Smartphone dating applications (apps) have become popular in recent years. However, the association between the use of dating apps and sexual abuse remains uninvestigated. The aim of this study was to examine the association between using dating apps and the sexual abuse of males and females. Six hundred sixty-six participants were recruited in four universities in Hong Kong in 2015. Overall, the 1-year prevalence of sexual abuse was 12.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [9.8, 14.9]) and the lifetime prevalence was 14.2% (95% CI: [11.5, 16.9]). Multiple logistic regressions found that users of dating apps (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.13, p < .05) were more likely to be sexually abused in the past year than non-users. Using dating apps was also a risk factor of lifetime sexual abuse (aOR: 1.83, p < .05). Our findings suggest that app users should deserve more attention in risk assessment, risk stratification, and sexual abuse prevention programs.
BauermeisterJ. A.Leslie-SantanaM.JohnsM. M.PingelE.EisenbergA. (2011). Mr. Right and Mr. Right Now: Romantic and casual partner-seeking online among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 261-272.
2.
BeymerM. R.WeissR. E.BolanR. K.RudyE. T.BourqueL. B.RodriguezJ. P.MoriskyD. E. (2014). Sex on demand: Geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 90, 567-572. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2013-051494
3.
BienC. H.BestJ. M.MuessigK. E.WeiC.HanL.TuckerJ. D. (2015). Gay apps for seeking sex partners in China: Implications for MSM sexual health. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 941-946.
4.
Blunt-VintiH. D.WheldonC.McFarlaneM.BroganN.Walsh-BuhiE. R. (2016). Assessing relationship and sexual satisfaction in adolescent relationships formed online and offline. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 11-16.
5.
BowlingA. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health, 27, 281-291.
6.
BrayfordJ.CoweF.DeeringJ. (2013). Sex offenders: Punish, help, change or control? Theory, policy and practice explored. Abingdon Oxfordshire OX14 4RN: Taylor & Francis.
7.
BriereJ. N.ElliottD. M. (1994). Immediate and long-term impacts of child sexual abuse. The Future of Children, 4, 54-69.
8.
CampbellR.TownsendS. M.LongS. M.KinnisonK. E.PulleyE. M.AdamesS. B.WascoS. M. (2006). Responding to sexual assault victims’ medical and emotional needs: A national study of the services provided by SANE programs. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 384-398.
9.
ChanK. L.StrausM. A.BrownridgeD. A.TiwariA.LeungW.-C. (2008). Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 53, 529-537.
10.
ChoiE.WongJ.FongD. (2017). The use of social networking applications of smartphone and associated sexual risks in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: A systematic review. AIDS Care, 29, 145-155. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1211606
11.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
12.
DeanA.ArnerT.SunkiG.FriedmanR.LantingaM.SangamS.. . . GaoZ. (2007). Epi Info™, a database and statistics program for public health professionals. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
13.
FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J.WolakJ. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation’s youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
14.
FinkelhorD.OrmrodR.TurnerH.HambyS. L. (2005). The victimization of children and youth: A comprehensive, national survey. Child Maltreatment, 10, 5-25.
15.
FlackW. F.DaubmanK. A.CaronM. L.AsadorianJ. A.D’AureliN. R.GigliottiS. N.. . . StineE. R. (2007). Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 139-157.
16.
GageA. J.HutchinsonP. L. (2006). Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 11-24.
17.
GarciaJ. R.ReiberC.MasseyS. G.MerriwetherA. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161-176.
18.
HollowayI. W.PulsipherC. A.GibbsJ.Barman-AdhikariA.RiceE. (2015). Network influences on the sexual risk behaviors of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men using geosocial networking applications. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 112-122.
19.
HollowayI. W.RiceE.GibbsJ.WinetrobeH.DunlapS.RhoadesH. (2014). Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 285-296.
20.
HommaY.WangN.SaewycE.KishorN. (2012). The relationship between sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior among adolescent boys: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 18-24.
21.
HosmerD. W.Jr.LemeshowS. (2004). Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
22.
JenkinsS. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467-493.
23.
JordanC. E.CampbellR.FollingstadD. (2010). Violence and women’s mental health: The impact of physical, sexual, and psychological aggression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 607-628.
24.
Kendall-TackettK. (2002). The health effects of childhood abuse: Four pathways by which abuse can influence health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 715-729.
25.
KrakowB.MelendrezD.JohnstonL.WarnerT. D.ClarkJ. O.PachecoM.. . . SchraderR. (2002). Sleep-disordered breathing, psychiatric distress, and quality of life impairment in sexual assault survivors. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190, 442-452.
26.
LandovitzR. J.TsengC.-H.WeissmanM.HaymerM.MendenhallB.RogersK.. . . ShoptawS. (2013). Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. Journal of Urban Health, 90, 729-739.
27.
LeanderL.ChristiansonS. Å.GranhagP. A. (2008). Internet-initiated sexual abuse: Adolescent victims’ reports about on- and off-line sexual activities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1260-1274.
28.
LehmillerJ. J.IoergerM. (2014). Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e86603.
29.
MaleskyL. A.Jr. (2007). Predatory online behavior: Modus operandi of convicted sex offenders in identifying potential victims and contacting minors over the Internet. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16(2), 23-32.
30.
MarcumC. D. (2007). Interpreting the intentions of Internet predators: An examination of online predatory behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16(4), 99-114.
31.
MarganskiA.MelanderL. (2018). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 1071-1095. doi:10.1177/0886260515614283
32.
McGrathM. G.CaseyE. (2002). Forensic psychiatry and the internet: Practical perspectives on sexual predators and obsessional harassers in cyberspace. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 30, 81-94.
33.
McKillopN.BrownS.WortleyR.SmallboneS. (2015). How victim age affects the context and timing of child sexual abuse: Applying the routine activities approach to the first sexual abuse incident. Crime Science, 4, Article 17.
34.
MillerB. (2015). “They’re the modern-day gay bar”: Exploring the uses and gratifications of social networks for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 476-482.
35.
MishnaF.McLuckieA.SainiM. (2009). Real-world dangers in an online reality: A qualitative study examining online relationships and cyber abuse. Social Work Research, 33, 107-118.
36.
MonksS. M.TomakaJ.PalaciosR.ThompsonS. E. (2010). Sexual victimization in female and male college students: Examining the roles of alcohol use, alcohol expectancies, and sexual sensation seeking. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 2258-2280.
37.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (1999). A routine activity theory explanation for women’s stalking victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5, 43-62.
38.
National Crime Agency. (2016). Emerging new threat in online dating: Initial trends in internet dating-initiated serious sexual assaults. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/
39.
O’ConnellR. (2003). A typology of child cybersexploitation and online grooming practices. Preston, UK: University of Central.
40.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP. M. (2007). Who looks for casual dates on the internet? A test of the compensation and the recreation hypotheses. New Media & Society, 9, 455-474.
41.
PlattJ. J.BusbyD. M. (2009). Male victims: The nature and meaning of sexual coercion. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 217-226.
42.
RendinaH. J.JimenezR. H.GrovC.VentuneacA.ParsonsJ. T. (2014). Patterns of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men in New York City who use Grindr. AIDS and Behavior, 18, 41-49.
43.
RiggsN.HouryD.LongG.MarkovchickV.FeldhausK. M. (2000). Analysis of 1,076 cases of sexual assault. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 35, 358-362.
44.
SaewycE. M.MageeL. L.PettingellS. E. (2004). Teenage pregnancy and associated risk behaviors among sexually abused adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 98-105.
45.
SesarK.PavelaI.SimicN.BarisicM.BanaiB. (2012). The relation of jealousy and various forms of violent behavior in the relationships of adolescent. Paediatrics Today, 8, 133-146.
46.
SmithM. E. (2003). Recovery from intimate partner violence: A difficult journey. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24, 543-573.
47.
SoomarJ. N.FlisherA. J.MathewsC. (2009). Sexual coercion and adolescent risk behaviour: A systematic literature review. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 21, 103-126.
48.
SpielhoferT. (2010). Children’s online risks and safety: A review of the available evidence. Slough SL1 2DQ: National Foundation for Educational Research.
49.
StrausM. A. (2004). Scoring the CTS2 and CTSPC. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire
50.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
51.
SubrahmanyamK.GreenfieldP. (2008). Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18(1), 119-146.
WaltersM. L.ChenJ.BreidingM. J. (2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
54.
WhittleH.Hamilton-GiachritsisC.BeechA.CollingsG. (2013). A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 62-70.
