Recent legislative developments have led to a marked increase in the empirical investigation of motivations and judgments of so-called acts of “revenge pornography” offending. In two independently sampled studies, we used moderation analyses to investigate whether higher levels of intrasexual competition predicted more lenient judgments of revenge pornography offenses as a function of sex (Study 1, N = 241), and whether such relationships would be further moderated by physical attractiveness (Study 2, N = 402). Potential covariates of callous-unemotional traits, empathy, and victimization history were controlled for. Opposing our hypotheses, we consistently observed a trend for higher levels of intrasexual competition being associated with more lenient judgments of revenge pornography offenses involving male victims by female participants. The results are discussed in terms of intrasexual competition potentially sharing variance with unobserved constructs in the wider sexological literature, and of the key relevance of these findings for future empirical investigation into judgments of nonconsensual image–based offending.
ArnockyS.VaillancourtT. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In FisherM. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 25–39). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.3
2.
BaguleyT. (2012). Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BatesS. (2017). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565
4.
BlakeK. R.BastianB.DensonT. F.GrosjeanP.BrooksR. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualisation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115
5.
BloomS. (2014). No vengeance for revenge porn victims: Unravelling why this latest female-centric, intimate-partner offense is still legal, and why we should criminalize it. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 42, 233–289.
6.
BothamleyS.TullyR. J. (2018). Understanding revenge pornography: Public perceptions of revenge pornography and victim blaming. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2016-0253
7.
BrewerG.HuntD.JamesG.AbellL. (2015). Dark triad traits, infidelity and romantic revenge. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.007
8.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.
9.
BullockC. M.BecksonM. (2011). Male victims of sexual assault: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 197–205.
CitronD. K.FranksM. A. (2014). Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 345–391.
16.
ClancyE. M.KlettkeB.HalfordD. J. (2019). The dark side of sexting—Factors predicting the dissemination of sexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.023
17.
CrossC. P. (2010). Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality: The role of risky impulsivity. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 4779–4792. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800418
18.
DarwinC. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray.
19.
DaviesS. E. (2017). “It’s her fault for sending them in the first place” vs “Blame would definitely be with the person who released them”: A study to explore whether the opinions of males and females differ in regards to revenge porn, and if the level of male hypermasculinity has any effect [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cardiff Metropolitan University.
20.
DavisA. C.DufortC.DesrochersJ.VaillancourtT.ArnockyS. (2018). Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: Sex differences in gossip frequency, content, and attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0124-6
21.
DawkinsJ. T. (2015). A dish served cold: The case for criminalizing revenge pornography. Cumberland Law Review, 45, 395–447.
22.
DecetyJ.LammC. (2009). Empathy versus personal distress—Recent evidence from social neuroscience. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 199–213). The MIT Press.
23.
DoaneA. N.PearsonM. R.KellyM. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.051
24.
FayM. (2018). The naked truth: Insufficient coverage for revenge porn victims at State law and the proposed Federal legislation to adequately redress them. Boston College Law Review, 59, 1839–1871.
FrickP. J. (2004). Inventory of callous-unemotional traits [Unpublished rating scale]. University of New Orleans.
29.
GarciaJ. R.GesselmanA. N.SilimanS. A.PerryB. L.CoeK.FisherH. E. (2016). Sexting among singles in the USA: Prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images. Sexual Health, 13, 428–435.
30.
GiammarcoE. A.VernonP. A. (2014). Vengeance and the dark triad: The role of empathy and perspective taking in trait forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.010
31.
GoodboyA. K.MartinM. M. (2015). The personality profile of a cyberbully: Examining the dark triad. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.052
32.
HadwinJ. (2017). Victim blaming and third-person effect: A comparative analysis of attitudes for revenge porn and sexual assault [Unpublished Master’s dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.
33.
HarrisM.DunnM.AlwynT. (2019). Intrasexual competition as a potential influence on anabolic-androgenic steroid use initiation. Journal of Health Psychology, 24, 1210–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317692145
34.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
35.
HenryN.PowellA. (2014). Preventing sexual violence: Interdisciplinary approaches to overcoming a rape culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
HenryN.PowellA. (2016). Sexual violence in the digital age: The scope and limits of criminal law. Social & Legal Studies, 25, 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915624273
37.
HoR.ForsterLeeL.ForsterLeeR.CroftsN. (2002). Justice versus vengeance: Motives underlying punitive judgements. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00161-1
38.
HodsollS.LavieN.VidingE. (2014). Emotional attentional capture in children with conduct problems: The role of callous-unemotional traits. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00570
KimonisE. R.BranchJ.HagmanB.GrahamN.MillerC. (2013). The psychometric properties of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in an undergraduate sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029024
41.
KnapenJ. E. P.BlakerN. M.van VugtM. (2018). The Napoleon Complex: When shorter men take more. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1134–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618772822
42.
LagesonS. E.McElrathS.PalmerK. E. (2018). Gendered public support for criminalizing “revenge porn.”Feminist Criminology, 14, 560–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085118773398
43.
LalumièreM. L.HarrisG. T.QuinseyV. L.RiceM. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. American Psychological Association.
44.
MarchE.GrieveR.MarringtonJ.JonasonP. K. (2017). Trolling on tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.025
45.
MassarK.BuunkA. P.RemptS. (2012). Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.013
46.
McAndrewF. T. (2017). How “the gossip” became a woman and how “gossip” became her weapon of choice. In FisherM. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 191–208). Oxford University Press.
47.
McCaulK. D.VeltumL. G.BoyechkoV.CrawfordJ. J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, and foreseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00375.x
48.
McGlynnC.RackleyE.HoughtonR. (2017). Beyond “revenge porn”: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 25, 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2
49.
MuggletonN. K.TarranS. R.FincherC. L. (2018). Who punishes promiscuous women? Both women and men are prejudiced towards sexually-accessible women, but only women inflict costly punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.12.003
50.
NiemiL.YoungL. (2016). When and why we see victims as responsible: The impact of ideology on attitudes towards victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653933
51.
Patella-ReyP. (2018). Beyond privacy: Bodily integrity as an alternative framework for understanding non-consensual pornography. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428653
52.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
RasmussenK. R.BoonS. D. (2014). Romantic revenge and the dark triad: A model of impellance and inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.018
55.
ReniersR. L. E. P.CorcoranR.DrakeR.ShryaneN. M.VöllmB. A. (2011). The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
56.
ReynoldsT.BaumeisterR. F.ManerJ. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.011
57.
RingroseJ.RenoldE. (2012). Slut-shaming, girl power and “sexualisation”: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.645023
SteffgenG.KönigA.PfetschJ.MelzerA. (2011). Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0445
61.
StroudS. R. (2014). The dark side of the online self: A pragmatist critique of the growing plague of revenge porn. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29, 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2014.917976
62.
ThomasA. G.Stewart-WilliamsS. (2018). Mating strategy flexibility in the laboratory: Preferences for long- and short-term mating change in response to evolutionary relevant variables. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.004
63.
ThornhillR.PalmerC. T. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. The MIT Press.
64.
VaillancourtT. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, Article 20130080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080
65.
VaillancourtT.SharmaA. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413
66.
WalkerK.SleathE. (2017). A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.010
67.
WardT.SiegertR. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208401823
68.
WesterlundM.SanttilaP.JohanssonA.VarjonenM.WittingK.JernP.SandnabbaK. N. (2010). Does unrestricted sociosexual behaviour have a shared genetic basis with sexual coercion?Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(1–2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802621925
69.
WrightM. F.HarperB. D.WachsS. (2018). The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: The moderating effect of online disinhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 140, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.001
70.
YostM. R.ZurbriggenE. L. (2006). Gender differences in the enactment of sociosexuality: An examination of implicit social motives, sexual fantasies, coercive sexual attitudes, and aggressive sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 43(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552311
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
