Enhancing the Reproducibility of Research Findings

Head M. L. Holman L. Lanfear R. Kahn A. T. Jennions M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLOS Biology, 13(3), e1002106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106

Kjaergard L. Als-Nielsen B. (2002). Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ, 325(7358), 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7358.249

Open Science Collaboration. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Simmons J. P. Nelson L. Simonsohn U. (2012). A 21 Word Solution. Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588

Wasserstein R. L. Lazar N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108