Background: An estimated 15.1 million adults ages 18 years and older are classified with an alcohol use disorder, which includes 9.8 million men and 5.3 million women. A brief intervention is indicated for those identified to be at risk because of alcohol use. Objective: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of informational videos about alcohol use. Design: This feasibility study provided participants with the opportunity to choose one of two videos, Alcohol and the Brain or Rethinking Drinking. An online survey was administered to all study participants to identify alcohol-related risk, readiness to decrease use, and knowledge pertaining to alcohol use. Results: The two videos provided in this study were feasibly delivered in an on-line format to 129 adults, including 115 males and 5 females identified to be at risk. Knowledge scores increased only slightly. There were mixed results for the readiness scores. Conclusions: Future research should examine the efficacy of these two alcohol brief interventions on alcohol-related outcomes.
BaborT. F.Higgins-BiddleJ. C.DauserD.BurlesonJ. A.ZarkinG. A.BrayJ. (2006). Brief interventions for at-risk drinking: Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness in managed care organizations. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 41, 624-631. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agl078
2.
BanerjeeJ.BhattacharyyaM. (2011). Selection of the optimum font type and size interface for on screen continuous reading by young adults: An ergonomic approach. Journal of Human Ergology, 40(1-2), 47-62.
3.
BarryK. L.BlowF. C.WillenbringM.McCormickR.BrockmannL. M.VisnicS. (2004). Use of alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary care settings: Implementation and barriers. Substance Abuse, 25, 27-36.
4.
CapikC.GozumS. (2015). Psychometric features of an assessment instrument with Likert and dichotomous response formats. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 81-86. doi:10.1111/phn.12156
5.
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality [CBHSQ]. (2016). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2015 survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. SMA 16-4984, NSDUH Series H-51). Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data
ClabornK. R.FernandezA.WrayT.RamseyS. (2015). Computer-based HIV adherence promotion interventions: A systematic review. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5, 294-306.
8.
DealeyC. (2005). The factors that influence patients’ choice of hospital and treatment. British Journal of Nursing, 14, 576-579. doi:10.12968/bjon.2005.14.10.18109
9.
de Meneses-GayaCZuardiA. WLoureiroS. RCrippaJ. A. S. (2009). Alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): An updated systematic review of psychometric properties. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2(1), 83-97. doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.1.12
10.
FinnellD. S. (Writer). (2012). The neurobiology of alcohol use. Buffalo, NY: B-Roll Productions.
11.
FinnellD. S.CareyM. G.NowzariS. (2013). A brief intervention to promote understanding of the neurobiological basis of hazardous alcohol use and treatments. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 37(Suppl. 2), 81A.
12.
FinnellD. S.NowzariS. (2013). Providing information about the neurobiology of alcohol use disorders to close the “referral to treatment gap.”Nursing Clinics of North America, 48, 373-383.
13.
GustafsonD. H.ShawB. R.IshamA.BakerT.BoyleM. G.LevyM. (2011). Explicating an evidence-based, theoretically informed, mobile technology-based system to improve outcomes for people in recovery for alcohol dependence. Substance Use & Misuse, 46, 96-111. doi:10.3109/10826084.2011.521413
14.
HeatherN.SmailesD.CassidyP. (2008). Development of a readiness ruler for use with alcohol brief interventions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 98, 235-240.
15.
KatahiraK.MatsudaY. T.FujimuraT.UenoK.AsamizuyaT.SuzukiC.. . . OkadaM. (2015). Neural basis of decision making guided by emotional outcomes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113, 3056-3068. doi:10.1152/jn.00564.2014
16.
KuerbisA. N.YuanS. E.BorokJ.LeFevreP. M.KimG. S.LumD.. . . MooreA. A. (2015). Testing the initial efficacy of a mailed screening and brief feedback intervention to reduce at-disk drinking in middle-aged and older adults: The comorbidity alcohol risk evaluation study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63, 321-326.
17.
LiY. (2016, July). Creative color designs for product packaging. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshop, Seattle, WA. doi:10.1109/ICMEW.2016.7574659
18.
MacKenzieS.GaleE.MundayR. (2006). Putney auditory single word yes/no assessment (PASWORD). Development of a reliable test of yes/no at a single word level in patients unable to participate in assessments requiring a specific motor response: An exploratory study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41, 225-234. doi:P151M07L2URX6313
19.
MerrittS. (2006). Mastering multiple choice: The definitive guide to achieving breakthrough results on multiple choice exams. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Brain Ranch.
MojtabaiR.CrumR. M. (2013). Perceived unmet need for alcohol and drug use treatments and future use of services: Results from a longitudinal study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 127, 59-64.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2015). Rethinking drinking: Alcohol and your health (13-3770). US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.rethinkingdrinking.niaaa.nih.gov/
24.
RehmJ.GmelG.SemposC. T.TrevisanM. (2003). Alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. Alcohol Research & Health, 140, C00-C97.
25.
SinghS. (2006). Impact of color on marketing. Management Decision, 44, 783-789.
26.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General (2016). Facing addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s report on alcohol, drugs and Health. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/
27.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2004). Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
