Sexism,Moral Disengagement,and Dark Triad Traits on Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Women and Community Men

Abstract

The field of criminal psychology involves delving into psychological profiles prone to accepting and justifying sexist attitudes that support sexual violence against adult women (SVAW). The aim of the current study is to analyze the mediating role of moral disengagement in the relationships between dark triad personality traits (Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism) and ambivalent sexism in a sample of 74 male perpetrators of sexual violence against women (M = 40.58; SD = 10.05) convicted of intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual assault and 160 community men (M = 43.54; SD = 10.63). Since there were no significant differences in the measured variables between individuals convicted of IPV and those convicted of sexual assault, these two groups were combined into a single group of perpetrators of sexual violence against women. A comparison of incarcerated and community men showed that perpetrators of sexual violence against women reported significantly higher levels of ambivalent sexism, moral disengagement, and psychopathy than community men. The moderated mediational model showed that the dark triad was not directly associated with ambivalent sexism, but the relationship was fully mediated by moral disengagement mechanisms. Moreover, the interdependence of the variables evaluated was moderated by group. The moral disengagement mechanisms that explain both hostile and benevolent sexism were associated with Machiavellianism and psychopathy among perpetrators of sexual violence against women, whereas among community men, these mechanisms were associated with Machiavellianism and narcissism. These findings are discussed as they pertain to the treatment of perpetrators of sexual violence against women.

Keywords

ambivalent sexism dark triad moral disengagement sexual violence against women incarcerated adults

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Viki

G. T.

Masser

Bohner

(2003). Perceptions of a stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Anderson

C. A.

Bushman

B. J.

(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27–51. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231

Anderson

Cheers

(2018). Does the dark triad predict prejudice?: The role of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism in explaining negativity toward asylum seekers. Australian Psychologist, 53(3), 271–281. DOI: 10.1111/ap.12283

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 39–55. DOI: 10.1037/a0018362

Azizli

Atkinson

B. E.

Baughman

H. M.

Chin

Vernon

P. A.

Harris

Veselka

(2016). Lies and crimes: Dark Triad, misconduct, and high-stakes deception. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 34–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.034ç

Bandura

(1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In Reich

(Ed.), Origins ofterrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind (pp. 161-191). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bandura

(1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27-46.

Bandura

(1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

10.

Bandura

(1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.

11.

Bandura

(2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101-119.

12.

Bandura

Barbaranelli

Caprara

G. V.

Pastorelli

(1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364

13.

Begany

J. J.

Milburn

M. A.

(2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126. DOI: 10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119

14.

Best

Day

Campbell

Flynn

P. M.

Simpson

D. D.

(2009). Relationship between drug treatment engagement and criminal thinking style among drug-using offenders. European Addiction Research, 15(2), 71–77. DOI: 10.1159/000189785

15.

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

Stevens

M. R.

(2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf

16.

Bosch-Fiol

Ferrer-Perez

V. A.

(2019). The Pyramid model: A feminist alternative for analysing violence against women. Revista Estudos Feministas, 27(2), 1–14. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n254189

17.

Bosson

J. K.

Pinel

E. C.

Vandello

J. A.

(2010). The emotional impact of ambivalent sexism: Forecasts versus real experiences. Sex Roles, 62(7), 520–531. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9664-y

18.

Brewer

Lyons

Perry

O’Brien

(2019). Dark triad traits and perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519827666

19.

Çalıkoglu

E. O.

Aras

Hamza

Aydin

Nacakgedigi

Koga

P. M.

(2018). Sexism, attitudes, and behaviors towards violence against women in medical emergency services workers in Erzurum, Turkey. Global Health Action, 11(1), 1524–1541. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1524541

20.

Canto

J. M.

Vallejo-Martín

Perles

San Martín

(2020). The influence of ideological variables in the denial of violence against women: The role of sexism and social dominance orientation in the Spanish context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4934–4957. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144934

21.

DeLisi

Peters

D. J.

Dansby

Vaughn

M. G.

Shook

J. J.

Hochstetler

(2014). Dynamics of psychopathy and moral disengagement in the etiology of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(4), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204013506919

22.

Chandler

Shapiro

(2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 53-81.

23.

Cohen

(1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

24.

De Lemus

Castillo

Moya

Padilla

J. L.

Ryan

(2008). Elaboración y validación del Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente para Adolescentes [Elaboration and validation of Ambivalent Sexism Inventory for Adolescents]. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 8(2), 537-562.

25.

de Zavala

A. G.

Bierwiaczonek

(2020). Male, national, and religious collective narcissism predict sexism. Sex Roles, 1, 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/S11199-020-01193-3

26.

Díaz-Aguado

M. J.

Martínez-Arias

(2001). La construcción de la igualdad y la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer desde la educación secundaria [The construction of equality and the prevention of violence against women from secondary education]. Ministry of Work and Social affairs and Women Institute of Spain.

27.

Elliott

M. R.

Sammel

M. D.

Faul

(2012). Associations between variability of risk factors and health outcomes in longitudinal studies. Statistics in Medicine, 31(23), 2745–2756. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.5370

28.

Ellsberg

Arango

D. J.

Morton

Gennari

Kiplesund

Contreras

Watts

(2015). Prevention of violence against women and girls: What does the evidence say? Lancet, 385(9977), 1555–1566. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61703-7

29.

Expósito

Moya

M. C.

Glick

(1998). Sexismo ambivalente: medición y correlatos [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159–169. DOI: 10.1174/021347498760350641

30.

Farrington

D. P.

(1992). Criminal career research in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 521–536. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048255

31.

Ferrer-Pérez

V. A.

Bosch-Fiol

Blahopoulou

(2017). Cognitive distortions on interpersonal violence against women intervention programms applied in Spain. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 1(43), 135–147. DOI: 10.21865/RIDEP43_1

32.

Férriz

Navas

M. P.

Gómez-Fraguela

J. A.

Sobral

(2019). Moral disengagement and serious juvenile crime: A meta-analysis about its relationship. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(3), 162–170. DOI: 10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.3

33.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

34.

Gluck

Heesacker

Choi

H. D.

(2020). How much of the dark triad is accounted for by sexism? Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109728. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109728

35.

Grubbs

J. B.

Exline

J. J.

Twenge

J. M.

(2014). Psychological entitlement and ambivalent sexism: Understanding the role of entitlement in predicting two forms of sexism. Sex Roles, 70, 209–220. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11199-014-0360-1

36.

Guerrero-Molina

Moreno-Manso

J. M.

Guerrero-Barona

García-Baamonde Sánchez

M. E.

(2020). Perpetrators convicted of repeat and non-repeat offenders: Cognitive and social dimensions. Behavioral Psychology, 28(2), 331–345.

37.

Gutiérrez

Sanz

Espinosa

Gesteira

García-Vera

M. P.

(2016). The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale: Norms for the Spanish general population and development of a short version. Anales de Psicología, 32(1), 206–217. DOI: 10.6018/analesps.32.1.185471

38.

Hayes

A. F.

(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.

39.

Hellmer

Stenson

J. T.

Jylhä

K. M.

(2018). What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: Revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 29–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.025.

40.

Hill

Marshall

T. C.

(2018). Beliefs about sexual assault in India and Britain are explained by attitudes toward women and hostile sexism. Sex Roles, 79(7), 421–430. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-017-0880-6

41.

Hopkins-Doyle

Sutton

R. M.

Douglas

K. M.

Calogero

R. M.

(2019). Flattering to deceive: Why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 167–192. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspa0000135

42.

Jonason

P. K.

Lyons

Baughman

H. M.

Vernon

P. A.

(2014). What a tangled web we weave: The Dark Triad traits and deception. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 117–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.038

43.

Jonason

P. K.

Webster

G. D.

(2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0019265

44.

Jonason

P. K.

Webster

G. D.

Schmitt

D. P.

N. P.

Crysel

(2012). The antihero in popular culture: Life history theory and the dark triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 192–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027914

45.

Jones

D. N.

Neria

A. L.

(2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021

46.

Juarros-Basterretxea

Overall

Herrero

Rodríguez-Díaz

F. J.

(2019). Considering the effect of sexism on psychological intimate partner violence: A study with imprisoned men. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 11, 61–69. DOI: 10.5093/ejpalc2019a1

47.

Katsiyannis

Whitford

D. K.

Zhang

Gage

N. A.

(2018). Adult recidivism in United States: A meta-analysis 1994–2015. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(3), 686–696. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10826-017-0945-8

48.

Kokkinos

C. M.

Voulgaridou

Markos

(2016). Personality and relational aggression: Moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028

49.

Kraemer

H. C.

Kiernan

Essex

Kupfer

D. J.

(2008). How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 27, 101–108. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S101.

50.

Leaper

Gutierrez

B. C.

Farkas

(2020). Ambivalent sexism and reported relationship qualities in emerging adult heterosexual dating couples. Emerging Adulthood, 21, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696820934687

51.

Leidner

Castano

(2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82-91. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.846.

52.

Loinaz

(2014). Cognitive distortions in partner aggressors: Analysis of an evaluation tool. Terapia Psicológica, 32(1), 5–17. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-48082014000100001

53.

Lynch

K. R.

Renzetti

C. M.

(2020). Alcohol use, hostile sexism, and religious self-regulation: Investigating risk and protective factors of IPV perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17–18), 3237–3263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517708758

54.

Lyons

Houghton

Brewer

O’Brien

(2020). The dark triad and sexual assertiveness predict sexual coercion differently in men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520922346

55.

Maneiro

López-Romero

Gómez-Fraguela

J. A.

Cutrín

Romero

(2019). Pursuing the Dark Triad. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Dirty Dozen. Journal of Individual Differences, 40, 36–44. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000274

56.

Mann

R. E.

Hanson

R. K.

Thornton

(2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039

57.

Masser

Viki

G. T.

Power

(2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54(7–8), 565–574. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-006-9022-2

58.

Matosic

Ntoumanis

Boardley

I. D.

Sedikides

(2018). Narcissism, beliefs about controlling interpersonal style, and moral disengagement in sport coaches. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/1612197X.2018.1549580

59.

Maxwell

Cole

(2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.. Psychological methods, 12(1), 23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.23.

60.

Methot-Jones

Book

Gauthier

N. Y.

(2019). Less than human: Psychopathy, dehumanization, and sexist and violent attitudes towards women. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 250–260. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.002

61.

Miiler

J. D.

Vize

Crowe

M. L.

Lynam

D. R.

(2019). A critical appraisal of the dark-triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 353-360.

62.

Moore

Detert

J. R.

Treviño

K. L.

Baker

V. L.

Mayer

D. M.

(2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x

63.

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000111

64.

Navas

M. P.

Férriz

Maneiro

Cutrín

Gómez-Fraguela

J. A.

Sobral

(2020a). Cognitions on the dark side: Moral disengagement, dark triad and antisocial behavior in adolescents. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 52, 131–143. DOI: 10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.13

65.

Navas

M. P.

Maneiro

Cutrín

Gómez-Fraguela

J. A.

Sobral

(2020b). Associations between Dark Triad and ambivalent sexism: Sex differences among adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7754–7765. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217754

66.

Navas

M. P.

Maneiro

Cutrín

Gómez-Fraguela

J. A.

Sobral

(2021). Contributions of the dark triad to moral disengagement among incarcerated and community adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(2), 196–214. DOI: 10.1111/LCRP.12190

67.

Obermann

M.-L.

(2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 133–144. http://dx.doi:10.1002/ab.20378

68.

Ó Ciardha

(2011). A theoretical framework for understanding deviant sexual interest and cognitive distortions as overlapping constructs contributing to sexual offending against children. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 493–502. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.05.001

69.

Ó Ciardha

Ward

(2013). Theories of cognitive distortions in sexual offending: What the current research tells us. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012467856

70.

O’Connell

Marcus

D. K.

(2016). Psychopathic personality traits predict positive attitudes toward sexually predatory behaviors in college men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 372–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.011

71.

Paulhus

D. L.

Williams

K. M.

(2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

72.

Petruccelli

Simonelli

Barbaranelli

Grilli

Tripodi

M. F.

D’Urso

(2017). Moral disengagement strategies in sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), 470–480. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1252291

73.

Pina

Holland

James

(2017). The malevolent side of revenge porn proclivity: Dark personality traits and sexist ideology. International Journal of Technoethics, 8(1), 30–43. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.4018/IJT.2017010103

74.

Rodríguez-Castro

Lameiras-Fernández

Carrera-Fernández

M.-V.

Vallejo-Medina

(2013). The reliability and validity of the Myths Scale toward Love: Adolescents’ beliefs. International Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 157–168. DOI: 10.1174/021347413806196708

75.

Rollero

De Piccoli

(2020). Myths about intimate partner violence and moral disengagement: An analysis of sociocultural dimensions sustaining violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8139–8150. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218139

76.

Rosenberg

M. J.

Hovland

C. I.

McGuire

W. J.

Abelson

R. P.

Brehm

J. W.

(1960). Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components. (Yales studies in attitude and communication). Yale University Press.

77.

Rubio-Garay

Amor

P. J.

Carrasco

M. A.

(2017). Dimensionality and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS-S). Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 22, 43–54.

78.

Russell

B. L.

Trigg

K. Y.

(2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7), 565–573. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd

79.

Sanchez-Ruiz

M.-J.

El Ahmad

Karam

Saliba

M. A.

(2021). Rape myth acceptance in Lebanon: The role of sexual assault experience/familiarity, sexism, honor beliefs, and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110403–110409. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110403

80.

Schafer

J. L.

(1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.

81.

Sijtsema

J. J.

Garofalo

Jansen

Klimstra

T. A.

(2019). Disengaging from evil: Longitudinal associations between the dark triad, moral disengagement, and antisocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(8), 1351–1365. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10802-019-00519-4

82.

Somma

Borroni

Sellbom

Markon

K. E.

Krueger

R. F.

Fossati

(2020). Assessing dark triad dimensions from the perspective of moral disengagement and DSM–5 alternative model of personality disorder traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(2), 100–107. DOI: 10.1037/per0000388

83.

Strickland

S. M.

(2008). Female sex offenders: Exploring issues of personality, trauma, and cognitive distortions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(4), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507312944

84.

Suresh

K. P.

Chandrashekara

(2012). Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 5, 7–13. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.97779

85.

Tharp

A. T.

DeGue

Valle

L. A.

Brookmeyer

K. A.

Massetti

G. M.

Matjasko

J. L.

(2013). A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012470031

86.

Ubieto Oliván

(2018). La violencia sexual como violencia de género: una perspectiva desde el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos [Sexual violence as gender-based violence: An international human rights law perspective]. Femeris: Revista Multidisciplinar de Estudios de Género, 3(2), 165–170.

87.

Valor-Segura

Expósito

Moya

(2008). Attribution of aggressor’s behavior and advice to the victim in a case of domestic violence. Revista de Psicologia Social, 23(2), 171–180. DOI: 10.1174/021347408784135896

88.

Vernon

P. A.

Villani

V. C.

Vickers

L. C.

Harris

J. A.

(2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(2), 445–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007

89.

Viki

G. T.

Abrams

Masser

(2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28(3), 295–303. DOI: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000029140.72880.69

90.

White-Ajmani

M. L.

Bursik

(2014). Situational context moderates the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Psychology of Violence, 4(1), 90–100. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0031728

91.

Wood

Moir

James

(2009). Prisoners’ gang-related activity: The importance of bullying and moral disengagement. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(6), 569–581. DOI: 10.1080/10683160802427786

92.

Zeigler-Hill

V. E.

Marcus

D. K.

(2016). The dark side of personality: Science and practice in social, personality, and clinical psychology (pp. 371–389). American Psychological Association.