The Sexual Sadism Scale (SeSaS) was developed to assist in the diagnosis of sexual sadism, and it revealed adequate psychometric properties in prior research. This study cross validated the SeSaS in Switzerland using a sample of 179 male sex offenders. Specifically, the SeSaS conformed to a Mokken model of double monotonicity (scalability coefficient [H] = .46, coefficient of reproducibility [CR] = .89), indicating that it measures a unidimensional construct of sexual sadism with hierarchically ordered items. The reliability of the scale was acceptable to high (ρ = .80, λ2 = .75, κ = .88). In addition, the SeSaS was strongly associated with sexual sadism diagnoses based on mental health manuals (rpb = .60, odds ratio [OR] = 13.02, area under the curve [AUC] = 1) but not with recidivism. The results suggest that the use of the SeSaS may improve the validity and reliability of sexual sadism diagnoses, therefore playing a role in the assessment and management of sex offenders.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BernerW.BergerP.HillA. (2003). Sexual sadism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 383-395. doi:10.1177/0306624X03256131
4.
BradleyR.ShedlerJ.WestenD. (2006). Is the appendix a useful appendage? An empirical examination of depressive, passive-aggressive (negativistic), sadistic, and self-defeating personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20, 524-540. doi:10.1521/pedi.2006.20.5.524
5.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30, 676–704. doi:10.1177/1079063217691965.
6.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
7.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
8.
DeLisiM.DruryA.ElbertM.TahjaK.CaropresoD.HeinrichsT. (2017). Sexual sadism and criminal versatility: Does sexual sadism spillover into nonsexual crimes?Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 9, 2-12. doi:10.1108/JACPR-05-2016-0229
9.
DorenD.ElwoodR. (2009). The diagnostic reliability of sexual sadism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 251-261. doi:10.1177/1079063209342072
10.
EherR.SchillingF.HansmannB.PumbergerT.NitschkeJ.HabermeyerE.MokrosA. (2016). Sadism and violent reoffending in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28, 46-72. doi:10.1177/1079063214566715
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
12.
FedoraO.ReddonJ. R.MorrisonJ. W.FedoraS. K.PascoeH.YeudallL. T. (1992). Sadism and other paraphilias in normal controls and aggressive and nonaggressive sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 1-15. doi:10.1007/BF01542713
13.
FedoroffP. J. (2008). Sadism, sadomasochism, sex, and violence. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 637-646. doi:10.1007/BF01542713
14.
FleissJ. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 378-382. doi:10.1037/h0031619
15.
FrancesA.WollertR. (2012). Sexual sadism: Avoiding its misuse in sexually violent predator evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 40, 409-416.
16.
GuttmanL. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139-150. doi:10.2307/2086306
17.
GuttmanL. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282. doi:10.1007/BF02288892
18.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Solicitor General of Canada.
19.
HardouinJ.-B.Bonnaud-AntignacA.SébilleV. (2011). Nonparametric item response theory using Stata. Stata Journal, 11, 30-51.
20.
HareR. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
21.
HargreavesC.FrancisB. (2014). The long term recidivism risk of young sexual offenders in England and Wales: Enduring risk or redemption?Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 164-172. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.017
22.
HarrellF. E.Jr.CaliffR. M.PryorD. B.LeeK. L.RosatiR. A. (1982). Evaluating the yield of medical tests. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 247, 2543-2546. doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030
23.
KingstonD. A.SetoM. C.FirestoneP.BradfordJ. M. W. (2010). Comparing indicators of sexual sadism as predictors of recidivism among adult male sexual offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 574-584. doi:10.1037/a0019734
24.
LoevingerJ. (1948). The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507-529. doi:10.1037/h0055827
25.
LongpréN.GuayJ.-P.KnightR. A. (2017). MTC Sadism Scale: Toward a dimensional assessment of severe sexual sadism with behavioral markers. Assessment. doi:10.1177/1073191117737377
26.
LongpréN.ProulxJ.Brouillette-AlarieS. (2018). Convergent validity of three measures of sexual sadism: Value of a dimensional measure. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30, 192-208. doi:10.1177/1079063216649592
MarshallW. L.KennedyP. (2003). Sexual sadism in sexual offenders: An elusive diagnosis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 1-22. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00052-0
29.
MarshallW. L.KennedyP.YatesP. (2002). Issues concerning the reliability and validity of the diagnosis of sexual sadism applied in prison settings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 301-311. doi:10.1177/107906320201400402
30.
MarshallW. L.KennedyP.YatesP.SerranG. (2002). Diagnosing sexual sadism in sexual offenders: Reliability across diagnosticians. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 668-677. doi:10.1177/107906320201400402
31.
MarshallW. L.YatesP. (2004). Diagnostic issues in sexual sadism among sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 21-27. doi:10.1080/13552600410001470973
32.
MokkenR. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis: With applications in political research. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
33.
MokrosA.SchillingF.EherR.NitschkeJ. (2012). The Severe Sexual Sadism Scale: Cross-validation and scale properties. Psychological Assessment, 24, 764-769. doi:10.1037/a0026419
34.
MokrosA.SchillingF.WeissK.NitschkeJ.EherR. (2014). Sadism in sexual offenders: Evidence for dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 26, 138-147. doi:10.1037/a0034861
35.
MokrosA.StefanskaE. (2017, March). Sexual sadism among sexual murderers in the United Kingdom: An item response theory analysis (ICPS). Paper presented at the 2nd Biennial International Convention of Psychological Science, Vienna, Austria.
36.
MurrayA.McKenzieK.BoothT.MurrayG. (2013). Estimating the level of functional ability of children identified as likely to have an intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4009-4016. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.008
37.
NitschkeJ.MokrosA.OsterheiderM.MarshallW. L. (2013). Sexual Sadism: Current diagnostic vagueness and the benefit of behavioral definitions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 1441-1453. doi:10.1177/0306624X12465923
38.
NitschkeJ.OsterheiderM.MokrosA. (2009). A cumulative scale of severe sexual sadism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 262-278. doi:10.1177/1079063209342074
39.
PflugradtD. M.AllenB. P. (2013). Identifying sadists among female sexual offenders using the cumulative scale of Severe Sexual Sadism. Sexual Offender Treatment, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offendertreatment.org/116.html
40.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org/
42.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
43.
RichardsH.JacksonR. L. (2011). Behavioral discriminators of sexual sadism and paraphilia nonconsent in a sample of civilly committed sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 207-227. doi:10.1177/0306624X10377073
44.
SijtsmaK.MolenaarI. W. (1987). Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory. Psychometrika, 52, 79-97. doi:10.1007/BF02293957
45.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: Author.
46.
StraatJ. H.van der ArkL. A.SijtsmaK. (2014). Minimum sample size requirements for Mokken scale analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 809-822. doi:10.1177/0013164414529793
47.
UrbaniokF.EndrassJ.RosseggerA.NollT.GalloW. T.AngstJ. (2007). The prediction of criminal recidivism: The implication of sampling in prognostic models. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 257, 129-134. doi:10.1007/s00406-006-0678-y
48.
Van SchuurW. H. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11, 139-163. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg002
49.
World Health Organization (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva, Belgium: World Health Organization.
50.
YatesP. M.HuckerS. J.KingstonD. A. (2008). Sexual sadism: Psychopathology and theory. In LawsD. R.O’DonohueW. T. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 213-230). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
YoudenW. J. (1950). Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 3, 32-35. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3
52.
ZhangJ.StoutW. (1999). The theoretical DETECT index of dimensionality and its application to approximate simple structure. Psychometrika, 64, 213-249. doi:10.1007/BF02294536
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
