Juvenile Sex Offender Re-Arrest Rates for Sexual,Violent Nonsexual and Property Crimes: A 10-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

We report the results of a 10-year follow-up recidivism study of two sex offender treatment programs for incarcerated juvenile sex offenders (JSOs) in Virginia. The programs vary in environment and intensity. The more intense JSO program ("self-contained") operates in specialized living units that are separate from those of the general juvenile incarcerated population. In the less intense program ( "prescriptive" ), JSOs remain housed with the general population of juvenile offenders. Arrest and incarceration data through January 2003 were obtained for 261 male JSOs released between 1992 and 2001. The inclusion of adult incarceration data allowed for a more accurate assessment of the actual time at risk for sexual re-offending. Outcomes are re-arrest rates, length of time to re-arrest and type of offense (property, nonsexual assault, sexual) on re-arrest, with analyses using survival curve functions. For both groups, actual re-arrest is most likely to be for a nonsexual person offense (31 and 47%, respectively) and least likely to be for a sexual offense (<5% for both groups). Comparing the nonequivalent groups, the self-contained treatment group has a lower predicted re-arrest rate and a longer mean time to re-arrest, for all types of offenses, than the prescriptive treatment group. In addition, juveniles who indicate high levels of impulsive/antisocial behaviors are significantly more likely to recidivate compared to juveniles with low-levels of impulsivelantisocial behaviors, regardless of treatment type. This is the first 10-year follow-up study of treatment outcomes for a relatively large sample of males who were incarcerated for sexual offenses as juveniles.

Keywords

adolescent sex offender recidivism incarcerated.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel, F. , Mittelman, M. , & Becker, J. (1985). Sex offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In J. Ben-Aron , S. Hucker , & C. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: Current concepts (pp. 127-155). Toronto: M & M Graphics.

Ageton, S. (1983). Sexual assault among adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Alexander, M.A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(2), 101-116.

Barbaree, H.E. , Hudson, S.M. , & Seto, M.C. (1993). Sexual assault in society: The role of the juvenile offender. In H. E. Barbaree , W. L. Marshall , & S. M. Hudson (Eds.). The juvenile sex offender (pp. 12-13). New York: Guilford Press.

Becker, J.V. (1990). Treating adolescent sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 362-365.

Becker, J.V. , & Abel, G. (1985). Methodological and ethical issues in evaluation and treating adolescent sex offenders. In E. M. Otey & G. D. Ryan (Eds.), Adolescent sex offenders: Issues in research and treatment (pp. 109-129). Rockville, MD: NIMH.

Becker, J.V. , Cunningham-Rathner, J. , & Kaplan, M.S. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Demographics, criminal and sexual histories, and recommendations for reducing future offenses. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1(4),431-445.

Borduin, C.M. , Henggler, S.W. , Blaske, D.M. , & Stein, R.J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Treatment and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105-114.

Borduin, C.M. , & Schaeffer, C.M. (2001). Multisystemic treatment of juvenile sexual offenders: A progress report. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13(314), 25-42.

10.

Brannon, J.M. , & Troyer, R. (1995). Adolescent sex offenders: Investigating adult commitment rates four years later. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 317-326.

11.

Bremer, J.F. (1992). Serious juvenile sex offenders: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 326-332.

12.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1998). 1973-1997 National Crime Victimization Survey data [Web site data files]. Washington, DC: BJS.

13.

Deisher, R.W. , Wenet, G.A. , Paperny, D.M. , Clark, T.F. , & Fehrenbach, P.A. (1982). Adolescent sexual offense behavior: The role of the physician. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 2(4), 279-286.

14.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice. (1987). Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice.

15.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (various). National Incident-Based Reporting System master files for the years 1991-1996 [machine-readable data files]. Washington, DC: FBI.

16.

Hagan, M.P. , & Cho, M.E. (1996). A comparison of treatment outcomes between adolescent rapists and child sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 113-122.

17.

Johnston, L. , Bachman, J. , & O'Malley, P. (1996). Monitoring the future, questionnaire responses from the Nation's high school seniors, 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

18.

Kahn, T.J. , & Chambers, H.J. (1991). Assessing re-offense risk with juvenile sexual offenders. Child Welfare, 70, 333-345.

19.

Kahn, T.J. , & Lafond, M.A. (1998). Treatment of the adolescent sexual offender. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 5, 135-148.

20.

Lab, S.P. , Shields, G. , & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sexual offender treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 543-553.

21.

McGrath, R.J. , Cumming, G.F. , & Burchard, B.L. (2003). Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The safer society 2002 nationwide survey . Safer Society Press.

22.

Milloy, C.D. (1996). Rhetoric and reality: The problem of juvenile sexual offending. Dissertation Abstracts International. 57(1-A) July, 0456, US University Microfilms International.

23.

Miner, M.H. (2002). Factors associated with recidivism in juveniles: An analysis of serious juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(4), 421-436.

24.

National Adolescent Perpetrator Network [NAPN]. ( 1993). The revised report from the National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 44, 1-121.

25.

National Center for Juvenile Justice. (1998 ). National juvenile court data archive: Maricopa county juvenile court case records, birth cohort 1962-1977 [machine-readable data file]. Pittsburgh, PA: NCJJ.

26.

Prentky, R.A. , Harris, B. , Frizzell, K. , & Righthand, S. (2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,12, 71-93.

27.

Prentky, R. , Lee, A.F.S. , Knight, R.A. , & Cerce, D. (1997). Recidivism rates among child molesters and rapists: A methodological analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 21 (6), 635-660.

28.

Prentky, R. , & Righthand, S. (2001). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP) . Bridgewater, MA: Justice Resource Institute.

29.

Prentky, R. , & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP-II) . Bridgewater, MA: Justice Resource Institute.

30.

Rasmussen, L.A. (1999). Factors related to recidivism among juvenile sex sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 69-85.

31.

Schram, D. , Milloy, D. , & Rowe, W. (1991). Juvenile sex offenders: A follow-up study of re-offense behavior. Report of the Washington State Institute of Public Policy.

32.

Smith, W.R. , & Monastersky, C. (1986). Assessing juvenile sexual offenders' risk for reoffending. Criminal Justice and Behavior ,13, 115-140.

33.

Trivits, L.C. , & Reppucci N.D. (2002) Application of Megan's law to Juveniles, American Psychologist, 57(9), 690-704.

34.

Weinrott, M.R. (1996). Juvenile sexual aggression: A critical review . Portland, OR: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.

35.

Wieckowski, E. , Waite, D. , Pinkerton, R. , McGarvey, E. , & Brown, G. (2004). Sex offender treatment in a juvenile correctional setting: Program description and nine-year outcome study. In M. Calder (Ed.), Children and young people who sexually abuse: New theory, research and practice developments (pp. 364-376). Dorset, UK: Russell House.

36.

Worling, J.R. , & Curwen, T. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 965-982.