Prison Experience and Reoffending: Exploring the Relationship Between Prison Terms,Institutional Treatment,Infractions,and Recidivism for Sex Offenders

Abstract

Given that sex offenders have been found to serve longer prison terms compared with other types of violent criminals, it has been suggested that the influence of imprisonment may impact subsequent reoffending. However, institutional factors are often overlooked in risk assessment studies and very few risk assessment instruments include institutional items within their models. The current study explores prison experience explanations for recidivism among convicted sex offenders and indicates that, with respect to time served, both institutional treatment and institutional infractions demonstrate a significant impact. Findings indicate that misconduct in custody was positively associated with revocation and sexual recidivism. Moreover, longer periods of incarceration significantly increase postrelease reoffending for high-risk sex offenders. Policy implications are made regarding further modifications to risk assessment instruments that will take into account institutional risk factors.

Keywords

prison misconduct prison term treatment recidivism risk factors sex offender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2003). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: MultiHealth systems.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Group.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27.

Bonta

Rugge

Dauvergne

(2003). The reconviction rate of federal offenders (User Report 2003-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

Budd

Desmond

S. A.

(2014). Sex offenders and sex crime recidivism: Investigating the role of sentence length and time served. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1481-1499.

Chen

M. K.

Shapiro

J. M.

(2007). Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. American Law and Economics Review, 9, 1-29.

Clemmer

(1940). The prison community. Boston, MA: Christopher.

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

Stewart

E. A.

(2014). Does inmate behavior affect post-release offending? Investigating the misconduct-recidivism relationship among youth and adults. Justice Quarterly, 31, 1044-1073.

10.

Costanzo

Krauss

Schuller

McLachlan

(2014). Forensic and legal psychology: Psychological science applied to law, first Canadian edition. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

11.

de Vries Robbé

de Vogel

Douglas

K. S

. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 24, 440-457.

12.

de Vries Robbé

de Vogel

Koster

Bogaerts

. (2015). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 51-70.

13.

de Vries Robbé

de Vogel

Stam

. (2012). Protective factors for violence risk: The value for clinical practice. Psychology, 3, 1259-1263.

14.

de Vries Robbé

Mann

R. E.

Maruna

Thornton

. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27, 16-33.

15.

Doren

D. M.

(2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Doren

D. M.

(2009). Actuarial risk assessments in USA courtroom. In Beech

Craig

Browne

(Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook (pp. 551-566). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.

17.

Drago

Galbiati

Vertova

(2011). Prison conditions and recidivism. American Law and Economics Review, 13, 103-130.

18.

Drake

E. K.

Barnoski

(2006). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Key findings and trends (Document No. 06-03-1201). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

19.

Duwe

Freske

P. J.

(2012). Using logistic regression modeling to predict sexual recidivism of the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool–3 (MnSOST-3). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 350-377.

20.

Duwe

Goldman

R. A.

(2009). The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 279-307.

21.

Epperson

D. L.

Kaul

J. D.

Huot

S. J.

(1995, October). Predicting risk of recidivism for incarcerated sex offenders: Updated development on the Sex Offender Screening Tool (SOST). Paper presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New Orleans, LA.

22.

Gendreau

Little

Goggin

(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works. Criminology, 34, 575-607.

23.

Gentry

A. L.

Dulmus

C. N.

Theriot

M. T.

(2005). Comparing sex offender risk classification using the Static-99 and LSI-R assessment instruments. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 557-563.

24.

Grady

M. D.

Edwards

Jr. Pettus-Davis

(2017). A longitudinal outcome evaluation of a prison-based sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29(3): 239-266. doi:10.1177/1079063215585731

25.

Grady

M. D.

Edwards

Jr. Pettus-Davis

Abramson

(2012). Does volunteering for sex offender treatment matter? Using propensity score analysis to understand the effects of volunteerism and treatment on recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 319-346.

26.

Hall

G. C. N.

(1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 802-809.

27.

Hanson

K. R.

Gordon

Harris

A. J. R.

Marques

J. K.

Murphy

Quinsey

V. L.

Seto

M. C.

(2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.

28.

Hanson

R. K.

(1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

29.

Hanson

R. K.

Bussière

M. T.

(1996). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: A meta-analysis (User Report 1996-04). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

30.

Hanson

R. K.

Bussière

M. T.

(1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.

31.

Hanson

R. K.

Harris

(2000). The Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A method for measuring change in risk levels (User Report 2000-1). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

32.

Hanson

R. K.

Morton-Bourgon

(2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (User Report 2004-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

33.

Hanson

R. K.

Morton-Bourgon

(2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediciotn studies. Psychological Assesment, 21(1), 1-21.

34.

Hanson

R. K.

Thornton

(1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety.

35.

Hanson

R. K.

Thornton

(2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (User Report 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

36.

Harris

A. J. R.

Hanson

R. K.

(2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (User Report 2004-03). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.

37.

Heil

Harrison

English

Ahlmeyer

(2009). Is prison sexual offending indicative of community risk? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 892-908.

38.

Helmus

Thornton

Hanson

R. K.

Babchishin

K. M.

(2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64-101.

39.

Hochstetler

DeLisi

(2005). Importation, deprivation, and varieties of serving time: An integrated-lifestyle-exposure model of prison offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 257-266.

40.

Irwin

Cressey

D. R.

(1962). Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10, 142-155.

41.

Jackson

R. L.

Hess

D. T.

(2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 425-448.

42.

Listwan

S. J.

Sullivan

C. J.

Agnew

Cullen

F. T.

Colvin

(2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30, 144-168.

43.

Lösel

Schmucker

(2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Ciminolgoy, 1, 117-146.

44.

Nagin

D. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

(2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice, 38, 115-200.

45.

Nunes

K. L.

Firestone

Wexler

A. F.

Jensen

T. L.

Bradford

J. M.

(2007). Incarceration and recidivism among sexual offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 305-318.

46.

Polizzi

D. M.

MacKenzie

D. L.

Hickman

L. J.

(1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison- and non-prison-based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357-374.

47.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

Blevins

K. R.

Daigle

L. E.

Madensen

T. D.

(2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In Cullen

F. T.

Wright

J. P.

Blevins

K. R.

(Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological, advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 367-395). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

48.

Quinsey

V. L.

Harris

G. T.

Rice

M. E.

Cormier

C. A.

(1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

49.

Ragusa-Salerno

L. M.

Ostermann

Thomas

S. S.

(2013). Does the LSI-R have utility for sex offenders? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(9), 952-969.

50.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 301-340.

51.

Schmucker

Lösel

(2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Ciminolgoy, 11, 597-630.

52.

Sykes

(1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

53.

Tewksbury

Connor

D. P.

Denney

A. S.

(2014). Disciplinary infractions behind bars: An exploration of importation and deprivation theories. Criminal Justice Review, 39, 201-218.

54.

Tiedt

A. D.

Sabol

W. J.

(2015). Sentence length and recidivism among prisoners released across 30 states in 2005: Accounting for individual histories and state clustering effects. Justice Research and Police, 16(1), 50-64.

55.

Toman

E. L.

Cochran

J. C.

Cochran

J. K.

Bales

W. D.

(2015). The implications of sentence length for inmate adjustment to priosn life. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 510-521.

56.

Trulson

C. R.

DeLisi

Caudill

J. W.

Belshaw

Marquart

J. W.

(2010). Delinquent careers behind bars. Criminal Justice Review, 35, 200-219.

57.

Trulson

C. R.

DeLisi

Marquart

J. W.

(2011). Institutional misconduct, delinquent background, and rearrest frequency among serious and violent delinquent offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 709-731.

58.

Valentine

C. L.

(2012). Unraveling the age, prison misconduct, and recidivism relationship (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.

59.

Walsh

(1984). Differential sentencing patterns among felony sex offenders and non-sex offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 443-458.

60.

Ward

Brown

(2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 243-257.

61.

Washington State Sentencing Guidelines Commission. (2004). Sex offender sentencing: Sentencing guidelines commission. Olympia: Author.

62.

Yates

P. M.

(2013). Treatment of sexual offenders: Research, best practices, and emerging models. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8(3-4), 89-95.

63.

Zgoba

K. M.

Miner

Knight

Letourneau

Levenson

Thornton

(2012). A multi-state recidivism study using Static-99R and Static-2002 risk scores and tier guidelines from the Adam Walsh Act (NCJ 240099). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.