Researchers and clinicians hypothesize that child molesters hold offence-supportive beliefs or cognitive distortions that require restructuring for successful rehabilitation. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this hypothesis. Current questionnaire measures of both untreated and treated child molesters' cognitive distortions show that these men typically disagree with cognitive distortions. Such findings, especially prior to treatment, are often interpreted to mean that child molesters are faking good. In this study we drew on personality-related research showing that when participants intentionally respond in a socially desirable way on questionnaires, they make faster item responses than when answering honestly. Untreated child molesters, treated child molesters, and two types of controls (nonsexual offenders and nonoffenders) were administered a computerized cognitive distortion questionnaire and their responses and response times were recorded. Consistent with previous research, all groups tended to disagree with the cognitive distortions. However, response time data were surprising; only the treated child molesters displayed the fake-good pattern of responding significantly faster in rejecting cognitive distortions. We speculate about the implications of these results for the cognitive distortion hypothesis, and for understanding how current treatment programs effect cognitive distortion change.
Abel, G.G., Becker, J.V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 189-103.
2.
Abel, G.G., Gore, D.K., Holland, C.L., Camp, N., Becker, J.V., & Rathner, J. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135-153.
3.
Arkowitz, S., & Vess, J. (2003). An evaluation of the Bumby RAPE and MOLEST scales as measures of cognitive distortions with civilly committed sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 237-249.
4.
Bakker, L.W., Hudson, S.M., Wales, D., & Riley, D.N. (1998). And there was light: Evaluating the Kia Marama Treatment Programme for New Zealand sex offenders against children. Wellington: Department of Corrections.
5.
Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley.
6.
Beckett, R., Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Fordham, A.S. (1994). Community-based treatment for sex offenders: An evaluation of seven treatment programmes. London: Home Office.
7.
Beech, A.R., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R.C. (1998). Step 3: An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. London: Home Office.
8.
Beech, A.R., Fisher, D., Beckett, R.C., & Scott-Fordham, A. (1998). An evaluation of the prison sex offender treatment programme. Research Findings , 79, 1-4.
9.
Blumenthal, S., Gudjonsson, G., & Bums, J. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 129-143.
10.
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist , 36. 129-148.
11.
Bumby, K.M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Developments and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
12.
Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic memory . Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
13.
Copello, A.G., & Tata, P.R. (1990). Violent behavior and interpretative bias: An experimental study of the resolution of ambiguity in violent offenders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 417-428.
14.
Eysenck, M.W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal ofAbnormal Psychology , 100, 144-150.
15.
Fekken, G.C., & Jackson, D.N. (1988). Predicting consistent psychological test item responses: A comparison of models. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 873-882.
16.
Fischler, I., & Bloom, P.A. (1980). Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences, Memory and Cognition, 8, 216-225
17.
Gannon, T.A. (in press). Increasing honest responding on cognitive distortions in child molesters: The bogus pipeline procedure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
18.
Gannon, T.A., Wright, D.B., Beech, A.R., & Williams, S.E. (2005). Do child molesters hold distorted beliefs? What does their memory recall tell us? Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
George, M.S., & Skinner, H.A. (1990). Using response time latency to detect inaccurate responses in a computerized lifestyle assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 167-175.
20.
Hanson, R.K., Gizzarelli, R., & Scott, H. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187-202.
21.
Holden, R.R., Fekken, G.C., & Cotton, D.H.G. (1991). Assessing psychopathology using structured test-item response latencies. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3,111-118.
22.
Holden, R.R., Kroner, D.G., Fekken, G.C., & Popham, S.M. (1992). A model of personality test item response dissimulation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 272-279.
23.
Holden, R.R., Wood, L.L., & Tomashewski, L. (2001). Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 160-169.
24.
Horley, J. (2000). Cognitions supportive of child molestation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 551-564.
25.
Hsu, L.M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J.R. (1989). Faking detection validity and increment validity of response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 278-295.
26.
Johnston, L., & Ward, T. (1996). Social cognition and sexual offending: A theoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 8, 55-80.
27.
Kindt, M., & Brosschot, J.F. (1997). Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 644-648.
28.
Kolton, D.J.C., Boer, A., & Boer, D.P. (2001). A revision of the Abel and Becker Cognition Scale for intellectually disabled sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13,217-219.
29.
Langevin, R. (1991). A note on the problem of response set in measuring cognitive distortions. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 287-292.
30.
Mann, R.E., & Beech, A.R. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories . In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Marshall, W.L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y.M. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
32.
Marshall, W.L., Marshall, L.E., Sachdev, S., & Kruger, R. (2003). Distorted attitudes and perceptions, and their relationship with self esteem and coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 171-18 1.
33.
McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensiveness, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,10, 25-36.
34.
Offending Behaviour Programmes Unit. (2000 ). The SOTP core programme: Assessment and evaluation manual . London: Home Office.
35.
Polaschek, D.L.L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists. What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior , 7, 385-406
36.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with outliers. Psychological Review, 114, 510-532.
37.
Rogers, T.B. (1977). Self-reference in memory: Recognition of personality items. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 295-305.
38.
Rogers, T.B., Kuiper, N.A., & Kirker, W.S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.
39.
Salter, A.C. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and their victims: A practical guide. London: Sage .
40.
Schlenker, B.R., Pontari, B.A., & Christopher, A.N. (2001). Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 15-32.
41.
Swaffer, T., Hollin, C., Beech, A., Beckett, R., & Fisher, D. (1999). An exploration of child sex abusers' cognitive distortions with specific reference to the role of anger. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 4, 31-44.
42.
Tierney, D.W., & McCabe, M.P. (2001). An evaluation of self-report measures of cognitive distortions and empathy among Australian sex offenders . Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 495-519.
43.
Vanhouche, W., & Vertommen, H., (1999). Assessing cognitive distortions in sex offenders: A review of commonly used versus recently developed instruments. Psychologica Belgica, 39, 163-187.
44.
Ward, T., Hudson, S.M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W.L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17,479-507.
