The predictive accuracy of STABLE-2000 and STABLE-2007 was examined within a prospective research design in a German-speaking sample of 263 adult male prison-released sexual offenders followed up for an average of 6.4 years. The STABLE-2007 was significantly related to all outcomes (AUC = 0.67-0.71), whereas the STABLE-2000 demonstrated only weak predictive accuracy for sexual reoffense (AUC = 0.62). Supporting the results of the construction sample, the STABLE-2007 incrementally added to the predictive accuracy of the STATIC-99 for violent and general reoffense (conviction and incarceration). Moreover, the STABLE-2007 total scores and the nominal risk/need categories made significant incremental contributions over the SORAG for predicting sexual reoffense.
BackhausK.ErichsonB.PlinkeW.WeiberR. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate analyses: An introduction] (11., überarb. Aufl.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2.
BarbareeH. E.BlanchardR. (2008). Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reduction in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender. In LawsD. R.O’DonohueW. T. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 37-60). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LantonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
4.
BeggsS. M.GraceR. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: an independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual offender version. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234-251.
5.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20 (SVR-20): Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
DowdenC.AntonowiczD.AndrewsD. A. (2003). The effectiveness of relapse prevention with offenders: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 516-528.
8.
DucroC.PhamT. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the STATIC-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26.
9.
EherR.RettenbergerM.MatthesA. (2009). Aktuarische Prognose bei Sexualstraftätern. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie mit 785 Tätern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von relevanten Tätergruppen und Rückfallketegorie [Actuarial risk assessment in sexual offenders: Results of a prospective study focussing on relevant offender types and reoffense categories]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 92, 18-27.
10.
EherR.RettenbergerM.MatthesA.SchillingF. (2010). Stable dynamic risk factors in child sexual abusers: The incremental predictive power of Narcissistic personality traits beyond the STATIC-99/STABLE-2007 priority categories on sexual reoffense. Sexual Offender Treatment. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/2-2010_02.html
11.
EherR.RettenbergerM.SchillingF.PfaefflinF. (2008). Failure of STATIC-99 and SORAG to predict relevant reoffense categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: A prospective study. Sexual Offender Treatment. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/1-2008_02.html
12.
EndrassJ.UrbaniokF.HeldL.VetterS.RosseggerA. (2009). Accuracy of the STATIC-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 482-490.
13.
GailM. H.PfeifferR. M. (2005). On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk. Biostatistics., 6, 227-239.
14.
GrubinD. (1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk (Police Research Series). London, UK: Home Office.
15.
HansonR. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User report 97-04) Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
16.
HansonR. K. (2002). Recidivism and age follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.
17.
HansonR. K. (2006). Does STATIC-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders?Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 343-355.
18.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
19.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
20.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
21.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R. (2004). Scoring manuals for the Dynamic Supervision Project. Unpublished scoring manuals.
22.
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. RScottT. L.HelmusL. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections research user report 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/crp2007-05-en.pdf
23.
HansonR. K.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2010). Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: A multi-site study of STATIC-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198-211.
24.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
25.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
26.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
27.
HareR. D. (1991). Manual for the psychopathy-checklist-revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi Health Systems.
28.
HarrisA. J. R.HansonR. K. (2010). Clinical, actuarial, and dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Why do things keep changing?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 296-310.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Annals. New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 198-210.
31.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E. (2007). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging and the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 297-313.
32.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.LalumiereM. L.BoerD.LangC. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
LussierP.Deslauriers-VarinN.RatelT. (2010). A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.54, 71-91.
35.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217.
36.
OlverM. E.WongS. C.NicholaichukT.GordonA. (2007). The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale-sexual offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318-329.
QuinseyV. L.ColemanG.JonesB.AltrowsI. (1997). Proximal antecedents of eloping and reoffending among supervised mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 794-813.
39.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.CormierC. A. (1998). Violent offenders—Appraising and managing risk (1st ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
QuinseyV. L.HarrisA. J.RiceM. E.CormierB. M. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2006). Die deutsche Übersetzung und Adaptierung des STATIC-99 zur aktuarischen Kriminalprognose verurteilter Sexualstraftäter [German translation and validation of the STATIC-99 for the risk predictin in sexual offenders]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 89, 352-365.
42.
RettenbergerM.EherR. (2007). Predicting reoffence in sexual offender subtypes: A prospective validation study of the german version of the sexual offender risk appraisal guide (SORAG). Sexual Offender Treatment. Retrieved from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/51.html
43.
RettenbergerM.MatthesA.BoerD. P.EherR. (2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169-186.
44.
RiceM. E.HarrisG. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
45.
SetoM. C. (2005). Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 156-167.
46.
SetoM. C.HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.BarbareeH. E. (2004). The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 455-466.
47.
SjostedtG.LangstromN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the STATIC-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629-645.
48.
WilsonR. J. (1999). Emotional congruence in sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 33-47.
