Retention of sex offenders to the completion of treatment is critical to program adherence to risk need responsivity (RNR) principles; however, it is also important to consider the potential interaction between attrition and treatment outcomes such as reoffending. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of changes to treatment delivery in a residential sex offender treatment program (SOTP), including introduction of rolling groups and systematic emphasis on positive therapist characteristics, on likelihood of program noncompletion (n = 652). Pooled regression modeling indicated that these operational interventions were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of program completion. We also examined whether variance in rates of participant attrition was related to reoffending outcomes for program completers (n = 494). Incidence of attrition within completing participants’ treatment cohorts had a significant negative association with hazard of sexual reoffending that was not accounted for by pretreatment risk. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for treatment delivery processes that aim to optimize both participant retention and treatment effectiveness.
AckermanS. J.HilsenrothM. J. (2001). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques negatively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy, 38, 171-185. doi:10.1037//0033-3204.38.2.171
2.
AckermanS. J.HilsenrothM. J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1-33. doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00146-0
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1995). Level of Supervision-Revised (LSI-R): An offender assessment system. User’s guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
5.
BeechA.FordhamA.S. (1997). Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 219-237. doi.org/10.1007/bf02675066
6.
BeechA. R.Hamilton-GiachritsisC. A. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in group-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 127-140. doi:10.1007/s11194-005-4600-3
7.
BeykoM. J.WongS. C. P. (2005). Predictors of treatment attrition as indicators for program improvement not offender shortcomings: A study of sex offender treatment attrition. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 375-389. doi:10.1177/107906320501700403
8.
DrapeauM.KörnerC.GrangerL.BrunetL.CasparF. (2005). A plan analysis of pedophile sexual abuser’s motivation for treatment: A qualitative pilot study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 308-324. doi:10.1177/0306624x04272853
9.
FrostA.ConnollyM. (2004). Reflexivity, reflection, and the change process in offender work. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 365-380. doi:10.1023/b:sebu.0000043329.65730.ff
10.
FrostA.WareJ.BoerD. P. (2009). An integrated groupwork methodology for working with sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 21-38. doi:10.1080/13552600802593535
11.
GalinskyM.SchoplerJ. (1989). Developmental patterns in open-ended groups. Social Work With Groups, 12, 99-114. doi:10.1300/j009v12n02_08
12.
GendreauP.GrantB. A.LeipcigerM.CollinsC. (1979). Norms and recidivism rates for the MMPI and selected experimental scales on a Canadian delinquent sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 11, 21-31. doi:10.1037/h0081569
13.
GrahamH. M. (1999). Help or hindrance? An examination of the effectiveness of children’s grief support groups. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 2227.
14.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891. doi:10.1177/0093854809338545
15.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.348
16.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the Collaborative Outcome Data Project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194. doi:10.1177/107906320201400207
17.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1023/a:1005482921333
18.
HarkinsL.BeechA. (2007). Measurement of the effectiveness of sex offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 36-44. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.03.002
19.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
20.
HoffmanS.GedankenS.ZimS. (1993). Open group therapy at a University counseling service. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 43, 485-490.
21.
HoldsworthE.BowenE.BrownS.HowatD. (2014). Offender engagement in group programs and associations with offender characteristics and treatment factors: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 102-121. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.01.004
22.
HowardM. V. A. (2016). Process evaluation of the Custody Based Intensive (CUBIT) programs for sex offenders: Factors associated with program completion (Research Bulletin No. 55). Sydney, Australia: Corrective Services New South Wales.
23.
JenningsJ. L.DemingA. (2015). Review of the empirical and clinical support for group therapy specific to sexual abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29, 731-764. doi:10.1177/1079063215618376
24.
LarochelleS.DiguerL.LaverdiereO.GreenmanP. S. (2011). Predictors of psychological treatment noncompletion among sexual offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 554-562. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.004
25.
LevensonJ.MacgowanM. (2004). Engagement, denial, and treatment progress among sex offenders in group therapy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 49-63. doi:10.1177/107906320401600104
26.
LevensonJ.PrescottD.D’AmoraD. (2010). Sex offender treatment: Consumer satisfaction and engagement in therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 307-326. doi:10.1177/0306624x08328752
27.
LovinsB.LowenkampC.LatessaE. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse?Prison Journal, 89, 344-357. doi:10.1177/0032885509339509
28.
LowenkampC.LatessaE. (2004). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 501-528. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00021.x
29.
MagerW.MilichR.HarrisM. J.HowardA. (2005). Intervention groups for adolescents with conduct problems: Is aggregation harmful or helpful?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 349-362. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3572-6
30.
MannR. E.WebsterS. D.WakelingH. C.KeylockH. (2013). Why do sexual offenders refuse treatment?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 191-206. doi:10.1080/13552600.2012.703701
31.
MarshallW. L. (2005). Therapist style in sexual offender treatment: Influence on indices of change. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 109-116. doi:10.1177/107906320501700202
32.
MarshallW. L. (2009). Manualization: A blessing or a curse?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 109-120. doi:10.1080/13552600902907320
33.
MarshallW. L.BurtonD. L. (2010). The importance of group processes in offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 141-149. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.008
34.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.FernandezY. M.MalcolmP. B.MouldenH. M. (2008). The Rockwood Preparatory Program for sexual offenders: Description and preliminary appraisal. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 25-42. doi:10.1177/1079063208314818
35.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.SerranG. A.FernandezY. M. (2006). Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
MarshallW. L.SerranG. A.FernandezY.MulloyR.MannR.ThorntonD. (2003). Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: Tentative data on their relationship with indices of behaviour change. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9, 25-30. doi:10.1080/355260031000137940
37.
MarshallW. L.SerranG. A.MouldenH.MulloyR.FernandezY. M.MannR. E.ThorntonD. (2002). Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: Their reliable identification and influence on behaviour change. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 395-405. doi:10.1002/cpp.335
38.
MarshallW. L.ThorntonD.MarshallL. E.FernandezY. M.MannR. E. (2001). Treatment of sex offenders who are in categorical denial: A pilot project. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 205-215. doi:10.1177/107906320101300305
39.
McMurranM.TheodosiE. (2007). Is treatment non-completion associated with increased reconviction over no treatment?Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 333-343. doi:10.1080/10683160601060374
40.
MillerW. R.RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
MoosR. (1994). Group environment scale manual: Development, applications, research (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
42.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6-21. doi:10.1037/a0022200
43.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P. (2013). Treatment programs for high risk sexual offenders: Program and offender characteristics, attrition, treatment change and recidivism. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 579-591. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.06.002
44.
PelissierB. (2007). Treatment retention in a prison-based residential sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 333-346. doi:10.1177/107906320701900401
45.
RiceM.HarrisG. T. (2003). The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 989, 428-440. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07323.x
46.
RossE.PolaschekD.WardT. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 462-480. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.003
47.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
48.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597-630. doi:10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
49.
SerranG.FernandezY.MarshallW. L.MannR. (2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sex offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 368-374. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.368
50.
SheehanP.WareJ. (2012). Preparing sex offenders for treatment: A preliminary evaluation of a preparatory program. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 4, 3-11. doi:10.1002/9780470713457.ch14
51.
SpiranovicC. (2012). The Static-99 and Static-99R norms project: Developing norms based on Western Australian sex offenders. Crawley: Crime Research Centre, University of Western Australia.
52.
SribneyC.ReddonJ. (2009). Adolescent sex offenders’ rankings of therapeutic factors using the Yalom Card Sort. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 24-40. doi:10.1080/10509670801940367
53.
TourignyM.HebertM. (2007). Comparison of open versus closed group interventions for sexually abused adolescent girls. Violence and Victims, 22, 334-349. doi:10.1891/088667007780842775
54.
WaltersG. D. (2016). Predicting recidivism with the Criminal Sentiments Scale: A meta-analysis of a putative measure of criminal thought content. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1159-1172. doi:10.1177/0093854816649004
55.
WareJ.BrightD. A. (2008). Evolution of a treatment programme for sex offenders: Changes to the New South Wales Custody-Based Intensive Treatment (CUBIT). Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15, 340-349. doi:10.1080/13218710802014543
56.
WareJ.FrostA.HoyA. (2009). A review of the use of therapeutic communities with sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 721-742. doi:10.1177/0306624x09343169
57.
WatkinsI. (2011). The utility of Level of Service Inventory–Revised (LSI-R) assessments within NSW correctional environments (Research Bulletin No. 29). Sydney, Australia: Corrective Services New South Wales.
58.
WoodrowA.BrightD. (2011). Effectiveness of a sex offender treatment programme: A risk band analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 43-55. doi:10.1177/0306624x09352162
59.
WormithJ. S.OlverM. E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 447-471. doi:10.1177/0093854802029004006
60.
YalomI. (1975). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
