This study explores the therapeutic engagement experiences of men who have sexually offended against children and who are involved in a prototypical prison-based group treatment programme. The study examined factors relating to the therapeutic engagement of the offender in treatment, and in particular, the impact of the "out-of-group" time between sessions. The findings, although tentative, suggest that between formal therapy sessions, clients of the programme make significant movement either toward or away from engagement in the therapy. The implications of these processes with respect to clinical practice and the development of offender services are discussed.
Birgden, A., Owen, K., & Raymond, B. (2003). Enhancing relapse prevention through the effective management of sex offenders in the community. In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and contronersies, pp 317-337. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Davison, D.C., Robins, C., & Johnson, M.K. (1983). Articulated thoughts during simulated situations: A paradigm for studying cognition in emotion and behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7(1), 17-40.
3.
Elliot, R. (1989). Comprehensive process analysis. New York: State University of New York Press.
4.
Frost, A. (2004). Therapeutic engagement styles of child sexual offenders in a group treatment program: A grounded theory study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 191-208.
5.
Greenberg, L.S., & Pinsoff, W.M. (1986). The psychotiterapeutic pocess. New York: Guilford.
6.
Henry, J. (1999). Changing conscious experience—Comparing clinical approaches, practice and outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 587-609.
7.
Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (Eds.). (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Inciardi, J.A. (1996). The therapeutic community: An effective model for corrections-based drug abuse treatment. In K. E. Early (Ed.), Drug treatment behind bars: Prison-based strategies for-change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
9.
Kanfer, F.H., & Schefft, B.M. (1988). Guiding the process of therapeutic change, Champaign, IL: Research Press.
10.
Lipton, D.S. ( 1998). Therapeutic community treatment programming in corrections. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 213-263.
11.
Rennie, D.L. (1992). Qualitative analysis of the client's experience of psychotherapy: The unfolding of reflexivity. In D. L. Rennie & S. G. Toukmanian (Eds.), Psychotherapy process research: Paradiagmatic and narrative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Rennie, D. L., & Toukmanian, S. G. (Eds.). (1992). Psychotherapy process research: Paradigmatic and narrative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Rice, L.N., & Greenberg, L.S. ( 1984). The new research paradigm . In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process. New York: Guilford.
14.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Busi(-s of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
