Response to Lalumière and Rice: Further Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Harris, G.T. , Rice M.E. , Quinsey, V.L. , Chaplin, T.C. , & Earls, C. (1992). Maximizing the discriminate validity of phaltometric assessment data. Psychological Assessment, 4, 502-511.

Lalumière, M.L. , & Quinsey, V.L. (1994). The discriminablility of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 150-175.

Lalumière, M.L. , & Rice, M.E. (2007). The validity of phallometric assessment with rapists: Comments on Looman & Marshall (2005). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19.

Looman, J. (2006). Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 207-226.

Looman, J. , & Marshall, W.L. (2005). Sexual arousal in rapists . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 367-389.