Sexual Offending Pathways and Chat Conversations in an Online Environment

Abstract

People from all over the world pay for live streaming video images of minors, also called webcam child sex tourism (WCST). Although there is an increase in research about online sexual offending, relatively few studies have investigated the approaches used by people who have committed WCST offenses (PWCST). In addition, these studies describe these approaches as active-orientated without mentioning an avoidant pathway. The aim of the study was to investigate whether PWCST use similar pathways as the four offending pathways identified by Ward and Hudson. Using qualitative thematic analysis, 195 cases of online chat conversations between PWCST and operators posing as a minor were analyzed. The Ward and Hudson pathways model was partially replicable. Evidence was found for an approach and avoidant pathway. The data also suggest three other sub-pathways and a mixed pathway. Most PWCST in this study used an approach pathway to immediately approach minors for sex, which provides important insight into the diverse nature of sexual grooming.

Keywords

PWCST webcam child sex tourism online grooming offending pathways internet

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aslan

(2011). Critically evaluating typologies of internet sex offenders: A psychological perspective. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11, 406–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2011.588925

Babchishin

K. M.

Hanson

R. K.

Hermann

C. A.

(2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 23, 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370708

Balfe

Gallagher

Masson

Balfe

Brugha

Hackett

(2015). Internet child sex offenders’ concerns about online security and their use of identity protection technologies: A review. Child Abuse Review, 24, 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2308

Beech

A. R.

Elliott

I. A.

Birgden

Findlater

(2008). The Internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.03.007

Bennell

Alison

L. J.

Stein

K. L.

Alison

E. K.

Canter

D. V.

(2001). Sexual offenses against children as the abusive exploitation of conventional adult-child relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182001

Bergen

Davidson

Schulz

Schuhmann

Johansson

Santtila

Jern

(2014). The effects of using identity deception and suggesting secrecy on the outcomes of adult-adult and adult-child or -adolescent online sexual interactions. Victims & Offenders, 9, 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2013.873750

Bickley

J. A.

Beech

A. R.

(2002). An investigation of the Ward and Hudson pathways model of the sexual offense process with child abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260502017004002

Black

P. J.

Wollis

Woodworth

Hancock

J. T.

(2015). A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world. Child Abuse & Neglect, 44, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004

Bogaerts

Vervaeke

Goethals

(2004). A comparison of relational attitude and personality disorders in the explanation of child molestation. Sexual Abuse, 16, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600103

10.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

11.

Briggs

Simon

W. T.

Simonsen

(2011). An exploratory study of internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: Has the internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sexual Abuse, 23, 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384275

12.

Buschman

Bogaerts

Foulger

Wilcox

Sosnowski

Cushman

(2010). Sexual history disclosure polygraph examinations with cybercrime offences: A first Dutch explorative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09334942

13.

Child sexual exploitation: Definition and practitioner briefing paper. (2016, October 25). https://www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/10/8235/1

14.

Collingridge

D. S.

Gantt

E. E.

(2008). The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality, 23, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860608320646

15.

Craven

Brown

Gilchrist

(2006). Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600601069414

16.

DeHart

Dwyer

Seto

M. C.

Moran

Letourneau

Schwarz-Watts

(2016). Internet sexual solicitation of children: A proposed typology of offenders based on their chats, e-mails, and social network posts. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1241309

17.

De Santisteban

Del Hoyo

Alcázar-Córcoles

M. A.

Gámez-Guadix

. (2018). Progression, maintenance, and feedback of online child sexual grooming: A qualitative analysis of online predators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 80, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.026

18.

Finkelhor

(1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. Free Press.

19.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Marconi

V. C.

(2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27, 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

20.

Houtepen

J. A. B. M.

Sijtsema

J. J.

Bogaerts

(2014). From child pornography offending to child sexual abuse: A review of child pornography offender characteristics and risks for cross-over. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.011

21.

Kleijn

Bogaerts

(2019). Sexual-orientated online chat conversations: Characteristics and testing pathways of online perpetrators. In van der Hof

Georgieva

Schermer

Koops

B.-J.

(Eds.), Sweetie 2.0: Using artificial intelligence to fight webcam child sex tourism (pp. 95–112). T.M.C. Asser Press.

22.

Kloess

J. A.

Hamilton-Giachritsis

C. E.

Beech

A. R.

(2019). Offense processes of online sexual grooming and abuse of children via internet communication platforms. Sexual Abuse, 31, 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217720927

23.

Kloess

J. A.

Seymour-Smith

Hamilton-Giachritsis

C. E.

Long

M. L.

Shipley

Beech

A. R.

(2017). A qualitative analysis of offenders’ modus operandi in sexually exploitative interactions with children online. Sexual Abuse, 29, 563–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215612442

24.

Kloess

J. A.

Woodhams

Whittle

H. C.

Grant

Hamilton-Giachritsis

C. E.

(2019). The challenges of identifying and classifying child sexual abuse material. Sexual Abuse, 31, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724768

25.

Krone

(2004). A typology of online child pornography offending [Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice]. https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi279

26.

Langdon

P. E.

Maxted

Murphy

G. H.

(2007). An exploratory evaluation of the Ward and Hudson offending pathways model with sex offenders who have intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701364686

27.

Lanning

K. V.

(2010). Child molesters: A behavioral anaylsis for professionals investigating the sexual exploitation of children. https://www.icmec.org/child-molesters-a-behavioral-analysis-for-professionals-investigating-the-sexual-exploitation-of-children/

28.

Lindsay

W. R.

Steptoe

Beech

A. T.

(2008). The Ward and Hudson pathways model of the sexual offense process applied to offenders with intellectual disability. Sexual Abuse, 20, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208323369

29.

Malesky

L. A.

(2007). Predatory online behavior: Modus operandi of convicted sex offenders in identifying potential victims and contacting minors over the internet. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v16n02_02

30.

Marcum

C. D.

(2007). Interpreting the intentions of internet predators: An examination of online predatory behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v16n04_06

31.

McHugh

M. L.

(2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22, 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031

32.

McKenna

K. Y. A.

Green

A. S.

Gleason

M. E. J.

(2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246

33.

Merdian

H. L.

Curtis

Thakker

Wilson

Boer

D. P.

(2013). The three dimensions of online child pornography offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.611898

34.

O’Connell

(2003). A typology of cybersexploitation and online grooming practices. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Society/documents/2003/07/17/Groomingreport.pdf

35.

Saunders

Sim

Kingstone

Baker

Waterfield

Bartlam

Burroughs

Jinks

(2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

36.

Schermer

B. W.

Georgieva

Van der Hof

Koops

B.-J.

(2016). Legal aspects of Sweetie 2.0. TILT.

37.

Surjadi

Bullens

Van Horn

Bogaerts

(2010). Internet offending: Sexual and non-sexual functions within a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903470054

38.

Tener

Wolak

Finkelhor

(2015). A typology of offenders who use online communications to commit sex crimes against minors. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1009602

39.

Ward

Hudson

S. M.

(1998). A model of the relapse process in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626098013006003

40.

Webb

Craissati

Keen

(2007). Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse, 19, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9063-2

41.

Webster

Davidson

Bifulco

Gottschalk

Caretti

Pham

T. H.

Grove-Hills

Turley

Tompkins

C. N. E.

Ciulla

Milazzo

Schimmenti

Craparo

(2012). European online grooming project: Final report. European Online Grooming Project. https://www.academia.edu/23987615/European_Online_Grooming_Project_-_Final_Report

42.

Webster

S. D.

(2005). Pathways to sexual offense recidivism following treatment: An examination of the Ward and Hudson self-regulation model of relapse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1175–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278532

43.

Whittle

H. C.

Hamilton-Giachritsis

C. E.

Beech

Collings

(2013). A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.003

44.

Williams

Elliott

I. A.

Beech

A. R.

(2013). Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 34, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707550

45.

Winters

G. M.

Kaylor

L. E.

Jeglic

E. L.

(2017). Sexual offenders contacting children online: An examination of transcripts of sexual grooming. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1271146

46.

Wolak

Finkelhor

Mitchell

K. J.

(2004). Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: Implications for prevention based on findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.05.006

47.

Wolak

Finkelhor

Mitchell

K. J.

(2009). Trends in arrests of “online predators.” Crimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire. https://scholars.unh.edu/ccrc/52/

48.

Wolak

Finkelhor

Mitchell

K. J.

Ybarra

M. L.

(2008). Online “predators” and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 63, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.111

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB