BertoleroM. A.DworkinJ. D.DavidS. U., et al. (2020). Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.12.336230.
3.
BuchananN. T.PerezM.PrinsteinM. J.ThurstonI. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. The American Psychologist, 76(7), 1097–1112. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000905.
4.
DiemerM. A.MistryR. S.WadsworthM. E.LópezI.ReimersF. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 77–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12001.
5.
FanniffA.AlexanderA. (forthcoming). Improving justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion in research on sexual abuse perpetration. Sexual Abuse.
6.
GintherD. K.BasnerJ.JensenU.SchnellJ.KingtonR.SchafferW. T. (2018). Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards. Plos One, 13(11), Article e0205929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205929.
7.
HelmsJ. E. (2007). Some better practices for measuring racial and ethnic identity constructs. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.235
8.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
9.
HoppeT. A.LitovitzA.WillisK. A.MeserollR. A.PerkinsM. J.HutchinsB. I.SantangeloG. M. (2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), eaaw7238. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238.
10.
MillerA. L.SternC.NevilleH. (2019). Forging diversity‐science‐informed guidelines for research on race and racism in psychological science. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1240-1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12356.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115.
13.
SchudsonZ. C.BeischelW. J.van AndersS. M. (2019). Individual variation in gender/sex category definitions. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 6(4), 448. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/sgd0000346.
WillisG. M.LetourneauE. J. (2018). Promoting accurate and respectful language to describe individuals and groups. Sexual Abuse, 30(5), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1079063218783799.