With the recent realization of the extent to which adolescents are committing sexual offenses, researchers have attempted to identify valid and reliable assessment instruments for this population. Some such assessment instruments (i.e., plethysmography, self-report) have met with criticism relative to their utility with juvenile offenders. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the Abel Assessment for sexual interest™(AASI) with male adolescents who have molested children. Results indicated that the amount of time male adolescent child molesters viewed slides of children was significantly longer than nonmolesters. Additionally, viewing time of slides of children for male adolescent child molesters was significantly correlated with their number of victims and the number of times they carried out acts of child molestation. These results support the AASI as a valid measure of sexual interest in adolescent male child molesters.
Abel, G.G. (2000). The importance of meeting research standards: A reply to Fischer and Smith's articles on the Abel Assessment for sexual interest™. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 12(2), 155-161.
2.
Abel, G.G., Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland C.L. (1998). Visual reaction time and plethysmography as measures of sexual interest in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 81-95.
3.
Abel, G.G., Jordan, A., Hand, C.G., Holland, L.A., & Phipps, A. (2001). Classification models of child molesters utilizing the Abel Assessment for sexual interest™. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 25(5), 703-718.
4.
Abel, G.G., Mittelman, M.S., & Becker, J.V. (1985). Sexual offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In H. Ben-Aron, S. I. Hucker, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology (pp. 191-205). Toronto, Canada: M. M. Graphics.
5.
Abel, G.G., & Rouleau, J.L. (1990). The nature and extent of sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 9-21). New York: Plenum Press.
6.
Abel, G.G., Rouleau, J.L., Lawry, S.S., Barrett, D.H., & Camp, N.L. (1990). A non-invasive, physiologic measure of adult sexual preference. Paper presented at the 16th annual meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Sigtuna, Sweden.
7.
Barbaree, H.E. (1990). Stimulus control of sexual arousal: Its role in sexual assault. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 115-138). New York: Plenum Press.
8.
Becker, J.V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., & Kaplan, M.S. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Demographics, criminal and sexual histories and recommendations for reducing future offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 431-445.
9.
Becker, J.V., Hunter, J.A., Goodwin, D., Kaplan, M.S., & Martinez, D. (1992). Test-retest reliability of audio-taped phallometric stimuli with adolescent sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research , 5, 45-51.
10.
Becker, J.V., Hunter, J.A., Stein, R.M., & Kaplan, M.S. (1989). Factors associated with erection in adolescent sex offenders. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment , 11, 353-362.
11.
Becker, J.V., & Kaplan, M.S. (1988). The assessment of adolescent sexual offendersAdvances in Behavioral Assessment of Children and Families , 4, 97-118.
12.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). National crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
13.
DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., & Clarke-Pearson, D.L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837-845.
14.
Fehrenbach, P.A., Smith, W., Monastersky, C., & Deisher, R.W. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Offenders and offense characteristics. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 225-233.
15.
Greenfield, L.A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16.
Groth, A.N., & Loredo, C.M. (1981). Juvenile sexual offenders: Guidelines for assessment . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 25, 31-39.
17.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
18.
Hunter, J.A., Goodwin, D.W., & Becker, J.V. (1994). The relationship between phallometrically measured deviant sexual arousal and clinical characteristics in juvenile sexual offenders . Behavioral Research and Therapy, 32, 533-538.
19.
Jordan, A., Zolondek, S., Abel, G.G., & Gray, S.R.Improving the reliability and predictiveness of visual reaction time with nonlinear transformations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20.
Lagueux, F., & Tourigny, M. (1998). État des connaissances au sujet des adolescents agresseurs sexuels (AAS). Hull, Quebec, Canada: Université du Québec à Hull.
21.
Longo, R.E., & Groth, A.N. (1983). Juvenile sexual offenses in the histories of adult rapists and child molesters. International Journal of Offenders Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 27, 150-155.
22.
Madrigrano, G., Rouleau, J.-L., & Robinson M.-C. (1997), Caracteristiques sociodemographiques et cliniques d'une population d'adolescents ayant commis des crimes sexuelsRevue quebecoise de psychologie, 18(3), 91-110.
23.
Malcolm, B., Davidson, P., & Marshall, W. (1985). Control of penile tumescence: The effects of arousal level and stimulus content. Behavior Research and Therapy , 23, 272-280.
24.
Murphy, W.D., Krisak, J., Stalgaitis, S.J., & Anderson, K. (1984). The use of penile tumescence measures with incarcerated rapists: Further validity issues. Archives of Sexual Behavior , 13, 545-554.
25.
Osborn, C., Abel, G.G., & Warberg, B.W. (1995). The Abel Assessment: Its comparison to plethysmography and resistance to falsification. Paper presented at the 14th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New Orleans, LA.
26.
Quinsey, V.L., Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T., & Reid, K.S. (1993). The phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of sexual age preference in males: Conceptual and measurement issues. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 143-163). New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Robinson, M.C., Rouleau, J.-L., & Madrigano, G. (1997). Validation de la Plétysmographie pénienne comme mesure des Intérets Sexuels des agresseurs adolescents. Revue Québécoise dePsychologie, 18(3), 111-124.
28.
Rosenzweig, S. (1942). The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest. Psychosomatic Medicine, 4, 150-157.
29.
Satterthwaite, F.W. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110-114.
30.
Serin, R.C., Malcolm, B.P., Khanna, A., & Barbaree, H.E. (1994). Psychopathy and deviant sexual arousal in incarcerated sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 3-11.
31.
Seto, M.C., Lalumiere, M.L., & Blanchard, R. (2000). The discriminant validity of a phallometric test for pedophilic interest among adolescent sex offenders against children. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 319-327.
32.
Smith, G., & Fischer, L. (1999). Assessment of juvenile sexual offenders: Reliability and validity of the Abel Assessment for Interest in ParaphiliasSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11(3),207-216.
33.
Weinrott, M.R. (1996). Juvenile sexual aggression: A critical review . Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
34.
Weinrott, M.R., Riggan, M., & Frothingham, S. (1997). Reducing deviant arousal in juvenile sex offenders using vicarious sensitization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(5), 704-728.
35.
Wright, L.W., & Adams, H.E. (1994). Assessment of sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16(3), 221-231.
36.
Zolondek, S.C., Abel, G.G., Northey, W.F., Jr., & Jordan, A.D. (2001). The self-reported behaviors of juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(1), 73-85.
