Everitt, B.S., & Wessely, S. (2004). Clinical trials in psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Goetghebeur, E., & Loeys, T. (2002). Beyond intent to treat. Epidemiologic Review, 24, 85-90.
3.
Gross, J. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford.
4.
Hollin, C.R. (2008). Evaluating offending behavior programmes: Does only randomization glister? Criminology & Criminal Justice , 8, 89-106.
5.
Looman, J., Abracen, J., & Nicholaichuk, T. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 279-290.
6.
Marques, J.K., Weideranders, M., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
7.
Marshall, W.L., & Marshall, L.E. (2007). The utility of the random controlled trial for evaluating sexual offender treatment: The gold standard or an inappropriate strategy. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 175-191.
8.
Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 139-153.
9.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (2003). The size and sign of treatment effects in sex offender therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , 989, 428-440.
10.
Seto, M.C., Marques, J.K., Harris, G.T., Chaffin, M., Lalumière, M.L., Miner, M.H., et al. (2008). Good science and progress in sex offender treatment are intertwined: A response to Marshall and Marshall (2007). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(3), 247-255.