Phallometric testing is widely considered the best psychophysiological procedure for assessing erotic preferences in men. Researchers have differed, however, on the necessity of setting some minimum criterion of penile response for ascertaining the interpretability of a phallometric test result. Proponents of a minimum criterion have generally based their view on the intuitive notion that “more is better” rather than any formal demonstration of this. The present study was conducted to investigate whether there is any empirical evidence for this intuitive notion, by examining the relation between magnitude of penile response and the agreement in diagnoses obtained in two test sessions using different laboratory stimuli. The results showed that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on both tests and that examinees with inconsistent diagnoses responded less on the second test after controlling for their response on the first test. Results also indicated that at response levels less than 1 cm3, diagnostic consistency was no better than chance, supporting the establishment of a minimum response level criterion.
Barbaree, H.E., Baxter, D.J., & Marshall, W.L. (1989). The reliability of the Rape Index in a sample of rapists and nonrapists. Violence and Victims, 4, 299-306.
2.
Blanchard, R., & Barbaree, H.E. (2005). The strength of sexual arousal as a function of the age of the sex offender: Comparisons among pedophiles, hebephiles, and teleiophiles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 441-456.
3.
Blanchard, R., Christensen, B.K., Strong, S.M., Cantor, J.M., Kuban, M.E., Klassen, P., et al. (2002). Retrospective self-reports of childhood accidents causing unconsciousness in phallometrically diagnosed pedophiles . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 511-526.
4.
Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M.E., & Blak, T. ( 2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118-126.
5.
Blanchard, R., Kolla, N.J., Cantor, J.M., Klassen, P.E., Dickey, R., Kuban, M.E., et al. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 285-309.
6.
Blanchard, R., Lykins, A.D., Wherrett, D., Kuban, M.E., Cantor, J.M., Blak, T., et al. (2009). Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 335-350.
7.
Card, R.D., & Farrall, W. ( 1990). Detecting faked penile responses to erotic stimuli: A comparison of stimulus conditions and response measures. Annals of Sex Research, 3, 381-396.
8.
Castonguay, L.G., Proulx, J., Aubut, J., McKibben, A., & Campbell, M. ( 1993). Sexual preference assessment of sexual aggressors: Predictors of penile response magnitude. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 22, 325-334.
9.
Earls, C.M., Quinsey, V.L., & Castonguay, L.G. (1987). A comparison of three methods of scoring penile circumference changes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, 493-500.
10.
Erceg-Hurn, D.M., & Mirosevich, V.M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63, 591-601.
11.
Freund, K. ( 1967). Diagnosing homo- or heterosexuality and erotic age preference by means of a psychophysiological test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 209-228.
12.
Freund, K., & Blanchard, R. ( 1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100-105.
13.
Freund, K., Scher, H., & Hucker, S. ( 1983). The courtship disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 369-379.
14.
Freund, K., Sedlacek, F., & Knob, K. ( 1965). A simple transducer for plethysmography of the male genital . Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 169-170.
15.
Freund, K., & Watson, R.J. ( 1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Psychological Assessment, 3, 254-260.
16.
Freund, K., Watson, R., & Rienzo, D. ( 1988). Signs of feigning in the phallometric test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 105-112.
17.
Golde, J.A., Strassberg, D.S., & Turner, C.M. ( 2000). Psychophysiologic assessment of erectile response and its suppression as a function of stimulus media and previous experience with plethysmography. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 53-59.
18.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. ( 1996). The science in phallometric measurement of male sexual interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 156-160.
19.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Chaplin, T.C., & Earls, C. ( 1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502-511.
20.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Chaplin, T.C., & Quinsey, V.L. ( 1999). Dissimulation in phallometric testing of rapists’ sexual preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 223-232.
21.
Howes, R.J. ( 1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 9-24.
22.
Howes, R.J. ( 1998). Plethysmographic assessment of nonsexual offenders: A comparison with rapists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 183-194.
23.
Howes, R.J. ( 2003). Circumferential change scores in phallometric assessment: Normative data. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 15, 365-375.
24.
Kolla, N.J., Blanchard, R., Klassen, P.E., Kuban, M.E., & Blak, T. (in press). Effect of sildenafil citrate on penile plethysmography responding: A pilot investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior (DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9506-6).
25.
Kuban, M.E., Barbaree, H.E., & Blanchard, R. ( 1999). A comparison of volume and circumference phallometry: Response magnitude and method agreement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 345-359.
26.
Lalumiere, M.L., & Harris, G.T. ( 1998). Common questions regarding the use of phallometric testing with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 227-237.
27.
Langevin, R. ( 1985). Introduction. In R. Langevin (Ed.), Erotic preference, gender identity, and aggression in men: New research studies (pp. 1-13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Looman, J., Abracen, J., Maillet, G., & DiFazio, R. ( 1998). Phallometric nonresponding in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 325-336.
29.
Looman, J., & Marshall, W.L. (2001). Phallometric assessments designed to detect arousal to children: The responses of rapists and child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 13, 3-13.
30.
Malcolm, P.B., Andrews, D.A., & Quinsey, V.L. ( 1993). Discriminant and predictive validity of phallometrically measured sexual age and gender preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 486-501.
31.
Quinsey, V.L., & Chaplin, T.C. ( 1988). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 49-58.
32.
Quinsey, V.L., Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. ( 1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85-105.
33.
Wormith, J.S. ( 1986). Assessing deviant sexual arousal: Physiological and cognitive aspects. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 101-137.
