Although this paper does not advocate jailing pregnant drug- abusing women, the volume of women offenders now processed through jails provides a unique opportunity to identify drug-abusing women early in their pregnancies, provide them with prenatal medical services, and facilitate their entry into drug treatment and rehabilitative programs. The need for this type of intervention strategy is apparent, and the rationale for program development well supported. The authors are aware of a few such programs for identifying and treating jailed drug-abusing pregnant women. One program is described here as an example of how such programs may originate and function through collaborative effort. On a cost-per-client basis, jail programs for pregnant drug-abusing women appear costly; however, the long-term costs to society of drug- abusing women and drug-exposed infants are much greater. Unfortunately, most local communities are unlikely to be in a position today to budget for the long-term. Consequently, if such programs are worthwhile, methods should be sought to support their development and continuance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Correctional Association [ACA]. (1990). The female offender: What does the future hold? Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
2.
AustinJ., BloomB., & DonahueT. (1992). Female offenders in the community: An analysis of innovative strategies and programs. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
3.
BarryE.M. (1987). Imprisoned mothers face extra hardships. Journal of the National Prison Project, 14:1-4.
4.
Bell,T.A., FarrowJ.A., StammW.E., CritchlowC.W., & HolmesK.K. (1985). Sexually transmitted diseases in females in a juvenile detention center. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 12:140-143.
5.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1990a). Report of the findings of a survey of the nation’s jails regarding jail drug treatment programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1990b). Women in prison: A special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1991a). Jail inmates, 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (1991b). Prisoners in 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
9.
Centers for Disease Control. (1992). HIV/AIDS surveillance report (pp 1-18). Atlanta, GA: National AIDS Clearinghouse.
10.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1992). Crime in the United States 1991: Uniform Crime Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
11.
FinkelsteinN. (1993). Treatment programming for alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant women. International Journal of the Addictions, 28(13), 1275-1309.
12.
GarciaS.A. (1993). Maternal drug abuse: Laws and ethics as agents of just balances and therapeutic interventions. International Journal of the Addictions, 28(13), 1331-1339.
13.
GoldsteinA., & KalantH. (1990). Drug policy: Striking the right balance. Science, 249:1513-1521.
14.
HserY.I., ChouC.P., & AnglinM.D. (1990). The criminality of female narcotics addicts: A causal modeling approach. Journal of Quantitative. Criminology, 6(2):207-228.
15.
Ingram-FogelC. (1991). Health problems and needs of incarcerated women. Journal of Prison and Jail Health, 10(1):43-57.
16.
MaguireK., PastoreA.L., & FlanaganT.J. (1993). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics--1992. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
17.
National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (1990b). Treatment works: The tragic cost of undervaluing treatment in the "drug war". Washington, DC: NASADAD.
18.
National Institute of Corrections. (1991). Intervening with substance-abusing offenders: A framework for action. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19.
National Institute of Justice. (1990). 1988 Drug use forecasting annual report: Drugs and crime in America. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office.
20.
National Institute of Justice. (1991). Drug use forecasting: Drugs and crime, 1990 annual report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
PetersR.H., KearnsW.D., MurrinM.R., & DolenteA.S. (1992). Effectiveness of in-jail substance abuse treatment: Evaluation results from a national demonstration program. American Jails, 6(1 ):98-104.
22.
ReedB.B. (1987). Developing women-sensitive drug dependent treatment services: Why so difficult?. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 19(2), 151-164.
23.
ResnickJ., & ShawN. (1980). Prisoners of their sex: Health problems of incarcerated women. In I.P. Robbins (ed.), Prisoner’s Rights Sourcebook II. New York: Clark Boardman.
24.
ScottN.A., HannumT.E., & GilchristS.L. (1982). Assessment of depression among incarcerated females. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46:372-379.
25.
TurnerT.H., & TofflerD.S. (1986). Indicators of psychiatric disorder among women admitted to prison. British Medical Journal, 26:651-653.
26.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1990). Drug-exposed infants: A generation at risk (Report to the Chairman, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
27.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991a). Drug treatment: Despite new strategy, few federal inmates receive treatment (Report to the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, GAO Publ. No. [HRD] 91-116). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
28.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1991b). Drug treatment: State prisons face challenges in providing services (Report to the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, GAO Publ. No. [HRD] 91-128). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
29.
WeinerJ., & AnnoB.J. (1992). The crisis in correctional health care: The impact of the national drug control strategy on correctional health services. Annals of Internal Medicine, 117(1):71-77.
30.
WellischJ., AnglinM.D., & PrendergastM.L. (1992). Treatment strategies for drug abusing women offenders. In J.A. Inciardi (ed.), Drug treatment and criminal justice (pp. 5-29). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
31.
Wells, D.V.B., & JacksonJ.F. (1992). HIV and chemically dependent women: Recommendations for appropriate health care and drug treatment services. International Journal of the Addictions, 27(5), 571-585.
32.
WishE.D., O’NeilJ., & BaldauV. (1990). Lost opportunity to combat AIDS: Drug abusers in the criminal justice system. In C.G. Leukefeld, R.J. Battjes, and Z. Amsel (eds.), AIDS and intravenous drug use: Future directions for community-based prevention research (NIDA Research Monograph No. 93, pp. 187-209). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
33.
WishE.D., O’NeilJ., CrawfordC.A., & BaldauV. (1992). Lost opportunity to combat AIDS: Drug abusers in the criminal justice system: An update. In T. Mieczkowski (ed.), Drugs, crime, and social policy: Research, issues, and concerns. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
34.
ZellmanG.L., JacobsonP.D., DuPlessisH., & DiMatteoM.R. (1993). Detecting prenatal substance exposure: An exploratory analysis and policy discussion. Journal of Drug Issues, 23(3), 375-387.
