BACKGROUND:Patient education is an essential element to quality health care, both in the physical health andmental health care arenas. Providers use written materials as tools to educate, but benefits are dependent on learners’ reading and comprehension abilities. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate adequacy of reading level and readability of psychotropic medication patient handouts.STUDYDESIGN:Reading level and readability of 15 psychotropic medication patient handouts were evaluated using the SMOG formula and the Readability Assessment Instrument, respectively.RESULTS:All 15 handouts were written at inadequate reading levels and readability. Reading levels were above 12th grade, with amean of 13.5 (± 1.5 grades), and overall readability was below the acceptable score of 80% (M= 6%).CONCLUSIONS:Inadequate reading skills and comprehension may impede patients’ learning and their ability to understand their illness and follow provider instructions. Providersmust ensure education materials are written at adequate reading and readability levels to optimize learning and maximize desired outcomes related to treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adkins, A. D., Elkins, E. N., & Singh, N. N. (2001). Readability of NIMHeasy-to-read patient education materials. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 279-285.
2.
Adkins, A. D.,& Singh, N. N. (2001). Reading level and readability of patient education materials in mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 1-8.
3.
Albright, J., de Guzman, C., Acebo, P., Paiva, D., Faulkner, M., & Swanson, J. (1996). Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice. Applied Nursing Research, 9, 139-143.
4.
Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., Clark, W. S., & Nurss, J. (1997). The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1027-1030.
5.
Campbell, R. J. (1996). Psychiatric dictionary(7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Cooley, M. E., Moriarty, H., Berger, M. S., Selm-Orr, D., Coyle, B., & Short, T. (1995). Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncology Nursing Forum, 22, 1345-1351.
7.
Horner, S. D., Surratt, D.,& Juliusson, S. (2000). Improving readability of patient educationmaterials [Electronic version]. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 17, 15-23.
8.
Humfress, H.,& Schmidt, U. (1999). Readability of user leaflets. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 272-276.
9.
Kirkpatrick, M. F., & Mohler, C. P. (1999). Using the readability assessment instrument to evaluate patient medication leaflets. Drug Information Journal, 33, 557-563.
10.
Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L.,& Kolstad, A. (1993). Executive summary of adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey[Electronic version]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education’sNationalCenter for Education Statistics.
11.
Linhorst, D. M. (1995). Implementing psychosocial rehabilitation in long-term inpatient psychiatric facilities [Electronic version]. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 58-67.
12.
McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading—a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639-646.
13.
National Cancer Institute. (1994). Clear and simple: Developing effective print materials for low-literate readers(NIH Publication No. 95-3594). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
14.
Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V.,& Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults: A new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537-541.
15.
Richardson, J. S.,& Morgan, R. F. (1994). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16.
Sakland, S. R. (2002). The psychopharmacology desktop reference. Providence, RI: Manisses Communications Group.
17.
Singh, A. N. (1999). Readability of behavioral treatment programs in mental health. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 369-375.
18.
Singh, J. (1994). RAIN: Readability Assessment Instrument manual. Midlothian, VA: Woodlake Institute for Human Services.
19.
Singh, J. (1995). The readability of educational materials written for parents of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 207-218.
20.
Singh, J. (2000). The readability of HIV/AIDS education materials. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 214-224.
21.
Williams, M. V., Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M.,& Nurss, J. R. (1998). Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158,166-172.
22.
Williams, M. V., Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Parikh, N. S., Pitkin, K., Coates, W. C., et al. (1995). Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1677-1682.
23.
Wilson, F. L. (1996). Patient education materials nurses use in community health. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 18, 195-205.
