We examined the extent to which evaluative attitudes toward sexual aggression are distinct from other cognitions regarding sexually aggressive behavior. Evaluative attitudes toward sexual aggression refer to the extent to which sexual aggression is viewed negatively or positively. In a secondary analysis of online survey data from 495 community men, exploratory factor analysis revealed that items from a measure of evaluative attitudes formed a distinct factor from items designed to measure cognitive distortions regarding rape. These findings suggest that evaluative attitudes may be distinct from cognitive distortions. Furthermore, hierarchical regression analyses indicated that evaluative attitudes explained unique variance in self-reported past sexual aggression, proclivity for sexually aggressive behavior, and likelihood to rape. If future research finds support for a causal relationship between evaluative attitudes and sexual aggression, well-established evaluative-attitude-change procedures from the social psychological literature could be adapted to address evaluative attitudes toward sexual aggression in interventions aimed at reducing sexually aggressive behavior.
AbbeyA.ParkhillM. R.KossM. P. (2005). The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00236.x
AstiviaO. L. O.ZumboB. D. (2019). Heteroskedasticity in multiple regression analysis: What it is, how to detect it and how to solve it with applications in R and SPSS. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7275/q5xr-fr95
5.
AutyK. M.FarringtonD. P.CoidJ. W. (2015). The validity of self-reported convictions in a community sample: Findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. European Journal of Criminology, 12(5), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815578198
6.
BanjanovicE. S.OsborneJ. W. (2016). Confidence intervals for effect sizes: Applying bootstrap resampling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7275/dz3r-8n08
7.
BumbyK. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE Scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258015
8.
CudeckR.O’DellL. L. (1994). Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.475
9.
DavisK. C.GilmoreA. K.StappenbeckC. A.BalsanM. J.GeorgeW. H.NorrisJ. (2014). How to score the sexual experiences survey? A comparison of nine methods. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037494
10.
DrieschnerK.LangeA. (1999). A review of cognitive factors in the etiology of rape: Theories, empirical studies, and implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00016-6
FlachaireE. (2005). Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: Wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 49(2), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.05.018
13.
GawronskiB.StrackF. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.005
14.
GlasmanL. R.AlbarracínD. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
15.
HallG. C. N.HirschmanR. (1994). The relationship between men’s sexual aggression inside and outside the laboratory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.375
16.
HallG. C. N.HirschmanR.OliverL. (1994). Ignoring a woman’s dislike of sexual material: Sexually impositional behavior in the laboratory. The Journal of Sex Research, 31(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499409551725
17.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012462244
18.
HermannC. A. (2015). Evaluations of rape: Investigations using implicit and explicit measures, online research methodology, and samples of community men [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carleton University.
19.
HermannC. A.BabchishinK. M.NunesK. L.Leth-SteensenC.CortoniF. (2012). Factor structure of the Bumby RAPE Scale: A two-factor model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(7), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812436802
20.
HermannC. A.NunesK. L. (2018). Implicit and explicit evaluations of sexual aggression predict subsequent sexually aggressive behavior in a sample of community men. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216682952
21.
HermannC. A.NunesK. L.MaimoneS. (2018). Examining implicit and explicit evaluations of sexual aggression and sexually aggressive behavior in men recruited online. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216681560
22.
HermannC. A.NunesK. L.PhamA. T. (2020). Construct validity of self-reported likelihood to sexually aggress: Does it predict subsequent sexually aggressive behavior? [Manuscript submitted for publication].
23.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
24.
IBM SPSS statistics 25 command syntax reference. (2017). IBM Corporation.
25.
JolliffeD.FarringtonD. P.HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F.HillK. G.KostermanR. (2003). Predictive, concurrent, prospective and retrospective validity of self-reported delinquency. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 13(3), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.541
26.
KrausS. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007
MarunaS.CopesH. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research?Crime and Justice, 32, 221–320.
29.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X114608
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). MPlus user’s guide.
31.
NunesK. L.HermannC. A.MaimoneS.WoodsM. (2015). Thinking clearly about violent cognitions: Attitudes may be distinct from other cognitions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(8), 1322–1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514540329
32.
NunesK. L.HermannC. A.RatcliffeK. (2013). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward rape are associated with sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(13), 2657–2675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513487995
33.
NunesK. L.HermannC. A.WhiteK.PettersenC.BumbyK. (2018). Attitude may be everything, but is everything an attitude? Cognitive distortions may not be evaluations of rape. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215625489
34.
NunesK. L.PedneaultC. I.HermannC. A. (2020). The Evaluation of Violence Questionnaire (EVQ): Development and validity of a self-report measure of evaluative attitudes toward violence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
NunesK. L.PettersenC.HermannC. A.LoomanJ.SpapeJ. (2016). Does change on the MOLEST and RAPE Scales predict sexual recidivism?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(5), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214540725
36.
Ó CiardhaC.WardT. (2013). Theories of cognitive distortions in sexual offending: What the current research tells us. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012467856
37.
O’ConnorB. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
38.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
39.
PedneaultC.NunesK. L.HermannC. A. (2018, July). Validating. . .and then revising. . . an evaluation of sexual aggression scale. In NunesK. L. (Chair), Violent attitudes and beliefs: Conceptualization, measurement, and relationship with violent behaviour. Symposium conducted at the 23rd World Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression, Paris, France.
40.
PedneaultC.NunesK. LHermannC. AWhiteK. (2020). Evaluative attitudes may explain the link between injunctive norms and sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520926306
41.
PhamA. T.NunesK. L.MaimoneS.HermannC. A. (2020). How accurately can researchers measure criminal history, sexual deviance, and risk of sexual recidivism from self-report information alone?Journal of Sexual Aggression. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2020.1741709
42.
PiqueroA. R.SchubertC. A.BrameR. (2014). Comparing official and self-report records of offending across gender and race/ethnicity in a longitudinal study of serious youthful offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(4), 526–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427813520445
43.
Qualtrics. (2014). Panel Book 2014. Qualtrics Labs.
44.
SchmittT. A.SassD. A. (2011). Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410387348
45.
StiffJ.MongeauP. (2016). Persuasive communication (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
46.
SzumskiF.BartelsR. M.BeechA. R.FisherD. (2018). Distorted cognition related to male sexual offending: The multi-mechanism theory of cognitive distortions (MMT-CD). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.001
47.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In DuffeeD.CrutchfieldR. D.MastrofskiS.MazerolleL.McDowallD.OstromB. (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000: Innovations in measurement and analysis. National Institute of Justice.
48.
WardT.GannonT. A.KeownK. (2006). Beliefs, values, and action: The judgment model of cognitive distortions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.10.003
49.
WeinrottM. R.SaylorM. (1991). Self-report of crimes committed by sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626091006003002
50.
WidmanL.OlsonM. A.BolenR. M. (2013). Self-reported sexual assault in convicted sex offenders and community men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1519–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468237
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
