Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ( 2002). Evidence report/technology assessment: Number 47: Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from Http://Www.Ahrq.Gov/Clinic/Tp/Strengthtp.Htm
2.
Beck, C.T. (2002). Postpartum depression: A metasynthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 453-472.
3.
Beck, C.T. (2004). Birth trauma: In the eye of the beholder. Nursing Research, 53(1), 28-35.
4.
Beck, C.T., & Indman, P. (2005). The many faces of postpartum depression. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 34(5), 569-576.
5.
Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
6.
Crowther, M.A., & Cook, D.J. (2007). Trials and tribulations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Hematology / the education program of the American Society of Hematology. American Society of Hematology Education Program , 2007, 493-497.
7.
Einarson, T.R., & Einarson, A. (2005). Newer antidepressants in pregnancy and rates of major malformations: A meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 14(12), 823-827.
8.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B.M., & Schultz, A. (2005). Transforming healthcare from the inside out: Advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 335-344.
9.
Fineout-Overholt, E., Hofstetter, S., Shell, L., & Johnston, L. (2005). Teaching EBP: Getting to the gold: How to search for the best evidence. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 2(4), 207-211.
10.
Goldsmith, M.R., Bankhead, C.R., & Austoker, J. (2007). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(3), 262-270.
11.
Guyatt, G.H., Mills, E.J., & Elbourne, D. (2008). In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter. PLoS Medicine, 5(1), E4.
12.
Hoffmann, S., Cepok, S., Grummel, V., Lehmann-Horn, K., Hackermueller, J., Stadler, P.F., et al. (2008). HLA-DRB1(*) 0401 and HLA-DRB1(*) 0408 are strongly associated with the development of antibodies against interferon-beta therapy in multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Human Genetics , 83(2), 219-227.
13.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2002). Evidence-based practice. Key steps in implementing evidence-based practice: Asking compelling, searchable questions and searching for the best evidence. Pediatric Nursing , 28, 262-263, 266.
14.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Rapid critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials: An essential skill for evidence-based practice (EBP). Pediatric Nursing, 31, 50-52.
15.
Mundy, K.M., Stein K. F. (2008). Meta-analysis as a basis for evidence-based practice: The question is, why not?Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 14, 326-328.
16.
Noblit, G., & Hare, D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
Ogilvie, D., Fayter, D., Petticrew, M., Sowden, A., Thomas, S., Whitehead, M., et al. (2008). The harvest plot: A method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 8.
18.
Phillips, B., Ball, C., Sackett, D.L., et al. (2001). Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
19.
Rice, M.J. (2008). Evidence-based practice in psychiatric care: Defining levels of evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 14: 181-187.
20.
Sandelowski, M. (2006a). "Meta-jeopardy": The crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nursing Outlook, 54(1), 10-16.
21.
Sandelowski, M. (2006b). In response to: De Witt L. & Ploeg J. (2006) Critical appraisal of rigor in interpretive phenomenological nursing research . Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(2), 215-229. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(5), 643-645.
22.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(3), 213-219.
23.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies . Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 905-923.
24.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4), 365-371.
25.
Sandelowski, M., Trimble, F., Woodard, E.K., & Barroso, J. (2006). From synthesis to script: Transforming qualitative research findings for use in practice. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1350-1370.
26.
Sandelowski, M.J. (2008). Justifying qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(3), 193-195.
27.
Song, F., Khan, K.S., Dinnes, J., & Sutton, A.J. (2002). Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(1), 88-95.
28.
Souza, J.P., Pileggi, C., & Cecatti, J.G. (2007). Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: An analytic survey. Reproductive Health, 4, 3.
29.
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M.H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342-1365.
30.
Voils, C.I., Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Hasselblad, V. (2008). Making sense of qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed research synthesis studies. Field Methods, 20(1), 3-25.
31.
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.