = 0.75 and 1.26, respectively). Consequently, evaluators in South Korea can have reasonable confidence in the ability of Static-99R to rank individuals according to their relative likelihood of sexual recidivism.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.) Routledge.
2.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis (2nd ed.) John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BourgonG.MugfordR.HansonR. K.ColigadoM. (2018). Offender risk assessment practices vary across Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(2), 167–205. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2016-0024
4.
BrankleyA. E.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K. (2021). Stable-2007 demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 33(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871572
5.
BrankleyA. E.HelmusL. M.HansonR. K. (2017). Stable-2007 evaluator workbook: Updated recidivism rates (includes combinations with Static-99R, Static-2002R, and Risk Matrix 2000). Public Safety Canada.
6.
Brouillette-AlarieS.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HelmusL.-M. (2016). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and static-2002R: A three-factor solution. Assessment, 23(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568114
7.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse, 30(6), 676–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217691965
8.
CampbellM. A.FrenchS.GendreauP. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809333610
9.
ChouldechovaA. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data, 5(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0047
10.
De MenteB. L. (2012). The Korean mind: Understanding contemporary Korean culture. Tuttle Publishing.
GonçalvesL. C.GerthJ.RosseggerA.NollT.EndrassJ. (2020). Predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-99R in Switzerland. Sexual Abuse, 32(2), 203–219. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063218821117
HansonR. K. (2022). Prediction statistics for psychological assessment. American Psychological Association.
15.
HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.PhenixA. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion-referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000371
16.
HansonR. K.BroomI. (2005). The utility of cumulative meta-analysis: Application to programs for reducing sexual violence. Sexual Abuse, 17(4), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700402
17.
HansonR. K.BussièreM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.348
18.
HansonR. K.LloydC. D.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2012). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Percentile ranks for the Static-99/R and Static-2002/R sexual offender risk scales. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.667511
19.
HansonR.K.LunettaA.PhenixA.NeelyJ.EppersonD. (2014). The field validity of Static-99R sex offender risk assessment tool in California. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000014
20.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
21.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333
22.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD.HelmusL.-M.BabchishinK. M. (2016). What sexual recidivism rates are associated with Static-99R and static-2002R scores?Sexual Abuse, 28(3), 218–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215574710
HarrisA. J. R.PhenixA.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Static-99 coding rules: Revised 2003. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
25.
HazamaK.KatsutaS.TanakaK. (2014). Predictive ability of risk assessment tools for recidivism among sexual offenders on probation and parole in Japan [Poster presentation]. In The 13th conference of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders. IATSO.
26.
HelmusL. M.BabchishinK. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816678898
27.
HelmusL. M.HansonR. K.MurrieD. C.ZabarauckasC. L. (2021a). Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4, 433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 33(7), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001010
28.
HelmusL. M.KelleyS. M.FrazierA.FernandezY. M.LeeS. C.RettenbergerM.BoccacciniM. T. (2022). Static-99R: Strengths, limitations, predictive accuracy meta-analysis, and legal admissibility review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000351
HelmusL.-M.ThorntonD. (2015). Stability and predictive and incremental accuracy of the individual items of Static-99R and static-2002R in predicting sexual recidivism: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(9), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814568891
31.
HelmusL. M.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 64–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211409951
32.
HillD.DemetrioffS. (2019). Clinical-forensic psychology in Canada: A survey of practitioner characteristics, attitudes, and psychological assessment practices. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 60(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000152
33.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584. https//doi.org/10.1086/227905
JoE. (2010). Development of Hallym Assessment Guide for Sex Offender Risk (HAGSOR). Ministry of Justice.
36.
KelleyS. M.AmbroziakG.ThorntonD.BarahalR. M. (2020). How do professionals assess sexual recidivism risk? An updated survey of practices. Sexual Abuse, 32(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218800474
37.
KimJ.KimY.OhH.LeeJ.KangJ. (2020). An evaluation research on the effectiveness of punitiveness(I): Sex offender registration and notification. Korean Institute of Criminology.
38.
Korean Institute of Criminology. (2020). Crimes and criminal justice Policy in Korea.
39.
LamS. (2021). Same vs. differences: Risk and needs profiles of persons - in- custody with sexual convictions in Hong Kong in comparison to the west [paper presentation]. In The 16th conference of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders. Frankfurt, Germany.
40.
LeeS. C.HansonR. K.ZabarauckasC. L. (2018). Sex offenders of east Asian heritage resemble other Canadian sex offenders. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9252-y
41.
LeeS.KoR.ParkH. (2008). Development of the Korean sex offender risk assessment Scale (KSORAS) and its validity evidences. Korean Criminology Review, 19(4), 309–345. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2008.20.4.309
42.
LeeS. C.HansonR. K. (2017). Similar predictive accuracy of the Static-99R risk tool for white, black, and hispanic sex offenders in California. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(9), 1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817711477
43.
LeeS. C.HansonR. K. (2021). Updated 5-year and new 10-year sexual recidivism rate norms for Static-99R with routine/complete samples. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000436
44.
LeeS. C.HansonR. K.BlaisJ. (2020a). Predictive accuracy of the Static-99R and Static-2002R risk tools for identifying Indigenous and White individuals at high risk for sexual recidivism in Canada. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000182
45.
LeeS. C.HansonR. K.CalkinsC.JeglicE. (2020b). Paraphilia and antisociality: Motivations for sexual offending may differ for American whites and blacks. Sexual Abuse, 32(3), 335–365. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063219828779
46.
LeguizamoA.LeeS. C.JeglicE. L.CalkinsC. (2017). Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R with latino sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 29(8), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215618377
47.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyE. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Safer Society Press.
48.
McGrathR. J.LasherM. P.CummingG. F. (2012). The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS) psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with Static-99R. Sexual Abuse, 24(5), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063211432475
MyerA. J. (2019). Examining the predictive validity of the Static-99R on native American sex offenders. Justice Evaluation Journal, 2(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1636614
52.
National Court Administration. (2018). 2018 judicial yearbook.
53.
NealT. M. S.GrissoT. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548449
54.
NiazU.HassanS. (2006). Culture and mental health of women in South-East Asia. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association, 5(2), 118–120.
OlverM. E.WongS. C.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological assessment, 19(3), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
58.
PhenixA.HelmusL.HansonR. K. (2016). Static-99R & Static-2002R evaluators’ workbook.
59.
RaymondB. C.McEwanT. E.DavisM. R.ReevesS. G.OgloffJ. R. (2021). Investigating the predictive validity of Static-99/99R scores in a sample of older sexual offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767714
60.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
61.
ReynoldsC. R.SuzukiL. A. (2013). Bias in psychological assessment: An empirical review and recommendations. In GrahamJ. R.NaglieriJ. A.WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (pp. 82–113). John Wiley & Sons.
62.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
63.
RoystonP.MoonsK. G.AltmanD. G.VergouweY. (2009). Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. British Medical Journal, 338(mar31 1), 1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b604
64.
RuscioJ. (2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19
StephensS.NewmanJ. E.CantorJ. M.SetoM. C. (2018). The Static-99R predicts sexual and violent recidivism for individuals with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2017.1372936
SwetsJ. A.DawesR. M.MonahanJ. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001
TherneauT. (2020). Package “survival” Version 3.1-11. [Computer software].
72.
TsaoI. T.ChuC. M. (2021). An exploratory study of recidivism risk assessment instruments for individuals convicted of sexual offenses in Singapore. Sexual Abuse, 33(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219884575
73.
TullyR.ChouS.BrowneK.D. (2013). A systematic review on the effectiveness of sex offender risk assessment tools in predicting sexual recidivism of adult male sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(2), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.12.002
74.
Van de VijverF.TanzerN. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 54(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
75.
VarelaJ. G.BoccacciniM. T.MurrieD. C.CapertonJ. D.GonzalezE.Jr. (2013). Do the Static-99 and Static-99R perform similarly for white, black, and latino sexual offenders?The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12(4), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2013.846950
76.
ViallonV.RagusaS.Clavel-ChapelonF.BénichouJ. (2009). How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool. Statistics in Medicine, 28(6), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3517
77.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
78.
WatanabeK.YokotaK.YoshimotoK.IharaN.FujitaG. (2007). Recidivism in child rapists: Identifying high risk factors. National Research Institute of Police Science.
79.
YangM.WongS. C.CoidJ. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020473
80.
YehC. J.HuangK. (1996). The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students. Adolescence, 31(123), 645–661.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
