Understanding how individuals with sexual convictions experience prison and its environment is important because such experiences can affect rehabilitation outcomes. This is the first qualitative longitudinal investigation that explores the experiences of prisoners in a prison exclusively for individuals with sexual convictions over time. The purpose of this research was to explore the rehabilitative and therapeutic climate of a recently re-rolled prison (a general prison turned into a prison only for individuals who have sexually offended) at two time points (T1 at re-roll and T2 a year later). The study focuses on prisoners’ perspectives of the purpose of the prison, experience of prison life, relationships in the prison, and the prison regime over time. Twenty interviews were conducted across the time points and revealed two main superordinate themes: “‘Being’ in a prison for individuals with sexual convictions” and “obstructions to change.” This research adds to the emerging body of knowledge surrounding the importance of the wider prison environment on the rehabilitation of individuals with sexual convictions and on the benefits and risks of co-locating men who have committed sexual offenses in the same prison site. It also has implications wider than rehabilitation of those convicted of sexual offenses and has insights for the types of environment and prisoner–staff relationships that are conducive to rehabilitation.
AkermanG. (2010). Undertaking therapy at HMP Grendon with men who have committed sexual offenses. In ShukerR.SullivanE. (Eds.), Grendon and the emergence of forensic therapeutic communities: Developments in research and practice (pp. 171-182). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
BeechA. R.FordhamA. S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 219-237. doi:10.1177/107906329700900306
3.
BeechA. R.Hamilton-GiachritsisC. E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in group-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse, 17, 127-140.
4.
BeechA. R.OliverC.FisherD.BeckettR. (2005). STEP 4: The Sex Offender Treatment Programme in prison: Addressing the offending behaviour of rapists and sexual murderers. Prepared for Her Majesty’s Prison Service, London, England.
5.
BirgdenA. (2004). Therapeutic jurisprudence and responsivity: Finding the will and the way in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 283-295. doi:10.1080/10683160410001662771
6.
BlagdenN.PerrinC.SmithS.GleesonF.GilliesL. (2017). “A different world” exploring and understanding the climate of a recently re-rolled sexual offender prison. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23, 151-166. doi:10.1080/13552600.2016.1264633
7.
BlagdenN.WinderB.GregsonM.ThorneK. (2014). Making sense of denial in sexual offenders: A qualitative phenomenological and repertory grid analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1698-1731. doi:10.1177/0886260513511530
8.
BlagdenN.WinderB.HamesC. (2016). “They treat us like human beings”—Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison: Impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 371-396. doi:10.1177/0306624X14553227
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10.
CioffiD. (2003). Perception in the social token. In HeathertonT. F. (Ed.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 184-219). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
CrawleyE. M. (2004). Emotion and performance: Prison officers and the presentation of self in prisons. Punishment & Society, 6, 411-427. doi:10.1177/1462474504046121
CreweB. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 455-468. doi:10.1177/1477370811413805
14.
CreweB.WarrJ.BennettP.SmithA. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56-74.
15.
DayA.CaseyS.VessJ.HuisyG. (2012). Assessing the social climate of Australian prisons (Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 427). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
16.
DigardL. (2010). Sex offenders and their probation officers’ perceptions of community management in England and Wales (Master’s thesis). University of Cambridge, UK.
17.
DirkzwagerA. J.KruttschnittC. (2012). Prisoners’ perceptions of correctional officers’ behavior in English and Dutch prisons. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 404-412. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.004
18.
DrieschnerK. H.LammersS. M.van der StaakC. P. (2004). Treatment motivation: An attempt for clarification of an ambiguous concept. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1115-1137. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.003
19.
EriksonA.ParkM.ThamK. (2010). Belonging: A qualitative, longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during one year of rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 831-838. doi:10.2340/16501977-0608
20.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. London, England: Simon & Schuster.
21.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
22.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
23.
HardingR. (2014). Rehabilitation and prison social climate: Do “what works” rehabilitation programs work better in prisons that have a positive social climate?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 47, 163-175.
24.
HogueT. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology, 19, 27-32.
25.
HoldsworthE.BowenE.BrownS.HowatD. (2014). Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 102-121. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004
26.
IevinsA.CreweB. (2015). “Nobody’s better than you, nobody’s worse than you”: Moral community among prisoners convicted of sexual offenses. Punishment & Society, 17, 482-501. doi:10.1177/1462474515603803
27.
JensenE. L.KaneS. L. (2012). The effects of therapeutic community on recidivism up to four years after release from prison a multisite study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1075-1087. doi:10.1177/0093854812442331
KjelsbergE.LoosL. H. (2008). Conciliation or condemnation? Prison employees’ and young peoples’ attitudes towards sexual offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 95-103.
30.
KnightM. T. D.WykesT.HaywardP. (2003). “People don’t understand”: An investigation of stigma in schizophrenia using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Journal of Mental Health, 12, 209-222. doi:10.1080/0963823031000118203
31.
LeaS.AuburnT.KibblewhiteK. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 103-119. doi:10.1177/0306624X99431010
32.
LeBelT. P.BurnettR.MarunaS.BushwayS. (2008). The “chicken and egg” of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 131-159. doi:10.1177/1477370807087640
33.
LevensonJ. S.MacgowanM. J.MorinJ. W.CotterL. P. (2009). Perceptions of sex offenders about treatment: Satisfaction and engagement in group therapy. Sexual Abuse, 21, 35-56. doi:10.1177/1079063208326072
34.
LieblingA. (2011a). Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment & Society, 13, 530-550.
35.
LieblingA. (2011b). Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 484-499. doi:10.1177/1477370811413807
36.
LieblingA.PriceD.ElliottC. (1999). Appreciative inquiry and relationships in prison. Punishment & Society, 1, 71-98. doi:10.1177/14624749922227711
37.
LiptonD. S.PearsonF. S.ClelandC. M.YeeD. (2002). The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural treatment methods on offender recidivism: Meta-analytic outcomes from the CDATE project. In McGuireJ. (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programs and policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 79-112). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
38.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146.
39.
MannR. E.WebsterS. D.WakelingH. C.KeylockH. (2013). Why do sexual offenders refuse treatment?Journal of sexual aggression, 19(2), 191-206.
40.
MarshallP. (1997). A reconviction study of HMP Grendon therapeutic community (Vol. 53). London, England: Home Office.
41.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2010). Can treatment be effective with sexual offenders or does it do harm? A response to Hanson (2010) and Rice (2010). Sexual Offender Treatment, 5. Retrieved from www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/87.html
42.
MarunaS.LeBelT.NaplesM.MitchellN. (2009). Looking-glass identitytransformation: Pygmalion and Golem in the rehabilitation process. In VeyseyB.ChristianJ.MartinezD. J. (Eds.), How offenders transform their lives (pp. 30–55). Ottawa, ON: Willan.
43.
McCoyL. K. (2017). Longitudinal qualitative research and interpretative phenomenological analysis: Philosophical connections and practical considerations. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14, 442-458. doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1340530
44.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
45.
ParkinS.McKeganeyN. (2000). The rise and rise of peer education approaches. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7, 293-310. doi:10.1080/0968763005010996
46.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2008). Desistance and the feared self: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 99, 1103.
47.
PerrinC.BlagdenN. (2014). Accumulating meaning, purpose and opportunities to change ‘drip by drip’: the impact of being a listener in prison. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(9), 902-920.
48.
PhillipsL. A.LindsayM. (2011). Prison to society: A mixed methods analysis of coping with reentry. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 136-154. doi:10.1177/0306624X09350212
49.
PriestleyP. (1980). Community of scapegoats: The segregation of sex offenders and informers in prison. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
RicciardelliR. (2014). Coping strategies: Investigating how male prisoners manage the threat of victimization in federal prisons. The Prison Journal, 94, 411-434. doi:10.1177/0032885514548001
52.
RicciardelliR.MoirM. (2013). Stigmatized among the stigmatized: Sex offenders in Canadian penitentiaries. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55, 353-386. doi:10.3138/cjccj.2012.E22
53.
SchalastN.RediesM.CollinsM.StaceyJ.HowellsK. (2008). EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 49-58. doi:10.1002/cbm.677
54.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597-630.
55.
SchwaebeC. (2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 614-625. doi:10.1177/0306624X05275829
56.
SerranG.FernandezY.MarshallW. L.MannR. E. (2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 368-374. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.368
57.
SirdifieldC. (2006). Piloting a new role in mental health—Prison based health trainers. The Journal of Mental Health Workforce Development, 1, 15-22. doi:10.1108/17556228200600026
58.
SkrapecC. A. (2001). Phenomenology and serial murder: Asking different questions. Homicide Studies, 5, 46-63. doi:10.1177/1088767901005001004
59.
SmithJ. A.EatoughV. (2007). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In LyonsE.CoyleA. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
SmithP.CullenF. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta-analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 183-208. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00551.x
61.
SnowL. (2002). The role of formalised peer-group support in prisons. In TowlG.SnowL.McHughM. (Eds.), Suicide in prisons (pp. 102-120). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
62.
SpencerD. (2009). Sex offender as homo sacer. Punishment & Society, 11, 219-240. doi:10.1177/1462474508101493
63.
SpencerD.RicciardelliR. (2017). “They’re a very sick group of individuals”: Correctional officers, emotions, and sex offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 21, 380-394. doi:1362480616647590
64.
TateH.BlagdenN.MannR. (2017). Prisoners’ perceptions of care and rehabilitation from prison officers trained as 5 minute interventionists. London, England: Ministry of Justice.
65.
ThomsonR.HollandJ. (2003). Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 233-244. doi:10.1080/1364557032000091833
66.
UgelvikT. (2012). Prisoners and their victims: Techniques of neutralization, techniques of the self. Ethnography, 13, 259-277. doi:10.1080/1364557032000091833
67.
WardT.DayA.HowellsK.BirgdenA. (2004). The multifactor offender readiness model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 645-673. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.001
68.
WareJ.FrostA.HoyA. (2010). A review of the use of therapeutic communities with sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 721-742. doi:10.1177/0306624X09343169
69.
WareJ.MannR. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 279-288.
70.
WeaverB. (2015). Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. London: Routledge.
71.
WilligC. (2008). Introducing qualitative research methods in psychology. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.
72.
WoessnerG.SchwedlerA. (2014). Correctional treatment of sexual and violent offenders: Therapeutic change, prison climate, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 862-879. doi:10.1177/0093854813520544
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
