There is much concern about the likelihood that online sexual offenders (particularly online child pornography offenders) have either committed or will commit offline sexual offenses involving contact with a victim. This study addresses this question in two meta-analyses: the first examined the contact sexual offense histories of online offenders, whereas the second examined the recidivism rates from follow-up studies of online offenders. The first meta-analysis found that approximately 1 in 8 online offenders (12%) have an officially known contact sexual offense history at the time of their index offense (k = 21, N = 4,464). Approximately one in two (55%) online offenders admitted to a contact sexual offense in the six studies that had self-report data (N = 523). The second meta-analysis revealed that 4.6% of online offenders committed a new sexual offense of some kind during a 1.5- to 6-year follow-up (k = 9, N = 2,630); 2.0% committed a contact sexual offense and 3.4% committed a new child pornography offense. The results of these two quantitative reviews suggest that there may be a distinct subgroup of online-only offenders who pose relatively low risk of committing contact sexual offenses in the future.
References marked with an asterisk were included in the meta-analyses.
2.
*Abondo, M., Bouvet, R., & Le Gueut, M. ( 2009, May). Le télécharagement de fichiers pédopornographiques signe-t-il une psychopathologie? A propos d’une étude d’expertises psychiatriques en France [Does downloading child pornography indicate a psychopathology? Results from a study of psychiatric expertise in France]. Paper presented at the Cinquième congrès international francophone sur l’agression sexuelle [5th International Francophone Conference on Sexual Aggression], Montréal, Québec, Canada.
3.
*Baartz, D. ( 2008, June). Australians, the internet and technology-enabled child sex abuse: A statistical profile. Canberra, Australia: Australian Federal Police.
4.
Babchishin, K.M., Hanson, R.K., & Hermann, C.A. (in press). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
5.
*Barnett, G.D., Wakeling, H.C., & Howard, P. (in press). An examination of the predictive validity of the Risk Matrix 2000 in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
6.
Bartosh, D.L., Garby, T., Lewis, D., & Gray, S. ( 2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422-438.
7.
Bates, A., & Metcalf, C. ( 2007). A psychometric comparison of internet and non-internet sex offenders from a community treatment sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 11-20.
8.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. ( 2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis by Biostat (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
9.
*Bourke, M.L., & Hernandez, A. E. (2009). The "Butner Study" redux: A report of the incidence of hands-on child victimization by child pornography offender. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 183-191.
10.
*Buschman, J., & Bogaerts, S. ( 2009). Polygraph testing internet offenders. In D. Wilcox (Ed.), The use of polygraph in assessing, treating, and supervising sex offenders: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 111-126). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
*Coward, A.I., Gabriel, A.M., Schuler, A., & Prentky, R.A. ( 2009, March). Child internet victimization: Project development and preliminary results. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Conference, San Antonia, TX.
13.
Eisenhart, C. ( 1947). Inverse sine transformation of proportions. In C. Eisenhart, M. W. Hastay , & W. A. Wallis, (Eds.), Selected techniques of statistical analysis for scientific and industrial research and production and management engineering (pp. 395-416). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
14.
*Eke, A.W., & Seto, M.C. ( 2008, October). Examining the criminal history and recidivism of registered child pornography offenders. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
15.
*Eke, A.W., & Seto, M.C. ( 2009). Ontario Sex Offender Registry sample independent of police case sample reported by Seto and Eke (2008). Unpublished raw data.
16.
*Elliott, I.A., Beech, A.R., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Hayes, E. ( 2009). Psychological profiles of internet sex offenders: Comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 76-92.
17.
*Endrass, J., Urbaniok, F., Hammermeister, L.C., Benz, C., Elbert, T., Laubacher, A., & Rossegger, A. ( 2009). The consumption of Internet child pornography and violent and sex offending. BMC Psychiatry, 9, 43-50.
18.
*Faust, E., Renaud, C., & Bickart, W. ( 2009, October). Predictors of re-offense among a sample of federally convicted child pornography offenders. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
19.
Fleiss, J.L., Levin, B., & Paik, M.C. ( 2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20.
*Fortin, F., & Roy, J. ( 2007). Cyberpédophilie: profiles d’amateur de pédopornographie. [Cyberpedophilia: Profiles of users of child pornography]. In M. St-Yves & M. Tanguay (Eds.), Psychologie des entrevues d’enquête: De la recherche à la pratique [The psychology of investigative interviews: From research to practice] (pp. 465-502). Cowansville, Québec, Canada: Éditions Yvon Blais.
21.
*Galbreath, N.W., Berlin, F.S., & Sawyer, D. ( 2002). Paraphilias and the Internet. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 187-205). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
22.
Gelber, A. ( 2009, July). Response to "A Reluctant Rebellion" (open letter) . Retrieved from http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/ceos/ReluctantRebellionResponse.pdf
23.
Hansen, M. ( 2009, June). A reluctant rebellion. ABA Journal . Retrieved from http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/a_reluctant_rebellion
24.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
25.
Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J.R., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. ( 2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections User ReportNo2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
26.
Hanson, R.K., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. ( 2010). Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior34, 198-211.
27.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
28.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies . Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
29.
Hanson, R.K., Steffy, R.A., & Gauthier, R. ( 1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646-652.
30.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
31.
Harris, A.J.R., & Hanson, R.K. ( 2003). The Dynamic Supervision Project: Improving the community supervision of sex offenders. Corrections Today, 65, 60-62.
32.
Harris, A.J.R., & Hanson, R.K. ( 2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question. Corrections Users Report No. 2004-03: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
33.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumière, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. ( 2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
34.
Hedges, L.V. ( 1994). Fixed effect models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York, NY : Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. ( 1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
36.
Hedges, L.V., & Vevea, J.L. ( 1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
37.
Jenkins, P. ( 2001). Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York, NY: New York University Press.
38.
Johnson v. United States of America, No 4:07-cr-00127 (S.D., Iowa Central, December 3, 2008).
39.
Lam, A., Mitchell, J., & Seto, M.C. ( 2010). Lay perceptions of child pornography offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice52, 173-201.
40.
*Laulik, S., Allam, J., & Sheridan, L. ( 2007). An investigation into maladaptive personality functioning of internet sex offenders. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 523-535.
41.
Malesky, L.A. ( 2002). Sexually deviant Internet usage by child sex offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis , Memphis, TN.
42.
*McLaughlin, J.F. ( 2000). Cyber child sex offender typology. Keene, NH: Keene Police Department. Retrieved from http://www.ci.keene.nh.us/police/Typology.html
43.
Motivans, M., & Kyckelhan, T. ( 2007). Federal prosecution of child sex exploitation offenders, 2006 (Rep. No. NCJ219412). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
44.
*Neutze, J., Seto, M.C., Schaefer, G.A., Mundt, I.A., & Beier, K.M. (in press). Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
45.
*Osborn, J., Elliott, I.A., Middleton, D., & Beech, A.R. ( 2009). The suitability of the Risk Matrix 2000 for use with internet offenders. Unpublished manuscript.
46.
Overton, R.C. ( 1998). A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. Psychological Methods, 3, 354-379.
47.
*Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. ( 2003). Model of problematic internet use in people with sexual interest in children. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 93-106.
Ray, J.V., Kimonis, E.R., & Donoghue, C. ( 2010). Legal, ethical and methodological considerations in the Internet-based study of child pornography offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law24, 84-105. doi:10.1002/bsl.906.
50.
Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., Lang, C., & Cormier, C.A. ( 2006). Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured from official records? Law and Human Behavior, 30, 525-541.
51.
Seto, M.C. ( 2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
*Seto, M.C., Cantor, J.M., & Blanchard, R. ( 2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 610-615.
53.
*Seto, M.C., & Eke, A.W. ( 2005). The criminal histories and later offending of child pornography offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 17, 201-210.
54.
*Seto, M.C., & Eke, A.W. ( 2008, October). Predicting new offenses committed by child pornography offenders. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
55.
*Seto, M.C., Reeves, L., & Jung, S. ( 2010). Motives for child pornography offending: The explanations given by the offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression16, 169-180.
56.
*Sullivan, C. ( 2007). Internet trades of child pornography: Profiling research-update . Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Internal Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.dia.govt.nz/pubforms.nsf/URL/Profilingupdate2.pdf/$file/Profilingupdate2.pdf
57.
Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. ( 2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225-235.
58.
Wakeling, H.C., Howard, P.D., & Barnett, G.D. (in press). An examination of the predictive validity of the Risk Matrix 2000 with internet offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment.
59.
*Webb, L., Craissati, J., & Keen, S. ( 2007). Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 449-465.
60.
Whitehead, A. ( 2002). Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Chichester, England: Wiley.
61.
*Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K.J. (2005). Child pornography possessors arrested in Internet-related crimes: Findings from the National Online Victimization Study. Retrieved from http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC144.pdf
62.
*Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K.J. (2009). Trends in arrests of "online predators."Crime Against Children Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/cv194.pdf
63.
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K.J., & Ybarra, M. ( 2008). Online "predators" and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist , 63, 111-128.
64.
*Wollert, R., Waggoner, J., & Smith, J. ( 2009, October). Child pornographer offenders do not have florid offense histories and are unlikely to recidivate. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
65.
*Wood, J.M., Seto, M.C., Flynn, S., Wilson-Cotton, S., & Dedmon, P. ( 2009, October). Is it "just" pictures? The use of polygraph with internet offenders who deny abusive sexual contact. Poster presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Dallas, TX.
