This meta-analytic review examined the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders by summarizing data from 43 studies (combined n = 9,454). Averaged across all studies, the sexual offence recidivism rate was lower for the treatment groups (12.3%) than the comparison groups (16.8%, 38 studies, un-weighted average). A similar pattern was found for general recidivism, although the overall rates were predictably higher (treatment 27.9%, comparison 39.2%, 30 studies). Current treatments (cognitive-behavioral, k = 13; systemic, k = 2) were associated with reductions in both sexual recidivism (from 17.4 to 9.9%) and general recidivism (from 51 to 32%). Older forms of treatment (operating prior to 1980) appeared to have little effect. Future directions for improving the quality of sex offender treatment outcome evaluations are discussed.
Abracen, J., Looman, J., & Nicholaichuk, T. (1999). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched comparison subjects: Data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) post-1989 sample. Unpublished manuscript, Regional Treatment Centre, Correctional Service of Canada, Kingston, Ontario.
2.
Alexander, M. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 101-116.
3.
*Allam, J. (1998). Community-based treatment for sex offenders: An evaluationBirmingham, U.K.: University of Birmingham.
4.
*Allam, J. (1999). Effective practice in work with sex offenders: A re-conviction study comparing treated and untreated offenders. West Midlands Probation Service Sex Offender Unit (Available from Jayne Allam WMPS SOU, 826 Bristol Road, Selly Oak, Birmingham , West Midlands, B29 6NA)
5.
Andrews, D.A., Zinger, E., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
6.
*Bakker, L., Hudson, S., Wales, D., & Riley, D. (1999). "And there was light": An evaluation of the Kia Marama Treatment Programme for New Zealand sex offenders against children Unpublished report. New Zealand.
7.
Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Wells-Parker, E., & Chevillard, I. (1997). Assessing the methodological quality of research in narrative reviews and meta-analyses. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle , & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 405-429). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Barbaree, H.E. (1997). Evaluating treatment efficacy with sexual offenders: The insensitivity of recidivism studies to treatment effects. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 111-128.
9.
*Barbaree, H.E., & Seto, M.C. (1998). The ongoing follow-up of sex offenders treated at the Warkworth Sexual Behaviour Clinic Research Report prepared for the Correctional Service of Canada. [Warkworth]
10.
*Barnes, J.M., & Peterson, K.D. (1997). The Kentucky Sex Offender Treatment ProgramCommonwealth of Kentucky, Justice Cabinet, Department of Corrections, Division of Mental Health. Kentucky State Reformatory , Kentucky.
11.
*Berlin, F.S., Hunt, W.P., Malin, M.H., Dyer, A., Lehne, G.K., & Dean, S. (1991). A five-year plus follow-up survey of criminal recidivism within a treated cohort of 406 pedophiles, 111 exhibitionists and 109 sexual aggressives: Issues and outcomes. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 12(3), 5-28.
12.
*Berliner, M.L., Schram, D., Miller, L.L., & Milloy, C.D. (1995). A sentencing alternative for sex offenders: A study of decision making and recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(4), 487-502. [Washington]
13.
*Bluglass, R. (1980). Indecent exposure in the West Midlands. In D. West (Ed.), Sex offenders in the criminal justice system (pp. 171-180). Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Criminology.
14.
*Borduin, C.M., Henggeler, S.W., Blaske, D.M., & Stein, R.J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105-113.
15.
*Borduin, C.M., Schaeffer, C.M., & Heilblum, N. (2000, May). Multi-systemic treatment of juvenile sexual offenders: A progress report. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on the Treatment of Sexual Offenders, Toronto.
16.
*Bremer, J.F. (1992). Serious juvenile sex offenders: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Psychiatric Annals, 22(6), 326-332.
17.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally .
18.
*Clelland, S.R., Studer, L.H., & Reddon, J.R. (1998). Follow-up report of rapists treated in a forensic psychiatric hospital. Violence and Victims, 13(1), 79-86. [Alberta Hospital]
19.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Sage.
21.
*Cs/Resors. (1991). An evaluation of community sex offender programs in the Pacific Region (No.21803-0-A602/O1-XSB) . Vancouver, BC: Author.
22.
*Davidson, P.R. (1984, January). Behavioural treatment for incarcerated sex offenders: Post-release outcome. Paper presented at the Sex Offender Assessment and Treatment Conference, Kingston, ON. [RTC Ontario]
23.
*Dwyer, S.M. (1997). Treatment outcome study: Seventeen years after sexual offender treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(2), 149-160. [Dwyer]
24.
*Earls, C.M. (1997). Étude sur la récidiveClinique La Macaza Bulletin d'information, 2(1), 1-2. [La Macaza]
25.
*Earls, C.M., Martin, I., & Bélanger, H. (October 18, 1999). La Macaza outcome study. Unpublished raw data. [La Macaza]
26.
*Evaluation of sex offender rehabilitation programs in the state of Florida. (1977). Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. Mental Health Program Office, Talahassee, FL. [Florida]
27.
Fleiss, J.L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245-260). New York: Sage.
28.
Friendship, C., & Thornton, D. (2001). Sexual reconviction for sexual offenders discharged from prison in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology , 41, 285-292.
29.
Furby, L., Weinrott, M.R., Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3-30.
30.
Gallagher, C.A., Wilson, D.B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M.B., & MacKenzie, D.L. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 19-29.
31.
*Gordon, A., & Packard, R. (1998). The impact of community maintenance treatment on sex offender recidivism. Paper presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers , Vancouver, BC. [Twin Rivers]
32.
*Guarino-Ghezzi, S., & Kimball, L.M. (1998). Juvenile sex offenders in treatment. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2(1), 45-54.
33.
*Hall, G.C.N. (1995a). The preliminary development of theory-based community treatment for sexual offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(5), 478-483.
34.
Hall, G.C.N. (1995b). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809.
35.
Hanson, R.K. (1997). How to know what works with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9, 129-145.
36.
Hanson, R.K. (2000). Treatment outcome and evaluation problems (and solutions). In D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson, & A. Ward (Eds.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
38.
*Hanson, R.K., & Nicholaichuk, T. (2000). A cautionary note regarding Nicholaichuk et al. (2000). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 289-293. [Clearwater]
39.
*Hanson, R.K., Steffy, R.A., & Gauthier, R. (1992). Long-term follow-up of child molesters: Risk prediction and treatment outcome (User Report No. 1992-02). Ottawa : Corrections Branch, Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
40.
*Hanson, R.K., Steffy, R.A., & Gauthier, R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646-652.
41.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
42.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. (1998). Appraisal and management of risk in sexual aggression: Implications for criminal justice policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 73-115.
43.
Hedges, L.V. (1994). Fixed effect models. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 285-299). New York: Sage.
44.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
45.
*Hersh, K., Baldwin, K., & Gray-Little, B. (1999, September). Treatment completion and recidivism among incarcerated sex offenders. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Orlando, FL.
46.
*Huot, S. (1999, April). Minnesota study of sex offender recidivism Unpublished data.
47.
*Kramer, S.P. (1985). Sex offender treatment and tracking: Problems, perspectives and outcomes in the Utah criminal justice system Unpublished manuscript.
48.
*Lab, S.P., Shields, G., & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sexual offender treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 39(4), 543-553.
49.
Laws, D. R. (Ed.). (1989). Relapse prevention with sex offenders. New York: Guilford.
50.
*Lindsay, W.R., Marshall, I., & Neilson, C. (1998). The treatment of men with a learning disability convicted of exhibitionism. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 19(4), 295-316.
51.
*Lindsay, W.R., Neilson, C.Q., & Morrison, F. (1998). The treatment of six men with a learning disability convicted of sex offences with children. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 83-89.
52.
*Lindsay, W.R., & Smith, A.H.W. (1998). Response to treatment for sex offenders with intellectual disability: A comparison of men with 1- and 2-year probation sentences. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42, 346-353.
53.
*Looman, J., Abracen, J., & Nickolaichuk, T.P. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls: Data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 279-290. [RTC Ontario]
54.
Lösel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 79-114). Chichester: Wiley.
55.
Mander, A.M., Atrops, M.E., Barnes, A.R., & Munafo, R. (1996). Sex offender treatment program: Initial recidivism study Unpublished report, Alaska Department of Corrections Offenders Programs, Alaska Justice Statistical Analysis Unit Justice Center and University of Alaska, Achorage.
56.
*Marques, J.K. (1999). How to answer the question, "Does sex offender treatment work?" Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(4), 437-451.
57.
*Marques, J.K., & Day, D.M. (May, 1998). Sex offender treatment evaluation project: Progress report (May, 1998). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Mental Health.
58.
*Marques, J.K., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & West, M.A. (1993). Findings and recommendations from California's experimental treatment program. In G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment and treatment (pp. 197-214). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
59.
*Marques, J.K., Day, D.M., Nelson, C., & West, M.A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offenders recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28-54.
60.
*Marshall, W.L., & Barbaree, H.E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26(6), 499-511.
61.
*Marshall, W.L., Eccles, A., & Barbaree, H.E. (1991). The treatment of exhibitionists: A focus on sexual deviance versus cognitive and relationship features. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 129-135.
62.
*Martin, I. (1998). Efficacité d'un programme cognitif-behavioural institutionnel pour delinquants sexuels Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Montreal. [La Macaza]
63.
*McGrath, R.J., Hoke, S.E., & Vojtisek, J.E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(2), 203-225.
64.
*McGuire, T.J. (2000). Correctional institution based sex offender treatment: A lapse behavior study. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 18, 57-71.
65.
*Meyer, L.C., & Romero, J. (1980). A ten year follow-up of sex offender recidivismPennsylvania, PA: Joseph J. Peters Institute. [JJ Peters]
66.
*Miner, M., & Dwyer, S.M. (1995). Analysis of dropouts from outpatient sex offender treatment. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 7(3), 77-93. [Dwyer]
67.
*The Missouri Sexual Offender Program. (1989 ). Updated figures for Missouri sex offender study. Department of Corrections, Division of Classification and Treatment , Jefferson City, MO. [Missouri]
68.
*Mulloy, R., & Smiley, W.C. (1996). Recidivism and treated sex offenders. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychologists , Montreal, QC. [RHC Pacific]
69.
*Nicholaichuk, T.P. (1996). Sex offender treatment priority: An illustration of the risk/need principle. Forum on Corrections Research , 8(2), 30-32. [Saskatchewan]
70.
Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Andre, G., & Gu, D. (1995). Outcome of the Clearwater Sex Offender Treatment Program: A matched comparison between treated and untreated offenders Unpublished manuscript, Regional Psychiatric Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
71.
*Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 139-153. [Clearwater]
72.
*Nutbrown, V., & Stasiak, E. (1987). Research monograph: A retrospective analysis of O.C.I. cost effectiveness 1977-1981. Ontario Correctional Institute, 2, 1-16.
73.
*Pellerin, B., Proulx, J., Ouimet, M., Paradis, Y., McKibben, A., & Aubut, J. (1996). Etude de la recidive post-traitement chez des aggresseurs sexuels judiciarisesCriminologie, 29, 85-108. [Pinel]
74.
*Perkins, D. (1987). A psychological treatment programme for sexual offenders. In B. J. McGurk, D. M. Thornton, & M. Williams (Eds.), Applying Psychology to Treatment: Theory & Practice (pp. 192-217). Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London.
75.
*Pierson, T.A. (1988). The Missouri Sexual Offender Program: Inmate Characteristics and Recidivism Analysis, 1984-1985 releases. Department of Corrections, Division of Classification and Treatment, Jefferson City, MO. [Missouri]
76.
*Proctor, E. (1996). A five-year outcome evaluation of a community-based treatment program for convicted sexual offenders run by the probation service . Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2, 3-16.
77.
*Proulx, J., Ouimet, M., Pellerin, B., Paradis, Y., McKibben, A., & Aubut, J. (1998). Posttreatment recidivism rates in sexual aggressors: A comparison between dropout and nondropout subjects (No. 98-22). Les cahiers de l'ecole de criminologie, University of Montreal , Montreal, Quebec. [Pinel]
78.
*Quinsey, V.L., Khanna, A., & Malcolm, P.B. (1998). A retrospective evaluation of the Regional Treatment Centre sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 621-644. [RTC Ontario]
79.
*Rattenbury, F.R. (1986). The outcomes of hospitalized and incarcerated sex offenders: A study of offender types, recidivism rates, and identifying characteristics of the repeat offender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School ofLoyola University of Chicago, IL.
80.
Redondo, A., Sánchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (1999). The influence of treatment programmes on the recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders: An European meta-analytic review. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 251-278.
81.
*Report on treatment programs for sex offenders: Summary and recommendations. ( 1984). In conjunction with the Governor's Task Force on Sex Offenders and Their Victims, Florida Mental Health Institute, Tampa, FL. [Florida]
82.
*Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., & Harris, G.T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386.
83.
*Robinson, D. (1995). The impact of cognitive skills training on post-release recidivism among Canadian federal offenders (No. R-41). Ottawa, ON, Correctional Service Canada, Correctional Research and Development.
84.
*Romero, J.J., & Williams, L.M. (1983). Group psychotherapy and intensive probation supervision with sex offendersFederal Probation, 47, 36-42. [JJ Peters]
85.
*Seto, M.C., & Barbaree, H.E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1235-1248. [Warkworth]
86.
*Sex offender programs: Program manuals, descriptions, evaluations, & research. (1998). Regional Health Centre (Pacific). [RHC Pacific]
87.
*Sex offenses in Washington State: 1998update. (1998). Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Olympia, WA. [Washington]
88.
*Smiley, W.C., & Mulloy, R. (1995). Treatment of sex offenders: Does intervention work? Unpublished Manuscript. [RHC Pacific]
89.
*Song, L., & Lieb, R. (1995). Washington state sex offenders: Overview of recidivism studies. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. [Twin Rivers; Washington]
90.
*Studer, L.H., & Reddon, J.R. (1998). Treatment may change risk prediction for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 10, 181. [Alberta Hospital]
91.
*Studer, L.H., Reddon, J.R., Roper, V., & Estrada, L. (1994). Sexual offender recidivism: An evaluation of the Pheonix programAlberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB. [Alberta Hospital]
92.
Swenson, C.C., Henggeler, S.W., & Schoenwald, S.K. (2001). Family-based treatments . In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 205-220). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
93.
United States General Accounting Office. ( 1996). Sex offender treatment: Research results inconclusive about what works to reduce recidivism. Washington, DC: Author.
94.
*Walker, D.W. (2000). The treatment of adult male child molesters through group family intervention. In A. P. Colmenárez & R. H. Serrano (Eds.), Violencia (pp. 191-197). Caracas, Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
95.
Wierzbicki, M., & Pekarik, G. (1993). A meta-analysis of psychotherapy drop-out. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 190-195.
96.
Wille, R., & Beier, K.M. (1989). Castration in Germany. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 103-133.
97.
*Worling, J.R., & Curwen, T. (1998). The adolescent sexual offender project: A 10-year follow-up study. SAFE-T Program (Sexual Abuse: Family Education & Treatment) Thistletown Regional Centre for Children & Adolescents & Probation and Community Services, OntarioMinistry of Community and Social Services: Toronto, ON.
