The current study explored narrative roles among individuals convicted of a sexual offense. Narrative roles in a criminal context are defined as specific personal accounts utilized by offenders to justify illegal behavior. The chosen theoretical framework recognized four primary offender roles: Revengeful Mission/Romantic Quest, Professional, Victim, and Tragic Hero. A total of 23 interviews were conducted with individuals convicted of a sexual offense (n = 11 contact, n = 12 noncontact) to explore and compare narrative roles between contact and noncontact offenders. Interviews were conducted using a phenomenological approach and coded via Framework Analysis, a qualitative data analytic method. Findings revealed a general pattern of narrative themes among offenders, along with a tendency for contact offenders to endorse Revengeful Mission/Romantic Quest narrative roles and noncontact offenders to endorse Tragic Hero narrative roles. Findings suggest that incorporating narrative roles into conceptualization and treatment of sexual offenders may help with tailoring treatments more effectively.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ. (2015). Treatment of high-risk sexual offenders: An integrated approach. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
AckermanA. R.HarrisA. J.LevensonJ. S.ZgobaK. (2011). Who are the people in your neighborhood? A descriptive analysis of individuals on public sex offender registries. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 149-159.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2001). The Level of Service Inventory—Revised user’s manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
CanterD.YoungsD. (2009). Investigative psychology: Offender profiling and the analysis of criminal action. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
5.
CanterD.YoungsD. (2012). Narratives of criminal action and forensic psychology. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 262-275.
6.
CreswellJohn. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DigardL. (2014). Encoding risk: Probation work and sex offenders’ narrative identities. Punishment & Society, 16, 428-447.
8.
ElliottI. A.BeechA. R.Mandeville-NordenR. (2013). The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 25, 3-20.
9.
ElliottI. A.BeechA. R.Mandeville-NordenR.HayesE. (2009). Psychological profiles of internet sexual offenders: Comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 21, 76-92.
10.
FarmerM.McAlindenA. M.MarunaS. (2015). Understanding desistance from sexual offending: A thematic review of research findings. Probation Journal, 62, 320-335.
11.
GaleN. K.HeathG.CameronE.RashidS.RedwoodS. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 117.
12.
GiorgiA. (1997). The theory, practice and evaluation of the phenomenological methods as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235-260.
13.
HamiltonE. (2017). Identity concerns among sexual offenders: The narrative call. Practice Innovations, 2, 13-20. doi:10.1037/pri0000039
14.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865-891.
15.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (Report No. 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
16.
HarrisA. J.Lobanov-RostovskyC. (2010). Implementing the Adam Walsh Act’s sex offender registration and notification provisions: A survey of the states. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21, 202-222.
17.
HarrisD. A. (2014). Desistance from sexual offending: Findings from 21 life history narratives. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1554-1578.
18.
HudsonS. M.WardT.McCormackJ. C. (1999). Offense pathways in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 779-798.
19.
IoannouM.CanterD. V.YoungsD. E. (2017). Criminal narrative experience: Relating emotions to offence narrative roles during crime commission. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 1531-1553. doi:10.1177/0306624X15625991
20.
LawsD. R.HudsonS. M.WardT. (2000). The original model of relapse prevention with sex offenders: Promises unfulfilled. In LawsD. R.HudsonS. M.WardT. (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 3-24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
MannR. E.WebsterS. D.SchofieldC.MarshallW. L. (2004). Approach versus avoidance goals in relapse prevention with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 16, 65-75.
22.
MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (1990). Issues in sexual assault. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 3-7). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
23.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2014). Psychological treatment of sex offenders: Recent innovations. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 37, 163-171.
24.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
MarunaS.LeBelT. (2003). Welcome home? Examining the reentry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4, 91-107.
26.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.
McAdamsD. P.HoffmanB. J.MansfieldE. D.DayR. (1996). Themes of agency and communion in significant autobiographical scenes. Journal of Personality, 64, 339-377.
29.
McAdamsD. P.McLeanK. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 233-238.
30.
McAdamsD. P.PalsJ. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.
31.
MotivansM.KyckelhahnT. (2007). Federal prosecution of child sex exploitation offenders, 2006. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
32.
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
33.
PhamA. T.NunesK. L.MaimoneS. (2016). Can researchers measure criminal history, sexual deviance, and risk of sexual recidivism from self-report information alone? Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA)Forum Newsletter, 28(4).
34.
PresserL. (2009). The narratives of offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 177-200.
35.
PresserL. (2016). Criminology and the narrative turn. Crime Media Culture, 12, 137-151.
36.
PresserL.SandbergS. (Eds.). (2015). Narrative criminology: Understanding stories of crime. New York: New York University Press.
37.
RauthmannJ. F.KolarG. P. (2013). Positioning the Dark Triad in the interpersonal circumplex: The friendly-dominant narcissist, hostile-submissive Machiavellian, and hostile-dominant psychopath?Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 622-627.
38.
RobertielloG.TerryK. J. (2007). Can we profile sex offenders? A review of sex offender typologies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 508-518.
39.
SandbergS. (2010). What can “lies” tell us about life? Notes towards a framework of narrative criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 447-465.
40.
SchachterE. P. (2011). Narrative identity construction as a goal-oriented endeavor: Reframing the issue of “big vs. small” story research. Theory & Psychology, 21, 107-113.
41.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597-630.
42.
TrumanJ. (2011). National Crime Victimization Survey 2010. Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv10.pdf
43.
WakelingH. C.WebsterS. D.MannR. E. (2005). Sexual offenders’ treatment experience: A qualitative and quantitative investigation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 171-186.
44.
WaldramJ. B. (2008). The narrative challenge to cognitive behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 32, 421-439.
45.
WardT. (2010). The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: Basic assumptions, aetiological commitments, and practice implications. In McNeilF.RaynorP.TrotterC. (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 41-64). New York, NY: Willan.
46.
WardT.GannonT. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive Good Lives Model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77-94.
47.
WardT.HudsonS. M. (1998). A model of the relapse process in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 700-725.
48.
WardT.MarshallB. (2007). Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 279-297.
49.
WardT.MarunaS. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the narrative identity and offender rehabilitation risk assessment paradigm. London, England: Routledge.
50.
WareJ.MannR. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 279-288.
51.
WigginsJ. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In CicchettiD.GroveW. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
WinderB.GoughB. (2010). “I never touched anybody—that’s my defence”: A qualitative analysis of internet sex offender accounts. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 125-141.
53.
YatesP. M. (2005). Pathways to the treatment of sexual offenders: Rethinking intervention. Forum, 17, 1-9.
54.
YatesP. M.KingstonD. A. (2006). The self-regulation model of sexual offending: The relationship between offence pathways and static and dynamic sexual offence risk. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(3), 259-270.
55.
YoungsD. (2004). Personality correlates of offence style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 99-119.
56.
YoungsD.CanterD. (2012a). Narrative roles in criminal action: An integrative framework for differentiating offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 233-249.
57.
YoungsD.CanterD. (2012b). Offenders’ crime narratives as revealed by the Narrative Roles Questionnaire (NRQ). International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 17, 1-23.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
