The purpose of the current study was to examine whether the MOLEST and RAPE scales and change on these measures predicted sexual recidivism in a sample of 146 adult male sexual offenders who participated in a high-intensity treatment program while incarcerated. The majority of subjects had functional scores on the MOLEST and RAPE scales prior to treatment. Of those who had dysfunctional pre-treatment scores, the majority made significant gains. However, the MOLEST and RAPE scales did not significantly predict sexual recidivism. This was the case for pre-treatment scores, post-treatment scores, and change scores. Our findings are generally not consistent with the view that these measures assess dynamic risk factors for sexual recidivism. However, this is the first published study to examine the predictive validity of these scales and more rigorous research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89-103. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(84)2990008-6
2.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampN.BeckerJ. V.RathnerJ. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions in child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135-152. doi:10.1007/BF00851319
3.
AbracenJ.LoomanJ. (2004). Issues in the treatment of sexual offenders: Recent developments and directions for future research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 229-246. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00074-X
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5.
BarnettG. D.WakelingH.Mandeville-NordenR.RakestrowJ. (2013). Does change in psychometric test scores tell us anything about risk of reconviction in sexual offenders?Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 85-110. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.607820
6.
BeckettR. C. (1987). Children and Sex Questionnaire. Oxford, UK: Oxford Forensic Services.
7.
BeechA. R. (1998). A psychometric typology of child abusers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 319-339.
8.
BeechA. R.BartelsR. M.DixonL. (2013). Assessment and treatment of distorted schemas in sexual offenders. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 54-66. doi: 10.1177/1524838012463970
9.
BeechA. R.FisherD.BeckettR. (1999). STEP3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme (Home Office occasional paper). London, England: Home Office.
10.
BeechA. R.FordH. (2006). The relationship between risk, deviance, treatment outcome and sexual reconviction in a sample of child sexual abusers completing residential treatment for their offending. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 685-701. doi:10.1080/10683160600558493
11.
BeechA. R.Mandeville-NordenR.GoodwillA. (2012). Comparing recidivism rates of treatment responders/nonresponders in a sample of 413 child molesters who had completed community-based sex offender treatment in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 29-49. doi:10.1177/0306624X1038781
12.
BeechA. R.OliverC.FisherD.BeckettR. C. (2005). Step 4: The sex offender treatment programme in prison: Addressing the needs of rapists and sexual murderers. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
13.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2011). Treatment gain for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182-192. doi:10.1037/a0022900
14.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
15.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
16.
CannS.KonopaskyR. J.McGrathM. L. (1995, June). Chi-Mo: A new measure of cognitive distortions in sexual offenders. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the Canadian Psychological Association, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
17.
CohenJ. (1988). A power primer. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 112, 155-159.
DouglasK. S.SkeemJ. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347-383.
20.
EastmanB. J. (2004). Assessing the efficacy of treatment for adolescent sex offenders: A cross-over longitudinal study. The Prison Journal, 84, 472-485. doi:10.1300/J076v42n03_02
21.
FeelgoodS.CortoniF.ThompsonA. (2005). Sexual coping, general coping and cognitive distortions in incarcerated rapists and child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 157-170. doi:10.1080/13552600500073657
22.
FeildH. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156-179.
23.
GannonT. A.PolaschekD. L. L. (2006). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: A re-examination of key theories and research. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1000-1019. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.010
24.
GannonT. A.WardT.CollieR. (2007). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: Theoretical and research developments over the past two decades. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 402-416. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.005
25.
HallG. C. N.HirschmanR. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662-669.
26.
HallG. C. N.HirschmanR. (1992). Sexual aggression against children: A conceptual perspective of etiology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 8-23. doi:10.1177/0093854892019001003
27.
HansonR. K.GizzarelliR.ScottH. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187-202.
28.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. D. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
29.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Report No. 2004-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
30.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (Corrections Research User Report No. 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 198-210. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07306.x
33.
HedgesL. V.VeveaJ. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
34.
HelmusL.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 34-53. doi:10.1177/1524838012462244
35.
HermannC. A.BabchishinK. M.NunesK. L.Leth-SteensenC.CortoniF. (2012). Factor structure of the Bumby RAPE scale: A two-factor model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 869-886. doi:10.1177/0093854812436802
36.
HudsonS. M.WalesD. S.BakkerL.WardT. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119. doi:10.1177/107906320201400203
37.
JacobsonN. S.FolletteW. C.RevenstorfD. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.
38.
JacobsonN. S.TruaxP. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
39.
KeelingJ. A.RoseJ. L.BeechA. R. (2006). A comparison of the application of the self-regulation model of the relapse process for mainstream and special needs sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 373-382. doi:10.1080/14789940600658293
40.
KeelingJ. A.RoseJ. L.BeechA. R. (2007). Comparing sexual offender treatment efficacy: Mainstream sexual offenders and sexual offenders with special needs. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 117-124.
41.
KnightR. A.PrentkyR. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), The handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 23-52). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
42.
KraemerH. C.KazdinA. E.OffordD. R.KesslerR. C.JensenP. S.KuplerD. J. (1997). Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 337-343. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160065009
43.
LindsayW. R.WhitefieldE.CarsonD. (2007). An assessment for attitudes consistent with sexual offending for use with offenders with intellectual disabilities. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 55-68.
44.
LoomanJ.AbracenJ.SerinR.MarquisP. (2005). Psychopathy, treatment change and recidivism in high risk high need sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 549-568. doi:10.1177/0886260504271583
45.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 1-29.
46.
MalamuthN. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 33-58. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07292.x
47.
Mandeville-NordenR.BeechA. R. (2009). Development of a psychometric typology of child molesters: Implications for treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 307-325. doi:10.1177/0886260508316479
48.
Mandeville-NordenR.BeechA. R.HayesE. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of a UK community-based sexual offender treatment programme for child abusers. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 14, 493-512. doi:10.1080/10683160801948907
49.
MannR. E.BeechA. R. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories. In WardT.LawsD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
51.
MannR. E.WebsterS.WakelingH.MarshallW. (2007). The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 443-458.
52.
MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257-275). New York, NY: Plenum.
53.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.SachdevS.KrugerR.-L. (2003). Distorted attitudes and perceptions, and their relationship with self-esteem and coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 171-181.
54.
MarunaS.CopesH. (2004). What have we learned in five decades of neutralization research?Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 32, 221-320.
55.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177. doi:10.1348/135532506X114608
56.
McGrathR. J.CummingG. F.BurchardB. L.ZeoliS.EllerbyL. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
57.
NicholsH. R.MolinderI. (1984). The Multiphasic Sex Inventory: A test to assess psychosexual characteristics of the sexual offender. Tacoma, WA: Nichols & Molinder.
58.
NunesK. L.BabchishinK. M.CortoniF. (2011). Measuring treatment change in sex offenders: Clinical and statistical significance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 157-173. doi:10.1177/0093854810391054
59.
NunesK. L.HermannC. A.RatcliffeK. (2013). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards rape are associated with sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 2657-2675. doi: 10.1177/0886260513487995
60.
NunesK. L.JungS. (2013). Are cognitive distortions associated with denial and minimization among sex offenders?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 166-188. doi:10.1177/1079063212453941
61.
NunesK. L.PettersenC. (2011). Competitive disadvantage makes attitudes towards rape less negative. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 509-521.
62.
OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
63.
O’ReillyG.CarrA.MurphyP.CotterA. (2010). A controlled evaluation of a prison-based sexual offender intervention program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 95-111.
64.
PervanS.HunterM. (2007). Cognitive Distortions and social self-esteem in sexual offenders. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3, 75-91.
65.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
66.
RambowJ.ElsnerK.FeelgoodS.HoyerJ. (2008). Einstellungen zum kindesmissbrauch: Untersuchungen mit der Bumby Child Molest Scale bei missbrauchs- und gewalttätern [Attitudes toward child abuse: Using the Bumby Child Molest Scale in studies of sexual and violent offenders.]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 21, 341-355. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098723
SchneiderS. L.WrightR. C. (2001). The FoSOD: A measurement tool for reconceptualizing the role of denial in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 545-564. doi:10.1177/088626001016006004
69.
SetoM. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
70.
SewellR.NunesK. L. (2009, October). Cognitive distortions: A cumulative meta-analysis of the Bumby MOLEST scale. Poster presented at the 28th Annual Research and Treatment Conference for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
71.
TierneyD. W.McCabeM. P. (2001). An evaluation of self-report measures of cognitive distortions and empathy among Australian sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 495-519.
72.
WakelingH.BeechA. R.FreemantleN. (2013). Investigating treatment changes and its relationship to recidivism in a sample of 3773 sex offenders in the UK. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 233-252. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.626413
73.
WardT. (2000). Sex offenders’ cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 491-507.
74.
WardT.GannonT. A.KeownK. (2006). Beliefs, values, and action: The judgment model of cognitive distortions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 323-340. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.10.003
75.
WardT.HudsonS. M.JohnstonL.MarshallW. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(97)81034-3
76.
WardT.SiegertR. J. (2002). Toward a comprehensive theory of child sexual abuse: A theory knitting perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 319-351. doi:10.1080/10683160208401823
77.
WhitakerD. J.LeB.HansonR. K.BakerC. K.McMahonP. M.RyanG.. . .RiceD. D. (2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 529-548.
78.
WilliamsF.WakelingH.WebsterS. (2007). A psychometric study of six self-report measures for use with sexual offenders with cognitive and social functioning deficits. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 13, 505-522.
