Although registries of convicted sexual offenders are widely popular, little is known about the impact of the policies. The goal of this research was to measure one aspect of the impact of registry policies: patterns of usage of publicly available registries. Using a computer-assisted telephone survey, Michigan residents were questioned about their utilization of the sex offender registry and whether they believed any sex offenders lived in their community. The authors found that few respondents had looked at the registry. Reasons respondents provided for nonuse included lack of interest in the registry, living in a “safe” area, and not having children. Although it was found that registry use was related to awareness of offenders in the community, after viewing the registry, nearly half of the survey participants still believed no offenders lived in the community. Logistic regression was used to predict both registry use and awareness of offenders in the community.
Anderson, A.L., & Sample, L.L. (2008). Public awareness and action resulting from sex offender community notification laws. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 371-396.
2.
Caputo, A., & Brodsky, S. (2004). Citizen coping with community notification of released sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law , 22, 239-252.
3.
Craissati, J., & Beech, A. (2005). Risk prediction and failure in a complete urban sample of sex offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 24-40.
4.
Craun, S.W. (in press). Awareness of registered sex offenders in the neighborhood . Crime and Delinquency.
5.
Craun, S.W., & Theriot, M.T. (2008, January). Worry and misperceptions of sex offender perpetration among the general public. Poster presented at the 2008 Society for Social Work and Research Conference, Washington, DC.
6.
Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. (2008). The impact of Megan's Law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46, 411-446.
7.
Duwe, G., Donnay, W., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35, 484-504.
8.
Edwards, W., & Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 83-101.
9.
Farkas, M., & Stichman, A. (2002). Sex offender laws: Can treatment, punishment, incapacitation, and public safety be reconciled? Criminal Justice Review, 27, 256-282.
10.
Finkelhor, D. (1994). Current information on the scope and nature of child sexual abuse. The Future of Children, 4, 31-69.
11.
Freeman-Longo, R. (1996). Prevention or problem? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 91-100.
12.
Fuselier, D., Durham, R., & Wurtele, S. (2002). The child sexual abuser: Perceptions of college students and professionals. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 271-280.
13.
Human Rights Watch. (2007). No easy answers: Sex offender laws in the United States. Retrieved May 8, 2008, from www.hrw.org/reports/2007/us0907/us0907web.pdf
14.
Jacobs, J.E., Hashima, P.R., & Kenning, M.K. (1995). Children's perceptions of the risk of sexual abuse . Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 1443-1456.
15.
Levenson, J.S., Brannon, Y.N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137-161.
16.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
17.
Malesky, A., & Keim, J. (2001). Mental health professionals' perspectives on sex offender registry web sites. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 53-63.
18.
McAlinden, A. (2005). The use of "shame" with sexual offenders. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 373-394.
19.
Mustaine, E.E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K.M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329-350.
20.
Pawson, R. (2002). Does Megan's Law work? A theory-driven systematic review (Working Paper No. 8). London: University of London, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice . Retrieved April 15, 2009 from kcl.ac.uk/schools/sspp/interdisciplinary/evidence/publications/wp8.html?m=print
21.
Phillips, D. (1998). Community notification as viewed by Washington's citizens (Washington Institute for Public Policy, Seminar 3162). Retrieved May 8, 2008, from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/08-03-1101.pdf
22.
Prescott, J., & Rockoff, J. (2008). Do sex offender registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? (Working Paper No. 08-006). Ann Arbor: John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics, University of Michigan Law School . Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://www.law.umich.edu/centersandprograms/olin/abstracts/2008/Documents/08-006prescott.pdf
23.
Proctor, J., Badzinski, D., & Johnson, M. (2002). The impact of media on knowledge and perceptions of Megan's Law. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 356-379.
24.
Snyder, H.N. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident and offender characteristics. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67-81.
26.
Trivits, L., & Reppucci, N. (2002). Application of Megan's Law to juveniles. The American Psychologist, 57, 690-704.
27.
Ullman, S. (2007). Relationship to perpetrator, disclosure, social reactions and PTSD symptoms in child sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 16, 19-36.
28.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 demographic profile highlights. Retrieved May, 12, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
29.
Vogeltanz, N., Wilsnack, S., Harris, T., Wilsnack, R., Wonderlich, S., & Kristjanson, A. (1999). Prevalence and risk factors for childhood sexual abuse in women: National survey findings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 579-592.
30.
Warren, J., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R.R., Cummings, A., Gibbs, N. & Trumbetta, S. (1998) Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 35-59.
31.
Welchans, S. (2005). Megan's Law: Evaluation of sexual offender registries . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 123-140.
32.
Wilcox, P., Jordan, C.E., & Pritchard, A.J. (2006) Fear of acquaintance versus stranger rape as a "master status": Towards refinement of the "shadow of sexual assault." Violence and Victims, 21, 355-370.
33.
Zevitz, R.G. (2004) Sex Offender Placement and Neighborhood Social Integration: The Making of a Scarlet Letter Community. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law & Society, 17(2), 203-222.
34.
Zevitz, R.G. & Farkas, M. (2000) Sex offender community notification: Examining the importance of neighborhood meetings. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(2-3), 393-408.
