Appreciation for Our Peer Reviewers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2018). Responsibilities in the submission and peer-review process. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html

Kearney

Baggs

Broome

Dougherty

Freda

(2008). Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 395-400. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00255.x

Mulligan

Hall

Raphael

(2012). Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 132-161. doi:10.1002/asi.22798

Smith

(2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 178-182. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178

Sucato

G. S.

Holland-Hall

(2018). Reviewing manuscripts: A systematic approach. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 31, 441-445. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2018.06.005

Tite

Schroter

(2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(1), 9-12. doi:10.1136/jech.2006.049817