While most people experience potentially traumatic events (PTEs), including Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), the stress reactions to PTEs on mental health outcomes are highly heterogeneous. Resilience is influenced by a complex biopsychosocial ecological system, including gene serotonin transporter-linked promoter region or 5-HTTLPR /rs25531 by ACEs interactions.
AIMS:
This pilot study investigated the gene-by-environment interactions on mental health outcomes in adults enrolled in a health care profession program using a generalized additive model (GAM).
METHODS:
Seventy health care college students (mean age = 27.4 years, 67.1% women) participated in this cross-sectional study. Saliva samples were collected from students to analyze 5-HTTLPR/rs25531. Participants completed the ACE Questionnaire and the Mental Health Inventory. GAMs with different interaction terms were built adjusting for age, gender, and race. The value of the effective degree of freedom (EDF) quantifies the curvature of the relationship.
RESULTS:
Among participants with the long allele of 5-HTTLPR/rs25531, a linear pattern was found between the total ACE score and mental health outcomes (EDF = 1). Conversely, among participants with the short allele, EDF was approximately 2, indicating a curved association suggesting that mental health worsens in individuals exposed to up to four types of ACEs.
CONCLUSIONS:
The impact of up to four ACEs on mental health was stronger among individuals with the short allele of 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 than those with the long allele. Although this study does not claim to provide a definite approach to analyzing gene-by-environment interactions, we offer a different perspective to explore the relationship.
BonannoG. A.DiminichE. D. (2013). Annual research review: Positive adjustment to adversity–trajectories of minimal-impact resilience and emergent resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54(4), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12021
2.
BonannoG. A.GaleaS.BucciarelliA.VlahovD. (2007). What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.671
3.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (1998). Beyond recovery from trauma: Implications for clinical practice and research. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01223.x
ClarkC. S.AboueissaA. E. (2021). Nursing students’ adverse childhood experience scores: A national survey. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 18(1), 20210013. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2021-0013
6.
CrumpeiI.DafinoiuI. (2012). Secondary traumatic stress in medical students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1465–1469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.322
7.
Del GiudiceM. (2017). Statistical tests of differential susceptibility: Performance, limitations, and improvements. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416001292
8.
DobsonK. S.PuschD.PooleJ.McKayM. (2021). The assessment of adverse childhood experiences: Factor structure and convergent validity of multiple measures. American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 7(3), 181–196.
9.
DohrenwendB. P. (1974). Stressful life events: Their nature and effects. John Wiley & Sons.
10.
EllisB. J.BoyceW. T.BelskyJ.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IjzendoornM. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611
11.
FelittiV. J.AndaR. F.NordenbergD.WilliamsonD. F.SpitzA. M.EdwardsV.KossM. P.MarksJ. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in Adults: The adverse childhood experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8
12.
Galatzer-LevyI. R.HuangS. H.BonannoG. A. (2018). Trajectories of resilience and dysfunction following potential trauma: A review and statistical evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 63, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.05.008
13.
GianoZ.WheelerD. L.HubachR. D. (2020). The frequencies and disparities of adverse childhood experiences in the U.S. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article 1327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09411-z
14.
GreenbergB. D.TolliverT. J.HuangS. J.LiQ.BengelD.MurphyD. L. (1999). Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter promoter region affects serotonin reuptake in human blood platelets. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 88(1), 83–87.
15.
HastieT. J.TibshiraniR. J. (2017). Generalized additive models (1st ed.). Routledge.
16.
HombergJ. R.JagiellowiczJ. (2022). A neural model of vulnerability and resilience to stress-related disorders linked to differential susceptibility. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(1), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01047-8
17.
Jolicoeur-MartineauA.BelskyJ.SzekelyE.WidamanK. F.PluessM.GreenwoodC.WazanaA. (2020). Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model. Development and Psychopathology, 32(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001438
18.
KaysenD.RosenG.BowmanM.ResickP. A. (2010). Duration of exposure and the dose-response model of PTSD. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329131
19.
MagwaiT.XuluK. R. (2022). Physiological genomics plays a crucial role in response to stressful life events, the development of aggressive behaviours, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Genes, 13, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020300
20.
MayerK. A.LinehanK. J.MacMillanN. K. (2022). Student perspectives on potential sources of trauma exposure during nursing school. Nursing Forum, 57(5), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12728
21.
NiitsuK.LeeC.RiceM. J. (2023). Identification of relationships among resilience factors by using network analysis: A pilot study. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903231212908
22.
PluessM. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120
23.
PluessM. (2017). Vantage sensitivity: Environmental sensitivity to positive experiences as a function of genetic differences. Journal of Personality, 85(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12218
24.
ReineltE.StopsackM.AldingerM.JohnU.GrabeH. J.BarnowS. (2013). Testing the diathesis-stress model: 5-HTTLPR, childhood emotional maltreatment, and vulnerability to social anxiety disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 162B(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32142
SzantonS. L.GillJ. M. (2010). Facilitating resilience using a society-to-cells framework: A theory of nursing essentials applied to research and practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 33(4), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181fb2ea2
28.
ThibodeauxJ. (2021). Conceptualizing multilevel research designs of resilience. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(5), 1418–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22598
29.
UngarM.TheronL. (2020). Resilience and mental health: How multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. Lancet Psychiatry, 7(5), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1
VeitC. T.WareJ. E.Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(5), 730–742. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6630688
32.
WielingM. (2018). Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 86–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002
